Dems may halt funding for troop surge

For the first time, new Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is saying Democrats may use the power of the purse to stop President George W. Bush’s controversial and unpopular plan to send more Americans troops to their death in his failed Iraq war.

“If the president chooses to escalate the war, in his budget request, we want to see a distinction between what is there to support the troops who are there now,” Pelosi said on CBS’s Face the Nation. “The American people and the Congress support those troops. We will not abandon them. But if the president wants to add to this mission, he is going to have to justify it and this is new for him because up until now the Republican Congress has given him a blank check with no oversight, no standards, no conditions.”

Pelosi continued:

“The administration’s policy in Iraq has failed and there is a question of how much longer we sustain this failure,” Pelosi said on the news talk show. “Right now, the war in Iraq is harming our military readiness. “That’s why you see hawk leaders in the Congress – those perceived as hawks – distancing themselves from the President.”

Up until now, Democrats have been reluctant to suggest cutting funding for the war because they did not want to be perceived as not supporting the troops.

Pelosi suggested withdrawal from Iraq might be necessary in order to assure that the United States has the military capability to protect itself at home.

On Saturday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said he would oppose Bush’s plan.

“Based on the advice of current and former military leaders, we believe this tactic would be a serious mistake,” Reid said.

“Voters are watching to see what difference this election can make. The president ought to heed their message,” Pelosi said. “We should not be obliged to an open-ended war.”


  1. Jane Troy

    There is no size surge that would improve the situation in Iraq. Any effort to do anything besides leave Iraq pdq will add to the disaster we have caused there. I’m sure you understand this.

  2. Blake Gergen

    Now that Bush has made the intentional mistake of getting us into this mess we are going to be in Iraq for a long time (think 14 permanent bases and the worlds largest embassy which are still under construction). All posturing aside, the Democrats will ultimately cave in and let the president do what he wants knowing full well if they don’t, this will be played as not supporting the troops in the Bush bought, conservative-owned media. Of course the real reason we are staying is obvious with big oil wanting the bonanza they believe Iraq and ultimately Iran’s petroleum will provide, as well as the PNAC warmongers wanting to fulfill their pipe dreams of empire. The real losers are: we the American people who will suffer more death, dismemberment and psychological problems of loved ones; as well as the draining of our treasury, and the Iraqi people who are getting slaughtered by the thousands each month in sectarian violence and who have no access to oil revenue which can put them to work to repair their country’s destroyed infrastructure.