<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our twittering  world &#8211; the dark side.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/16649/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/16649</link>
	<description>The oldest political news site on the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ladywolf55</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/16649/comment-page-1#comment-47439</link>
		<dc:creator>Ladywolf55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47439</guid>
		<description>At the risk of appearing asinine, try Tumblr http://www.tumblr.com/. Then link to your tumblr blog through Tweets to get the coverage you desire.  You can post longer thoughts at Tumblr, which can be well-thought out, and well said. Twitter is for those who can say a lot in a condensed version.  Any good proofreader can do it well. 

I do understand and agree somewhat with your point, though. The one thing I didn&#039;t see you mention, however, is the government LIKES to keep it&#039;s &quot;subjects&quot; short of attention span, low on brain power, and very obedient. And it works, because we have more sheeple than people in the USA, for a certainty. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of appearing asinine, try Tumblr <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tumblr.com/</a>. Then link to your tumblr blog through Tweets to get the coverage you desire.  You can post longer thoughts at Tumblr, which can be well-thought out, and well said. Twitter is for those who can say a lot in a condensed version.  Any good proofreader can do it well. </p>
<p>I do understand and agree somewhat with your point, though. The one thing I didn&#8217;t see you mention, however, is the government LIKES to keep it&#8217;s &#8220;subjects&#8221; short of attention span, low on brain power, and very obedient. And it works, because we have more sheeple than people in the USA, for a certainty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Nemo</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/16649/comment-page-1#comment-47440</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47440</guid>
		<description>Thanks Rob Kezelis for the &quot;Twitter tutorial&quot;.  Ladywolf55 made a comment on my blog post to the effect that she was attempting to post a link to my blog on &quot;Twitter&quot;, but it was removed. The removal was perceived as censorship, but a second post indicated she had found an alternative method to achieve her posting.  

I&#039;ve heard the term before, but hadn&#039;t made a serious attempt to research what &quot;Twitter&quot; meant.  

This morning I read the Wiki description and you&#039;ve now expanded the subject along with the grave ramifications of irresponsible twittering activity. 

If the country goes down because of &quot;dark&quot; Twittering activity, then all I can say is that it will be an appropriate ending because Americans for the most part have devolved into a bird-brained lot with seemingly the attention span of chickens or less; Ladywolf55 et al. on CHB &amp; RR excluded of course... : )

Carl Nemo **==</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rob Kezelis for the &#8220;Twitter tutorial&#8221;.  Ladywolf55 made a comment on my blog post to the effect that she was attempting to post a link to my blog on &#8220;Twitter&#8221;, but it was removed. The removal was perceived as censorship, but a second post indicated she had found an alternative method to achieve her posting.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard the term before, but hadn&#8217;t made a serious attempt to research what &#8220;Twitter&#8221; meant.  </p>
<p>This morning I read the Wiki description and you&#8217;ve now expanded the subject along with the grave ramifications of irresponsible twittering activity. </p>
<p>If the country goes down because of &#8220;dark&#8221; Twittering activity, then all I can say is that it will be an appropriate ending because Americans for the most part have devolved into a bird-brained lot with seemingly the attention span of chickens or less; Ladywolf55 et al. on CHB &#038; RR excluded of course&#8230; : )</p>
<p>Carl Nemo **==</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

