Capitol Hill Blue

Can Obama shore up support for health care bill?

By
Dec 15 2009


President Barack ObamaAfter months of turmoil, President Barack Obama and Senate Democrats are reaching for the unity they need to pass health care legislation by Christmas, but without the government-run insurance program that liberals have long sought.

Even an expansion of Medicare, initially proposed as a backup to the government option, appeared unlikely to survive following a closed-door senators-only meeting called to consider trade-offs necessary to assure 60 votes for the bill.

“Put me down tonight as encouraged about the direction these talks are going,” Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., said late Monday, only 24 hours after he rattled Democrats by threatening to oppose the legislation over the Medicare provision.

Obama invited all Senate Democrats to the White House for a meeting Tuesday afternoon that held promise of a unity event. Obama needs every one of them to hang together to give him the 60 votes required to overcome stalling tactics from Republicans united in opposition to the sweeping health overhaul measure.

Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., promised to deliver.

“I’m confident that by next week we will be on our way toward final passage of a bill that saves lives, saves money and saves Medicare,” Reid told reporters after Monday night’s meeting.

Liberals had sought the Medicare expansion as a last-minute substitute for a full-blown, government-run insurance program that moderates insisted be removed from the legislation. But it drew strong opposition from Lieberman and quieter concerns from other Democrats — all of whom hold votes essential for passage.

Reid did not say flatly that Democrats had decided to drop the proposal for uninsured Americans as young as 55 to purchase coverage under Medicare, the government program now open to people when they turn 65. But several senators said it appeared inevitable.

“We’re not going to get all that we want but we’re going to get so much more than we have,” liberal Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., said.

The overall measure, costing nearly $1 trillion over a decade, is designed to expand coverage with a new requirement for nearly everyone to purchase health insurance, and ban industry practices such as denying coverage on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions. Obama also has urged Congress to slow the growth in health care spending nationally; several days after Reid submitted a package of revisions, lawmakers awaited final word from the Congressional Budget Office on that point.

Disputes over abortion and the importation of prescription drugs from Canada and other countries also simmered as the Senate entered a third week of debate on the legislation.

In a gesture that Democrats said was aimed at the AARP, Reid promised that any final compromise with the House would completely close a gap in Medicare prescription drug coverage generally known as the “doughnut hole.” The Senate bill goes only part way toward that goal.

Less than an hour after Reid spoke, AARP CEO A. Barry Rand issued a statement thanking the Nevada Democrat.

Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., led the effort to lift a long-standing ban on the importation of prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere. Obama favored the plan as a senator, but the pharmaceutical industry is opposed, and the White House appeared anxious not to jeopardize a monthslong alliance with drug makers who have been helpful in trying to pass the overhaul. A vote was set for late Tuesday.

The obstacle that loomed largest was the Medicare expansion proposal, vestige of a monthslong debate over the role of government in the newly revised health care system. It emerged last week as part of a framework agreement between moderates and liberals. Additionally, the proposal calls for creation of nationwide plans run by private insurance companies under the supervision of the Office of Personnel Management, which oversees health plans for members of Congress and other federal workers.

The two provisions were seen as a replacement for Reid’s initial call for a government-run insurance plan to compete with private industry, a liberal priority opposed by moderates as an unwanted government intrusion. The one unrelated to Medicare is expected to survive, but without standby authority for the OPM to set up a government-run plan if no private coverage options materialize.

Opposition to the Medicare change blossomed from doctors and hospitals, who are paid less to treat Medicare patients than those covered by private insurance companies.

___

Associated Press writers David Espo, Donna Cassata, Andrew Miga and Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar contributed to this report.

Posted on Dec 15 2009 Filed under White House. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

5 Comments for “Can Obama shore up support for health care bill?”

  1. Carl Nemo

    This President is not a friend of the people…period! : |

    If he were then he’d have given them a warning if their finished legislative product was not friendly to the needs of the greater majority of Americans then it would meet the tip of his “veto pen”, but no, here’s a current headline from Yahoo.com …

    “President Barack Obama prodded Senate Democrats to overcome the last, lingering disputes blocking agreement on a national health care overhaul Tuesday, declaring [they were "on the precipice" of enacting historic legislation] that has eluded administrations and lawmakers for decades.”  ….exract from Yahoo news article my brackets

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091215/ap_on_bi_ge/us_health_care_overhaul

    Obama is both an educated and a “street smart” man.  He also has advisers that keep him posted on the details of this evolving piece of “junk legislation” who’s main outcome will be to invade our privacy and financial affairs while creating the “Patriot Act of Healthcare” for this nation.

    He said they were “on the precipice” of enacting this legislation and I say our nation is on the precipice of absolute and total destruction with these elected mattoids at the helm. 

    This is an example of partisanship “gone wild”, both parties jabbing, stabbing, feinting and again thrusting at each other with little regard to the consequences of the crap they crank out of Congress 24/7/365.

    If any citizen thinks this legislation will turn out for their collective benefit then I have news for them.  Within a few years it will be quite evident it’s a “bust” and the both the expense and inefficiences weren’t worth the paper it was drafted upon, not including the billions too that will be pilfered or stolen no different than current Medicare fraud revelations.

    America is in “harms way” and it seems we’re headed to the bottom…!

    Carl Nemo **==

     

  2. bryan mcclellan

    Contemplation, El photo…

    What overtures wafting in abject futility may we be subjected to next ?

    I Presidentee,

    photo, present me as thinkee..

    Welcome to the 11th century,

    Times two…….

    And we will be there before …..you know it.

  3. woody188

    If this passes in a partisan manner there is going to be turmoil.  Most of the folks I talk with, Republican, Democrat, and Independent, are all against this bill because it gives too much away (mandatory coverage under penalty of law) and provides little to nothing in return.  It’s essentially become nothing but a giveaway to insurance, pharmaceutical, and health organizations and still does nothing to stop or even slow the costs of treatment.

  4. scrawley

    To paraphrase Abraham Lincoln… As a party, in the last election, democrats declared: “The time for Universal heathcare is now.”  We now have “no public option, no early buy-ins to medicare and no international purchase of prescription drugs”  – the three legs of reform that provided the cost savings necessary to make it work. Several democrats – by holding out their support – have killed the dream of universal healthcare.  Now that it has come to this I think I prefer voting for some party that makes no pretense of caring for people, the republicans, for instance, where naked greed can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.

  5. Carl Nemo

    Nicely stated and spot-on Scrawley…!  : )

    Better to both know and confront an in your face, straightup enemy, than hypocritical knaves who enamour themselves with “in our face lies”…! 

    Fie on them all, but mostly so on those that will trifle with the American people, violating their trust with  campaign trail lies. 2010 is coming and the Dems are soon to pay the supreme price for such ongoing duplicity. … : | 

    Carl Nemo **==

Comments are closed









Log in | A web site by Doug Thompson