Senate weighs health insurance options

Look out Aetna, Humana and UnitedHealthcare. Senators are meeting behind closed doors to consider whether the federal government should jump into the health insurance business.

The government already covers medical care for seniors, disabled people, poor families and many children. But coverage in those programs is restricted to people who meet certain qualifications, including age and income.

The issue now is whether middle-class workers and their families should be offered the choice of joining a government-sponsored plan similar to what they get through their employers.

If Congress agrees, a public plan would be part of the health overhaul legislation that lawmakers want to put on President Barack Obama’s desk later this year.

Senators on the Finance Committee on Thursday are weighing several designs for a public plan. They also will be given the option of having no public plan at all.

That last option is the outcome the insurance industry is hoping for.

The companies say a government plan could put them out of business, and they’ve offered to submit to new consumer protections and help find $2 trillion in health care savings over 10 years in the hopes of warding off any government-sponsored plan. Business groups also are leery of the idea. Republicans already are saying a public plan would put bureaucrats, not doctors and patients, in control of life-and-death decisions.

But Democrats think the idea would be a political winner. Since Medicare — a government-run plan — is popular with seniors, they figure a public plan for the middle class would also find acceptance.

Two of the designs that senators will consider call for a plan that’s like Medicare, except it would pay doctors and hospitals a little more generously. In one version, the public plan would be run directly by the government. The alternative would be to have it administered by regional middlemen under contract to the government.

A third idea would leave it up to each state to set up and run their own public insurance plans.

A fourth option, promoted by Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., would try to address concerns about unfair competition from a public plan.

Schumer’s proposal would require the public plan to be financed by premiums, not tax dollars. It would have to follow the same solvency rules as private insurers, maintaining a reserve fund to cover liabilities. Doctors and hospitals would be free to participate in the plan, or opt out. And the public plan would have to operate under the same consumer protection rules as private insurers.

Schumer says he believes the public plan would set a high standard for quality. Since it wouldn’t have to turn a profit, it could invest in prevention and wellness.

His idea is getting a close look also from a group of fiscally conservative Democrats in the House, known as the Blue Dogs.

___

On the Net:

Senate Finance Committee: http://www.finance.senate.gov

3 Responses to "Senate weighs health insurance options"

  1. southgeorgia912  May 14, 2009 at 10:07 am

    This whole government run health plan is a joke. The Government needs to stay their nose out of health care. They will sell snow cones six feet under before I allow myself to accept a medical decision on myself made by a damn bureaucrat. As far as Schumer goes, he’s a total idiot.

  2. Carl Nemo  May 14, 2009 at 1:51 pm

    I concur southgeorgia and too am fearful as to what nightmarish scheme our ineffective Congress might hatch and force down the American people’s throats for national health care.

    Everything they are involved with turns to s**t whether its the waging of wars, government waste, the bailing out of insurance and banking criminals, or even in the pursuit of justice, they’ve become a self-serving, greedy, brawling, useless lot!

    I thought I’d supply a vidclip showing how our ‘egalitarian’ Senators work when they are getting input from all the sources while hatching their national health insurance “scam”.

    Also a second link explains single payer plans and as to how they are perceived in ridding health plans of the most pernicious money waster of all; ie. overhead, via administrative costs.

    http://www.peaceteam.net/action/pnum982.php

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-payer_health_care

    Carl Nemo **==

    p.s. The first link shows the Senate Finance Committee holding a hearing concerning national health care. The ability to view the clip seems to be intermittent possibly due to its popularity or it’s being removed from the source because they don’t want Americans to view their boneheaded antics directed towards citizens.

  3. remoran  May 14, 2009 at 2:53 pm

    “Never stop questioning.” Einstein

    Single payer is the only viable way to healthcare but the insurance companies and Banksters own congress and the president so we, the taxpayers, are going to get screwed. I fear we are at the beginning stages of a revolution akin to that of the French revolution whereby the rich and connected tell us to eat cake while stealing our money. Anger is ramping up, something that will accelerate when Obama’s bailout fails to do anything about the depression we are entering. Healthcare is the icing on the cake, pardon the pun, where Baucus basically told us to shut up and take what we give you. I also agree Schumer is an idiot bought and paid for by WS.

Comments are closed.