Obama set to unveil 'too big to fail' plans

The Obama administration plans to unveil on Monday a new plan for dealing with troubled financial giants, said a senior U.S. lawmaker, who also mentioned potentially big changes for the insurance industry.

Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee and a chief architect of the financial regulation overhaul, declined on Friday to give details on the administration's new bill, which would give the government the power to dismantle large financial companies that get into crises.

The new draft bill is expected to take a tougher stance toward troubled financial firms than the administration's original plan, and may take out some language that would allow for temporary bailouts.

Giving the government "resolution authority" would serve as a rebuttal to the concept that some firms are too big to fail. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke on Friday highlighted the need for this authority as well as other measures to reduce the likelihood that one firm could destabilize the financial system.

Frank also said Congress is discussing whether to create an optional federal charter for insurers.

Insurance companies are currently regulated by the states.

"If we do get into national chartering it will be in life insurance ... and maybe large commercial entities," Frank said during remarks to a banking symposium.

He said lawmakers would not likely try to federally regulate property and casualty insurers, however.

Frank's committee has cranked its efforts to overhaul financial regulation into high gear in recent days.

On Thursday it voted to approve legislation that would create a federal financial consumer watchdog. It has also passed new rules to police over-the-counter derivatives like the credit default swaps that helped fuel the financial crisis, and the full House has approved efforts to curb abusive pay practices.

While Frank's committee has made significant headway, the reform effort faces an uncertain future in the Senate and may be pushed into next year.

One idea that does seem to be gaining steam in the Senate is the move to consolidate all federal banking supervision into one super agency. Currently, four regulators share responsibility.

Christopher Dodd, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, is a leading advocate of the consolidation, and has said he will push it forward despite regulators' reservations.

Frank, however, does not think it will pass.

"There is no remote chance of it happening," he said.

He said lawmakers will likely merge the Office of Thrift Supervision and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, but allow the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp to keep their supervisory roles.

Frank also commented on the rulings of pay czar Kenneth Feinberg, who on Thursday slashed compensation for many of the top earners at seven firms that have received billions of dollars in taxpayer funds.

"I think he did a good job," he said.

On the same day that Feinberg released his rulings for the seven firms, the Federal Reserve revealed its own pay guidelines to encompass a larger chunk of financial firms.

The Fed's bank pay guidelines, while not specific, are designed to curb forms of compensation that entice employees to take large risks.

Frank said the Fed's guidelines should have a large impact and said Congress is working to finalize legislation that would clarify that the Fed does have the authority to closely police pay.

almandine on October 26, 2009 - 3:19pm

Ah, the new boss - same as...

hologram5 on October 26, 2009 - 3:58pm

You know how you deal with them? LET THEM FAIL. I am tired of bailing out fat-cats while I go broke from lack of work to sky-rocketing health care costs. I could care less if they make it or not.

To Boldly Go...
Anywhere there is sanity...

woody188 on October 26, 2009 - 4:51pm

Proving once again that government is only good at growing larger and spending more.

Here I thought bankruptcy was for breaking up failed companies assets. Silly me.

If something is large enough to bring down the whole system they should probably be looked at for anti-trust charges and broken up. Competition would help keep bankers from breaking the law.

All these laws exist now. Just what are these clowns doing?

Holder could charge AIG executives with insurance fraud today if he wanted. They wrote policies they didn't have the capital to cover. Practically the definition of fraud. How's about upholding current law before mucking around with it more?

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Our Liberties We Prize and Our Rights We Will Maintain

Carl Nemo on October 26, 2009 - 7:28pm

I agree Woody. We already had an SEC in place along with a host of laws regulating stocks, commodities, banks and even state regulation of the insurance industry. All the regulators along with the laws and rules they are sworn to enforce let this nightmare unfold. Even Bernie Madoff slipped through the cracks while the SEC knew there were major red flags concerning his activities.

So now our ever so 'concerned' Congress is going to enact more laws and no doubt create evermore oversight and control with no doubt a few more Czars to boot and all for what?! So within the next five years or so if we are even around as a remnant nation will have even more high order financial crimes exposed only for them to have ignored the problems as they've done to date.

Our entire Congressional body and Executive Branch have turned into a circus act with evil clowns doing somersaults before our eyes in order to distract us from their criminality and malfeasance to date.

Carl Nemo **==

Cpt Kirk on October 26, 2009 - 8:05pm

Too big to fail is too big to exist.

bendjamin on November 10, 2009 - 4:27am

If something is large enough to bring down the whole system they should probably be looked at for anti-trust charges and broken up. Competition would help keep bankers from breaking the law.
"The Obama administration plans to unveil on Monday a new plan for dealing with troubled financial giants, said a senior U.S. lawmaker, who also mentioned potentially big changes for the insurance industry."
Here is more about life insurance reform