Obama switches tactics on health care push

President Barack Obama is switching his message on his overhaul of the nation’s health care system, readying a fresh pitch designed for those who already have insurance.

The White House is retooling its message amid polling that shows Americans — especially those who already have coverage — skeptical of the Democratic proposals to expand coverage to millions. Instead, Obama will use a potentially boisterous town hall-style meeting in New Hampshire to highlight how his proposals would affect workers whose employers provide their health insurance.

The shift also is a potential blueprint for lawmakers’ August recess. Critics of the president’s plan have grabbed headlines by disrupting town hall meetings, and the White House expects that Tuesday’s event may be bumpy.

Concerns over Obama’s proposal are heating up meetings, chat rooms and radio shows, driving his poll numbers down and threatening the future of his top domestic priority. While Congress is in recess for the month of August, lawmakers are hearing from constituents worried about divisive issues such as the government’s role in health care and the costs of an overhaul.

"There’s a lot of fear out there," said Rep. Carol Shea-Porter, a New Hampshire Democrat.

To calm that fear, Obama plans to spend the month highlighting the upside of health overhaul for Americans already with insurance, starting in a state in which 89 percent of residents have health coverage.

In Portsmouth, N.H., Obama will speak directly about his proposal to ban insurance companies from denying individuals coverage because of pre-existing conditions. During a Friday trip to Bozeman, Mont., he will talk about how his plan would block companies from dropping an individual’s coverage if he or she becomes ill. And in Grand Junction, Colo., the president will talk about how the Democrats’ plan would end high out-of-pocket costs in some policies.

The Democratic National Committee began running television advertising that asks, "What’s in it for you?" and then highlights those goals. Officials said the ad started running Monday night in Washington and on cable; it would follow as early as Tuesday in states Obama planned to visit, including New Hampshire.

About 1,800 people are expected for that midday event in the Democratic-leaning Seacoast region of the Granite State. Of those, 70 percent were given tickets based on a random lottery — a potentially dicey crowd in a state known for its grass-roots political activism.

"Participating in government here in New Hampshire is like putting on socks for the average American," said Ray Buckley, the chairman of the New Hampshire Democratic Party.

Outside, a dozen grass-roots organizations plan a counter-rally.

"We are against the blind-faith, fast-tracking approach being advocated by special-interest supporters of the bill, congressional representatives, as well as the president," said George Lovejoy, a former state senator and chairman of the New Hampshire Advantage Coalition.

In an e-mail to Obama supporters in New Hampshire, an aide invited supporters to counter the counter-protesters and called them organized by "Washington insiders, insurance companies and well-financed special interests who don’t go a day without spreading lies and stirring up fear."

Republicans say the heated debate is a sign of widespread public dissatisfaction with Obama’s ideas. But with some of the anxieties spilling into angry disruptions and even threats, Democrats have accused Republicans of orchestrating the events to sabotage legislation. In an article published Monday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer wrote, "Drowning out opposing views is simply un-American."

Obama and his aides stayed away from such provocative language.

"We are having a vigorous debate in the United States, and I think that’s a healthy thing," Obama said, repeating that thought three times. But, he said, the dynamic will change once the recess ends and the lawmakers — and the debate — return to Washington.

Aboard Air Force One, White House spokesman Bill Burton further sought to distance Obama from the "un-American" comment: "Well, I think there’s actually a pretty long tradition of people shouting at politicians in America."

Meanwhile, the White House returned to campaign mode, starting with sending members of the Cabinet to key states. The tech-savvy Obama team directly responded to what it considers misinformation through its Twitter and Facebook accounts online, as well as a new page of the White House’s Web site.

Organizing for America, Obama’s political operation, also urged supporters to visit the offices of members of Congress to express their support for overhaul.


  1. Route101

    Most of us don’t know what the draft proposals are or mean, so it’s difficult to be rationally for or against the whole thing. However, those of us with health insurance already are paying for those without in the form of higher premiums, deductibles, co-payments, limitations, etc. The un(der)-insured use emergency rooms for basic medical care. Hospitals and doctors pass those costs on in the form of even higher prices that insurers pay and then pass on to the insured. Charges and costs are ridiculously high. So, the status quo stinks (also).

    My out of pocket costs have increased every year for decades. Insurance companies (health, life, property, auto, liability, etc.) are businesses. These days many working people do not have health care coverage, and can or would pay for some sort of group coverage. If there is some way to cut the waste, fraud and abuse (private and governmental), lower the costs I and others now pay, and get more people to shoulder some of their share, then I would welcome it.

    However, this issue is turning into another political game where the people are just the pawns. Insurance companies are spending tons of money lobbying and advertising (then they’ll come back with more rate increases to “cover expenses”) and politicians are using it for their own career (sic) purposes. It’s more than enough to make you sick – if you can afford it.

  2. hologram5

    Agreed, good post. The insurance companies are spending grips of money right now because they know that people are tired of paying through the nose for terrible coverage. Not to say we’ll get any better from the US Gov. But hey, we have to start somewhere right? Even little change is better than none at all.

    To Boldly Go…
    Anywhere there is sanity…

  3. anoyaliberal

    I saw where the gov. wants us to turn in people who spread “misinformation”about obamacare but so far obama is the only one I have seen or heard doing any spreading! All Americans are saying is YES we need some change in insurance ,and NO we can not trust the government to be the change, all we have to do is look at the track record.Farm programs -Killing small farmers, social security -do you feel secure?Border security lol,national security?homeland security? When did we decide our nation wasn’t our homeland???Balanced budget,well the list goes on and on… WE can not afford to turn any more of our care over to the government they will kill us with rules and regulations for our own good.What is now the finest health care system on earth will be lost in red tape and if you think its expensive to see a doctor now just think what you will be charged to be put on a bureaucrats waiting list to see if you are worthy to see a doctor who may be allowed to put you on a waiting list for a specialist…obamacare NO NO NO