Palin, you have no idea what the 1960s were like so shut up about Bill Ayers.

I wasn’t a radical like Bill Ayers, but I knew young men and women very much like him. While I disagreed with violent protests, what we’d be justified in calling domestic terrorism today, I understood their motivations very well. I was a student at Michigan State, one of the primary campuses where the anti-war movement took shape (link)*. I was an anti-war protester and leader of my graduate department’s student anti-war group. I knew several members of the SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) and very possibly a Weatherman or Black Panther, at least to say hello to. Did that make me a pal of terrorists? Hardly.

There’s no proof Barack Obama and Bill Ayers are or were anything but associates in one or two endeavors, and neighbors.

Palin, and subsequently Republican pontificaters, are making a big point about the New York Times article “Obama and ’60s Bomber: A Look Into Crossed Paths”, studiously ignoring the last two words of the headline and the text which explains that their association was minimal.

But that begs the issues. So what if they were now really close buddies? Ayers by any accounts is as patriotic an American today as any of us, McCain and Palin included.

To understand the fear and fervor that led to people like William Ayers to engage in violent anti-war protests you’d either have to have been there or be a pretty damn good historian of the era.

McCain wasn’t there. He was being the good soldier, aviator in his case, following the family tradition, no doubt believing in the rightness of the cause. Of course he missed the anti-war movement entirely having been a POW.

Palin, had she been old enough, would probably have been one of the “America, Love it or Leave It” types who believed in the mantra “our country right or wrong” pro-war zealots.

But in those days we were zealots on both sides.

Few people had no opinion.

I remember one pro-war man got so enraged at anti-war protesters that he drove his car through a march of some 20,000 men, women and children as it made its way from the university to the state capitol building. He injured several people.58,260 names are carved in polished black granite on the Vietnam Memorial Wall thanks to American politicians, and there would likely have been more if there was no public hue and cry to get the hell out.

I once got out of a movie and smelled tear gas wafting in the wind. I looked up the street and saw crowds of police and students, I saw rocks hurled and windows of stores being broken.

On another occasion I watched a group of students come into the student union with their heads all bloody. They been at a small protest where the police had beaten them with billy clubs because they wouldn’t disperse.

Undercover FBI and police agents not only infiltrated student groups but tried to incite groups wanting to protest peacefully into committing violent acts. Peaceful demonstrators were always being photographed from rooftops, we now know, by members of what was called the Michigan State Police Red Squad.

This was a time of us against them and the “them” was the United State government. The “them” was drafting us and sending us to kill, die or be maimed in a useless war.

As students we studied this, and in many cases we knew more than the general public who were being fed propaganda.

I managed to stay out of the military as did most of my student friends, but we watched others not lucky enough to get low lottery numbers or deferments ship out, some never to return, and others to come back as broken human beings.

In my own career as the director of a mental health center a decade later I started one of the first PTSD treatment programs for Vietnam veterans which wasn’t part of the Veteran’s Administration. (Eventually I contracted with the VA to pay for a therapist. * see below)

The next worst thing to being there or having lost a loved one in the war was having a vet with PTSD who you were close to. My staff and I got to know many veterans very well. They brought the war home in the form of severe PTSD and their struggles and suffering profoundly effected us.

Our evening therapy groups never ended on time and usually spilled out into the parking lot where members stayed on to talk after I had to lock up and go home myself. The police never minded since some of our members were police officers themselves.

Our program helped a lot of vets but we also had a suicide, a spouse’s suicide, a suicide homicide, and a death from agent orange caused cancer. And that was the worst. I got to know many vets who despite the best therapy possible would live with indelible scars, memories not only of the typical horrors of war but of things they did that they could never forgive themselves for.

So, Sarah Palin, just shut up about Bill Ayers. You don’t know anything.


* Michigan State anti-war protests

The book “Campus Wars: The Peace Movement at American State Universities in the Vietnam Era.” chronicles the anti-war protest movement at Michigan State University and several other state universities. Almost all the Michigan State professors and students described in this book review I knew or knew of.

Michigan State University gained notoriety with a 1966 Ramparts Magazine article. It was a cover story with a drawing of Vietnamese first lady Madame Nhu as a MSU cheerleader, “The University on the Make”. This article is “a specific, if shocking, documentation of the degree of corruption and abject immorality attending a university which puts its academic respectability on lend-lease to American foreign policy.” The article exposed the cooperation between MSU and the CIA that occurred during the 1960’s.

**My experience with Vietnam vets a decade after the war.

Picture: Nov. 4, 1982 Ingham County News, articles about Mason Mental Health’s Vietnam vets program. In 1982, the Mason Mental Health Center was one of the first programs to receive a grant from the Veterans Administration to operate a program to treat Vietnam veterans suffering from delayed post traumatic stress disorder. In fact, I believe we were one of only two community mental health centers to receive such a grant. Eventually the VA itself opened outreach programs themselves all over the country, and programs like ours were phased out.

Our program began in November of 1981 without any involvement with the VA. Not a veteran myself, I had been working with a few Vietnam combat veterans in therapy. They were involved in a Vietnam veterans' organization and were contacted by the local PBS television station, WKAR in East Lansing, MI, to put together a group to take phone calls at the station after they aired a special on post Vietnam stress syndrome.

They suggested that I be one of the resource people available, not to take calls, but to assist those vets who were. The phone calls began to pour in after the program and I decided on the spot to offer a group at Mason Mental Health for any vets who wanted to attend. A few nights later 25 showed up for the first of many vets groups, and spin-off groups for spouses of vets.

That was how we did business in those days. If we saw a need, we tried to met it. We weren't volunteers, one of "the thousand points of light." We were paid for what we did, but we did it because it needed to be done. The real heroes of the Vietnam veterans programs were the clients themselves. They hung together and helped each other through touch times as they dealt with inner demons.

One man in particular went on to be appointed to the Governor's Agent Orange Commission where he distinguished himself, until he succumbed to a cancer that was probably caused by agent orange. I am certain he would give me permission to publish his name as he made no secret of having been part of the Mason Mental Health program as a client. I still have to maintain his confidentiality, but those who read this will know who he is.

I would have liked to keep the program independent from the VA, but I knew that I needed to hire a Vietnam veteran who was also a professional psychotherapist, and there weren't many of them around. So when VA funds became available I wrote the grant and we were able to hire the first of several dedicated therapists.

Unfortunately, the VA took over much of the control of the program and while it continued almost until Mason Mental Health closed, our relationship with the VA was never very good. They insisted on approving clients before we saw them, even for first time emergency sessions that we were willing to do for free. We had to attend regular meetings at a VA center 60 miles away, and our therapists ended up having two supervisors. One hated bureaucracies and the other seemed to thrive in one of the biggest bureaucracies in the government. One knew his therapists could empathize with Vietnam veterans far better than he could and the other... well, I'm sure you get the idea.


Please read and adhere to the posting rules of Capitol Hill Blue and the additional rules and guidelines for commenting on this column here. If you think a posting violates these rules click “submit spam” and the message will be highlighted in pink for me to review.

59 Responses to "Palin, you have no idea what the 1960s were like so shut up about Bill Ayers."

  1. Kibitzer  October 6, 2008 at 2:03 pm

    War wounds, opened up again….sad, bad, tragic stuff.

    What Gov. Palin doesn’t understand is that the can of worms that she has opened up leads ineluctably to some of her own current supporters, in the war industry (aka the military-industrial complex), who would love there to be more of the same under a Repub administration. (Think Halliburton; KBR; etc etc ad nauseam.)

    Not that the Demos don’t have their own skeletons rattling away, needing to be put to rest, aka closure; after all, it was LBJ who led the opening up of the Vietnam War to its full potential, of a nice, ongoing money spinner. Never mind the grunts. They’re just cannon fodder. What is REALLY important is propping up the capitalist system with wars and competition and such. Gov. Palin should read Antony Sutton sometime, to get a handle on what the Vietnam War was really all about, and find out about all the American corporations that were making fortunes selling materiel to the Soviet Union that was then used against their own people in the war.

    Did I say “their own people”? Sorry. Since they don’t have a sense of being true Americans – the word globalists comes to mind; Have Business, Will Travel – that attitude really wouldn’t have intruded into the equation. And it was that awareness, however inchoate at the time, that the Vietnam anti-war activists were trying to bring to the public’s attention. And that exercise in conscioussness-raising continues into our time.

    Do your homework, Gov. Palin, before casting stones. As it were.

  2. sherry  October 8, 2008 at 1:43 am

    Ayers was prosecuted. He got off due to prosecutorial misconduct. He was illegally wiretapped and the damning evidence against him was thrown out. Therefore, no case.

  3. Flapsaddle  October 6, 2008 at 10:52 am

    Strange how perspectives differ, isn’t it?

    Following my return from an extended time across the water – where I could attest to the effects of small-arms fire, grenades, heavy MG rounds, shrapnel, Claymores, flechettes, etc. – I got back to graduate school and had to deal with campus protests from clueless people who had no concept of the real meaning of the term “in harm’s way” involved. For me they were a nuisance rather than an example of any moral clarion; I ignored them up to the point where they got in my face.

    In two instances, I was forced to personally perform an attitude adjustment on protesters who thought their freedom to demonstrate included the freedom to trash my research work and to bar my access to lab and classroom facilities. After each such incident, I found that their desire to act as vehicles of protest was considerably diminished.

    Most sincerely,

    T. J. Flapsaddle

  4. sherry  October 6, 2008 at 10:53 am

    Hal, are you suggesting she campaign in a Janet Reno costume, to kinda lose her edge? :)
    They poked fun of Hillary’s pantsuits. Made comments about the Clinton’s “ugly” daughter.
    Regardless of what happens with Obama’s career, he daughters are adorable.
    I wonder if dems are unahppy because well, no one would accuse Michelle of being beautiful. She is not unattractive, but she doesn’t look like the homecoming queen. Is that what all this is about?
    If you don’t agree with Palin, it’s all good. Let’s just stop talking about her looks.

  5. JerryG  October 6, 2008 at 11:16 am

    Palling around??? Palling around would be flying in a friend’s plane to vacation at his house in the Bahamas. Palling around would be, oh say, being an investor in a buddies construction venture. Palling around would be graciously attending the $1000 a plate dinner your buddy is hosting for you to be re-elected.

    Oops! I must be confusing the John McCain and Charles Keating relationship with an imaginary one conjoured up by the grasping-at-straws-GOP’ers!

  6. griff  October 6, 2008 at 11:23 am

    Those same “revolutionaries” have seen fit to not only make peace with the Establishment, but over the last forty years has insisted we do so as well.

  7. bryan mcclellan  October 6, 2008 at 11:44 am

    True children of the 60’s lived in fear that the letter would come welcoming them to join a blood bath.
    I protested the war until I found myself in the middle of the RVN, in the 11th Cavalry.
    I came home to vile insult and spitting of curses such as baby killer, mercenary.( I later was turned away from the good paying jobs because I had the stigma of Viet Nam on my resume).
    The Army in it’s screwed logic then trained me in the tactics of crowd control in D.C.
    I had to stand with bayoneted weapon in a line of green troops attempting to quell protesters.
    I’d have turned my weapon upon myself before harming those who were in reality working for myself and my fellow service members benefit.

    The war dogs then and now can kiss my ass and I’ll buy a beer for any who joined in the effort to stop the madness that comes from the M.I.C.

    The wars today are secreted for the fact that 60’s coverage would incite the people once again.

    So if you were born after 1960, all you little Sarahs out there, shut the hell up, for you know nothing of the sacrifice and effort it took to stop the bloodiest and greatest military debacle in our history

  8. pollchecker  October 6, 2008 at 11:45 am

    Just like those so-called “Mavericks”…wink, wink (imitating SP Thursday night).

  9. Hal Brown  October 6, 2008 at 12:17 pm

    I don’t think it is strange at all how perspectives about Vietnam differ.

    Your war experience comes from being there. I don’t know how it is you came to go to Vietnam. I do know about the tragic part of the homecoming because I saw how some people blamed the vets themselves for the war they were against. But by far most people I knew welcomed the vets back with open arms.

    The returning vets I knew and knew about at the time fell into three groups:

    * those still pro-war, some who took an active stance against the anti-war protesters,

    * those who just wanted to get on with their lives, not be reminded of what they experienced, and ignored the protests,

    * and those who were anti-war and joined or sympathized with groups like Vietnam Vets Against the War. When we had teach-ins we always had some speakers who were Vietnam vets.

    My most meaningful experience came from hearing about the war from combat veterans like yourself, a few when they returned, but mostly ten years later. The vets I got to know then were bearing deep emotional scars. Once they got to trust me and my co-therapists they related their experiences in vivid detail often with tears and sometimes were close to having flashbacks.

    The therapy groups, some with 20 or more members, were so powerful I remember them in great detail. Nobody got away with lying or embellishing because if they did others called them on it.

    Even this late because of confidentiality rules I can’t tell about the experiences that were related in therapy except to say I would still be having nightmares if I experienced what some of our group member did.

    Remember I wasn’t a casual listener. I was a therapist who listened in a way that those who haven’t been in therapy with an effective therapist may not fully understand.

    It is hard for me to write about being an empathic therapist, one who listens with their heart as well as their head, one who doesn’t treat clients like names in a schedule book filling a given hour, without sounding immodest. So judge me as you will.

  10. Hal Brown  October 6, 2008 at 12:29 pm

    Thanks for sharing Bryan,

    Read what I wrote to Flapsdaddle above.

    The homecoming, the baby killer shouts and all, were despicable. I know that had I been there I would have been one incident away from taking my rage out on a civilian. I knew vets who did just that. And I know about how the VC were not above hiding a grenade in an infant’s clothing.

    Not reported is what is really happening in Iraq where are troops are also engaged in a war where inconveniently the enemy hides among civilians and doesn’t wear uniforms.

  11. Flapsaddle  October 7, 2008 at 11:20 am

    Not unexpectedly, perceptions seem to be most influenced by our source(s) of information. My own observation is that few people other than those who were there or someone like yourself who played/plays a role in the recovery of some of the affected can really understand it – yet still have considerably different perceptions of it. That’s probably true of all wars ever fought.

    A common fallacy I find is that too many people believe that Vietnam was the fire of Moloch that swallowed up a generation of youth like World War I did. If you look at the numbers, only a third of all draft-age males were even inducted during the Vietnam era, and only a third of them went to Vietnam.

    Another misconception is that the major portion of those who went to Vietnam committed unspeakable atrocities and returned as a drug- or alcohol-dependent derelict unable to cope with life after war. Yes, there were atrocities – war itself is an unspeakable atrocity, and we as a species are all too fond of it – and there were drug and drinking problems. But I’d bet that in reality they were not worse than those found during and after the world wars or Korea were we to have applied the same psychological evaluation tools available after Vietnam.

    Another misconception I find common is that every soldier who went there ultimately became anti-war in general and anti-Vietnam war in particular. That, as you have said above, is not the case. What the war taught me is that few if any wars are ever really justified. There is nothing noble or heroic about them, and they can never rise above being grim necessities of last resort. My own feeling is that Vietnam was a crusade gone awry – an attempt to defeat the demonstrable evils of a totalitarian system by intervening in a civil war where the putative good guys were themselves were representatives of a repressive colonial regime.

    What was interesting to me was that I was perceived by my contemporaries on campus as an anomaly – a vet with no ax to grind, no anti-war attitudes, no drug/alcohol problems, with a family and stability – as I did not fit the pattern they had been told was the sine qua non of the war. It was actually disconcerting and made some of them angry because it challenged their cherished prejudices and preconceptions.

    Most sincerely,

    T. J. Flapsaddle

  12. colocritic  October 6, 2008 at 1:15 pm

    This post isn’t really about your subject matter but does concern the health care all of us seniors or soon to be seniors that read this website should be interested in. This article should be reprinted on the first page of all national newspapers. It’s on the Huffington Post web page this morning.

    McCAIN PLANS TO CUT MEDICARE AND MEDICAID

    John McCain would pay for his health plan with major reductions to Medicare and Medicaid, a top aide said, in a move that independent analysts estimate could result in cuts of $1.3 trillion over 10 years to the government programs.

    The Republican presidential nominee has said little about the proposed cuts, but they are needed to keep his health-care plan “budget neutral,” as he has promised. The McCain campaign hasn’t given a specific figure for the cuts, but didn’t dispute the analysts’ estimate.

    Here is the link:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/06/mccain-plans-to-cut-medic_n_132169.html

  13. ECT.  October 6, 2008 at 6:36 pm

    ECT. of Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario Canada

    A sincere thank you Hal for a well written and true article.

    I remember the 60’s campus anti-war movement. And I recall the many young American anti-war men who came to Canada seeking refuge from that horrendous war.

    The majority of Canadians did not call these young men deserters. The citizens in many communities welcomed them and helped them get established with homes, jobs etc.

    Many Canadian citizens fought the USA Government when they tried to have these young men arrested and shipped back to the USA to stand trial…for not answering the draft.

    In regards to McCain / Palin if American citizens choose to foolishly elect these two misfits…two war mongrels. I will fight my Canadian Government to the best of my ability to not become involved with another of your USA wars.

    Your President Bush and his cronies invaded another Country…Iraq. And look what it has cost the fine good USA citizens. Not only in the lives of far to many young bright men and women. But the returning Veterans are also hurting…from lack of full Government support. The cost of the Iraq War is also horrendous money wise. Money that could well have been used in positive areas such as Education and Health for all USA citizens. But most of all the USA of America has lost it’s beautiful image, and the power it once had. To become the laughing stock of the world is not easy to take…and your citizens get angry. But face facts…USA citizens voted Bush in…and then voted him in for another four years.

    McCain / Palin are Bush’s followers, which Country will they invade?

  14. bryan mcclellan  October 6, 2008 at 6:50 pm

    Thank you ECT, well said, and I wish we could hear more from citizens of other nations at CHB, although the disgust and at the same time the laughter would no doubt be deafening.
    P.S. how’s the Walleye fishing.

  15. Hal Brown  October 6, 2008 at 8:48 pm

    ECT – welcome and thanks for posting.

  16. Helen Rainier  October 6, 2008 at 10:29 pm

    I remember those years very well. I had graduated from high school in 1968 and the war in Vietnam had been going on for a few years already. In fact, I have a cousin who was, at the time, a US Navy pilot who was shot down over Hanoi before McCain was. I wore a POW bracelet with his name on it. After I graduated, I spent a year at college and then moved to Madison, WI, which, Hal, I’m sure you’ll recall was also a hotbed of student protest activity. Am sure you heard of Paul Soglin. I was living in Madison when the US Math Research building was bombed by the Armstrong brothers and one other young student. I remember being able to smell tear gas at my apartment which was a good ten blocks away from the main UW Campus area.

    One night, I went with a staff photographer for one of the Madison daily newspapers as he was shooting photos of a demonstration on the Capitol Square. I became immersed in the “hippie culture” and evolved to the point where I believed then, as now, that war is not an answer but that peace is the more desirable way to live.

    In fact, it was during those years that I came to the conclusion that the world was too screwed up to bring children into it. I vowed I would never have children because the world was too damned crazy and insane.

    I remember the murders of Kent State and the images of the Ohio National Guard in full combat gear patrolling the Kent State campus and the deaths of students.

    This period of time also reinforced my disgust for all things organized — particularly politics and religion. To do this day, I am now a practicing organized religionist (I consider myself a secular humanist) and I have never been a registered member of either political party.

    I am still anti-government but believe that the people of a country are an entity separate of their government. The years have only proven that politicians do not care about the good of the people or the tolerance of those whose lives, politics, and cultures are different from ours.

  17. Helen Rainier  October 7, 2008 at 9:33 am

    This sentence should read: I was living in Madison when the UW (not US) Math Research building was bombed by the Armstrong brothers and one other young student.

    This sentence should read: To do this day, I am NOT (not now) a practicing organized religionist (I consider myself a secular humanist) and I have never been a registered member of either political party.

    Sorry about the typos.

  18. pollchecker  October 7, 2008 at 10:47 am

    Hal, did you see Olbermann’s rant last night about Sarah Palin’s “terrorist” remarks? He hasn’t had a rant like that in a long time and he nailed it. You can watch it at the link below if you missed it.

    Olbermann “Special Comment” On Sarah Palin (VIDEO)

    Also, the AP story about McCain being on the board of a domestic terrorism organization himself is just the tip of the iceberg.

    Think Progress reports this today:

    McCain Voted To Protect Domestic Terrorists Who Carry Out Violence At Abortion Clinics»

    On multiple occasions throughout his career, McCain sought to limit the government’s ability to punish violent anti-choice fanatics by:

    – Voting against making anti-choice violence a federal crime. As the Jed Report notes, McCain voted in 1993 and 1994 against making “bombings, arson and blockades at abortion clinics, and shootings and threats of violence against doctors and nurses who perform abortions” federal crimes.

    – Opposing Colorado’s “Bubble Law.” McCain said he opposed Colorado’s “Bubble Law,” which prohibited abortion protesters from getting within 8 feet of women entering clinics [Denver Post, 2/27/00]. The law was later upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.

    – Voting to allow those fined for violence at clinics to avoid penalties by declaring bankruptcy. NARAL Pro-Chioce America notes that McCain “voted to allow perpetrators of violence or harassment at reproductive-health clinics to avoid paying the fines assessed against them for their illegal acts by declaring bankruptcy.”

    Of course this should be no real surprise considering he selected Palin, who believes that a child who ends up pregnant from incest should carry the child and give birth to her relatives baby. Perhaps McCain’s views on abortion are more extreme than he paints himself and if he gets control of the Supreme Court that could be very dangerous.

  19. Hal Brown  October 7, 2008 at 11:08 am

    Preaching to the choir, the pro-Obama choir, is what Olbermann does, so he doesn’t sway any undecided voters. The 11 minute segment you linked to was spot on as far as I’m concerned, but all but a few people who comment regularly here (probably 5% of the total) would probably agree with me.

    Neither Olbermann, you or me will change the minds of the anti-Obama posters.

  20. sherry  October 7, 2008 at 11:46 am

    Olbermann has gone from thoughtful commentary to just angry. He lost any respect I may have had for him as a journalist when he went for Obama so obviously in the primaries.
    The network has more than earned the derisive moniker, “BSNBC”
    Any reference to the network evokes the eyeroll, as if you would watch that trash?
    And Hal, you are correct, I would NEVER vote for Obama, but it looks as though he will win.
    My dear it promises to be a loooooooong 4 years.

  21. Hal Brown  October 7, 2008 at 11:59 am

    This column will probably be moved to the archives after, hopefully, I have something somewhat original to write after the McCain – Obama town hall encounter (hardly a debate but we’ll see).

    So I want at least one more chance to address the possibility of a President Palin should McCain win and become infirm or die.

    I watched he most recent speech to a rally in Florida.

    I though of the many times we all watch President Bush address the nation in speeches and press conferences, and saw him sitting with world leaders.

    I cringed at his mangling the language and his deer in the headlights looks as many of you also did.

    Now I am forced to envision a President Sarah Palin in the same role.

    I can see wistfully remembering George W. Bush and seeing him as a statesman in comparison.

    I have to believe that the some 41% who think she is qualified to be president aren’t really brain dead, but truthfully it is a stretch for me to do so.

  22. bryan mcclellan  October 7, 2008 at 12:18 pm

    They are all hoping for a chance to peek up her skirt Hal, McCain said it himself, this campaign will not be about the issues, but about hormones and dirt.

    They are less than brain dead as they would chose to surely imperil our country further to elect the cheesecake/mad bomber.

    Sexistracistfascist, it’s the new poetry of the Neoconists.

  23. sherry  October 7, 2008 at 2:21 pm

    Bryan, those voting for McCain are not really for McCain, they are opposing the disaster that is Obama.
    If elected, hopefully McCain will remain a healthy man.
    If not, Sarah may decide she really, really misses Alaska.

  24. jgw  October 7, 2008 at 5:02 pm

    This Ayers thing has me confused. This guy is supposed to be a serious terrorist yet he was, evidently, never prosecuted, nor has he ever been convicted of anything. He did, evidently, found an organization and then, evidently, removed himself when things got strange. Perhaps this is similar to the more recent situation wherein a co-founder of Greenpeace left that organization due to its slide into utter extremism. In any case it would seem that if Ayers has been found, by the political establishment AND law enforcement, as being guilty of nothing then why the problem? Even if Obama was his very best pal it was way after the supposed bad stuff which, in fact, has evidently been not all that bad afterall?

    As has been pointed out these were very strange times. I can remember, for instance, unions marching to keep the war going and the soldiers (their own children) in VietNam dying, rather than home competing for their jobs (ie, they were willing to sacrifice their own for their jobs). one might consider just how strange it was is when you realize that many of the anti-Vietnam ‘love’ generation (hippies, liberals, commies, terrorists, et.al.) have morphed into serious drug warriors and greedy, world class, self absorbed narcissists.

    jgw
    Port Angeles, WA

  25. Hal Brown  October 7, 2008 at 9:52 pm

    Perhaps we’ll see just what the political shelf of this already stale Ayers story is tonight. I hope Obama sends it to the dumpster where it should have been thrown a long time ago.

    Anyone thinking of a future political career has to take seriously the new version of the saying “don’t do or say anything you don’t want to read about on the front page of the New York Times” even years later.

    Now substitute for the Times media like Drudge, Daily Kos, Huffington Post, Free Republic, The National Enquirer, and watch what you say over drinks with someone who could become the next Doug Thompson.

    In a way it’s too bad, because the would be politician may have to avoid talking to their perfectly friendly next door neighbor because of something that might be considered unsavory in their past. Hell, they might have to consider moving.

  26. Ladywolf55  October 8, 2008 at 3:22 am

    Olbermann isn’t the only one in America who’s just plain damn angry. And he has a right to be, given the outrageous behavior both the White House and Congress have pulled the past several years.

    If you think the next four years are going to be long, it can’t hold a candle to how interminable the last 8 years have been with the Bushista Crime Family in charge for those of us who don’t worship at their feet.

  27. 33rdSt  October 6, 2008 at 1:02 am

    As we said back in the day, Hal, Right On!

    Sadly, though, as we also knew back in the day, the folks who didn’t want us thinking too much about what our leaders were doing in Washington, jingoism and pseudo-patriotic pablum were better than actual analysis and real thought! Sarah (is it okay if I call you Sarah, Governor??) seems to have picked up that lesson from history!!

  28. pollchecker  October 6, 2008 at 9:56 am

    Hal, were Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and George Washington Domestic Terrorists or Revolutionaries?

  29. Hal Brown  October 6, 2008 at 9:52 am

    Lieberman asks God to help Palin saying that “with your help and God’s help” she will be the next vice president of the United States. This on TV a few minutes ago as he introduces Palin at a Florida rally.

    “With God’s help?”

    Then Palin invokes God too:

    “God bless America, you guys get it! Thank you!”

    What is it that “you guys get”? That God is on the aside of the McCain/Palin ticket? What is the message if God is on their side, which religious figure is supporting the other side?

    And now she’s lauding a Florida baseball team… next thing I expect she’ll ask God to help them too…

    And then she quotes Obama about air raiding villages in Afghanistan, but I swear every time I hear it I think she’s saying aerating.

    God, she says, also gave Forida natural resources, and thus apparently wants them to “drill, baby, drill”.

    Now she gets back to The New York Times. Regarding her not telling Katie Couric what papers she reads she interjects “I was just trying to keep Tina Fey in business just giving her more information” and says her answer was flippant —

    Then she goes into the NYT article and talks about Barack’s “friends from Chicago”…

    She says one of Obama’s earliest supporters was Bill Ayers, a domestic terrorist…

    She says an Obama spokesman said they were certainly “friendly” – but precision in language isn’t Palin’s strong suit because if it was she’d know this doesn’t make people friends….

    She is clearly showing that a new tactic is to link Ayers with Obama.

    The crowd chants USA repeatedly…

    “There is only one man in this campaign that has really fought for you… and that man is John McCain.”

    That’s the closing, remind everyone of POW McCain.

  30. sherry  October 8, 2008 at 1:51 am

    Reality writes:3) I think you’ve got something backwards… bombing the Pentagon (or any government building) is indeed a logical target, when opposing the government. It may be an act of war, but it is more logical than attacking a public civilian target – that would be much harder to fathom (except to say that an attack on a civilian target truly is terrorism). Actually, though, it is also hard to believe they actually called ahead to make sure no *people* were harmed, only property – but it was their saving grace in the end, as that is one of the main reasons the government decided to not prosecute anyone in the WU.

    You have got to be kidding me that the Pentagon was a “logical” target.
    And as for Liddy, he is a wacko for sure. On the othet hand there are a ton of so called journalists, I wouldn’t mind seeing Liddy or someone take down. Where do I send the list?
    When I something to protest, I write my reprsentatives. As Hal pointed out, people turned against a very good cause because the really stupid people in charge of the good cause created violence in the name of peace. How insane.
    Ayers is a terrorist, no less than Al Qaeda. He needs to be behind bars. And if he was my neighbor, let’s just say we wouldn’t be sharing coffee.

  31. ekaton  October 6, 2008 at 8:54 pm

    This discussion has devolved to the level of adolescence or childish discourse. Please, people. Grow the hell up.

    — Kent Shaw

  32. Hal Brown  October 6, 2008 at 8:58 pm

    Kent, or anybody else, please flag any posts you feel break the posting rules or don’t live up to the guidelines (HERE) by clicking “submit spam”.

  33. sherry  October 8, 2008 at 1:53 am

    Yeah well, Michelle said Hillary can’t run the white house if she can’t run her own house.
    Also said she would like to scratch Bill Clinton’s eyes out.
    Accused the Clintons of being racists.
    Don’t talk to me about McCains attacks.

  34. pollchecker  October 6, 2008 at 10:26 am

    Hal — wasn’t it John McCain in 2000 that said in reference to GW Bush’s lies and attacks….

    “if all you run is negative attack ads you don’t have much of a vision for the future, or you’re not ready to articulate it.”

    I bet since he’s so old and obviously suffering from some form of dementia that he doesn’t even remember saying it.

  35. Klaus Hergeschimmer  October 6, 2008 at 1:34 am

    The Hyperbole coming from the McNuggets Camp from his Retarded Barracuda Attack B*tch is so outragegous even some slightly higher grade Joe-Six packs could see it’s BS. The underwhelming lack of Grey Matter that Palindum exhibits is beyond all rationality.

  36. ekaton  October 6, 2008 at 3:18 am

    “McCain wasn’t there. He was being the good soldier, aviator in his case, following the family tradition, no doubt believing in the rightness of the cause.”

    Yes, while dropping 2000 pound iron fragmentation bombs on innocent people. What a hero! What a role model!

    Kent Shaw

  37. Hal Brown  October 6, 2008 at 7:30 am

    And going back to his officer quarters for a hot meal on a SAFE aircraft carrier. This was a luxury few of the grunts I knew had. They also often saw the bodies of the people they killed. Those brave (or foolhardy) enough to actually aim their M16’s saw what it looked like when 5.56mm bullets ripped through them.

    I don’t mean to diminish the dangers faced by pilots, as many were killed. You can read the statistics here.

    The only pilots in our vets program flew helicopters, and they also saw combat up close.

  38. Hal Brown  October 6, 2008 at 8:08 am

    Added to column:

    Palin, and subsequently Republican pontificaters, are making a big point about the New York Times article “Obama and ’60s Bomber: A Look Into Crossed Paths”, studiously ignoring the last two words of the headline and the text which explains that their association was minimal.

  39. pollchecker  October 6, 2008 at 8:40 am

    Hal, If Sarah Palin was in 2nd grade when Biden was first elected, that means she was still in diapers during the 60’s which means she doesn’t know squat!

    She’s just using typical Republican propaganda tactics…trying to distract people with disinformation and/or change the subject.

    She it truly transparent as being a total airhead.

    BTW, Dometic terrorist? Give me a break! The Oklahoma bomber was a Domestic Terrorist. The leaders of the 60’s movement were revolutionaries.

    This is important as there may be more revolutionaries in the future most likely labeled “domestic terrorists” so they can be whisked up like the so-called foreign terrorists and hauled off to places like Gitmo.

  40. Hal Brown  October 6, 2008 at 9:28 am

    Obama won’t go there, but if we use the accurate term “revolutionaries” we have to logically look at what Ayers and others who used violence, with the intention to blow up things, not people, were revolting against.

    I added a bit more to my column about the campus anti-war movement and how my own university was involved first in promoting the war in an official, if secret, way.

    Ayers and the Weather Underground weren’t trying to use violence to terrorize people. Their methods were the most extreme form of protest. It backfired and led to many people supporting the failed government war policy rather than questioning it.

    It was the growing list of casualties, the draft, the peaceful protests, and the obvious fact that we were losing the war, that led to the drastic change in public opinion.

  41. sherry  October 6, 2008 at 9:16 am

    Ok, I hear ya. I am 47 and was a child in the 60’s. Lost a cousin in Vietnam. Another came back as someone I never really got to know.
    The world looks different to you Hal and I understand. Our family was not in favor of the war, but I can remember by father condemning the violence of the protests.
    That being said, I can’t wrap my head around a guy who bombed the Pentagon to stop the war. I can’t get my head around a man who would say on 9/11/01, no less he is sorry he didn’t do more.
    But it’s not just the way you are downplaying the association. This guy held fundraisers for Obama. Never mind his association with Rezko, “Minister Farakhan” and his Rev Wright, who was the right preacher until he ran for president.
    Show me your friends. I’ll tell you who you are.

  42. Hal Brown  October 6, 2008 at 9:30 am

    There is no hard evidence Obama and Ayers were or are friends. If there was the Republicans would have found it and publicized it. In fact, no matter what anyone thinks of the New York Times, they usually do a good job of investigative reporting. If Obama and Ayers were more than associates they would have documented it.

    Until there is proof positive they could be considered pals, it is a simply wrong to Palin to say they were. If it turns out that they secretly went bowling together or slinked over to each other’s houses to watch a ball game and have a few drinks, then Obama has some explaining to do — not for the friendship, but for the lie about it.

    When Ayers wrote this (see “No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives; In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen” link) he shows a lack of understanding of how the bombings hurt, rather than helped, the anti-war cause.

    Mr. Ayers, who in 1970 was said to have summed up the Weatherman philosophy as: ”Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, kill your parents, that’s where it’s really at,” is today distinguished professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago. And he says he doesn’t actually remember suggesting that rich people be killed or that people kill their parents, but ”it’s been quoted so many times I’m beginning to think I did,” he said. ”It was a joke about the distribution of wealth.”

    Personally I am proud of what I did and given my small role don’t think I could have done more.

    Would I do it again today? I am, and you’re reading it.

  43. RealityBytes  October 6, 2008 at 6:05 pm

    Sherry, there’s a few things you should know…

    1) The worst report includes that Obama ‘launched’ his political career at a ‘meet and greet’ coffee at Ayers’ house, a few blocks from his own… although the local rabbi’s wife said that *their* house was actually the first. Whatever the case, they were not ‘fundraisers’… The only record of fundraising from Bill Ayers is that he contributed $200 to Obama’s campaign – that’s it.

    2) Bill Ayers was indeed a prime mover in the Weather Underground; but ALL of the actions they claim responsibility for were only against *property* – they purposefully called each site in advance to make sure the places were evacuated of people before causing any damage to government property. The one incident that caused a death was done by someone *before* they became associated with WU – The FBI of course tried to associate it with WU themselves, they were using every tactic they could to stamp out opposition to the war (including, incidentally, kidnapping and assassination)

    3) I think you’ve got something backwards… bombing the Pentagon (or any government building) is indeed a logical target, when opposing the government. It may be an act of war, but it is more logical than attacking a public civilian target – that would be much harder to fathom (except to say that an attack on a civilian target truly is terrorism). Actually, though, it is also hard to believe they actually called ahead to make sure no *people* were harmed, only property – but it was their saving grace in the end, as that is one of the main reasons the government decided to not prosecute anyone in the WU.

    4) His words were “I am sorry *we* didn’t do more”, when asked if the peace movement, as a whole, was effective – those words were clearly talking about everyone in the peace movement, including me (I was only 13 at the time of Kent State, but I did what I could – and I agree with that part of what he said, I am very sorry we didn’t do more to stop wars such as Vietnam – and now, the current Iraq war). In a completely separate part of the interview, he says he’s not sorry he participated in bombing government property. The two were conflated together in the lead paragraph, when in fact they were separate ideas.

    In any event, Obama does not claim him as a ‘pal’ or even as a ‘friend’, and states that he thinks those actions were detestable.

    As for determining someone’s character from their friends, how about McCain’s friend G Gordon Liddy?

    Here’s a link:
    http://www.theseminal.com/2008/04/18/time-for-mccain-to-answer-tough-questions/

    here’s an excerpt:
    “Notorious Watergate burglar G. Gordon Liddy is a McCain supporter. In fact, Liddy, who at one time plotted to murder a journalist, has been donating money to McCain for the past decade. Liddy calls McCain “a good, personal friend“. McCain has appeared on Liddy’s radio show. and McCain’s website provides call-in info to Liddy’s show, asking supporters to contact the ex-con.

    Liddy didn’t exactly turn squeaky clean when he emerged from prison. In the mid-1990s, he instructed listeners about the best way to kill federal agents”

    Note – I wasn’t sure about that last part, so I checked to make sure:

    In a press conference responding to the controversy (Associated Press, 4/25/95), Liddy clarified his advice by noting that shooting a federal agent in the head might not be the ideal plan: “So you shoot twice to the body, center of mass, and if that does not work, then shoot to the groin area.”

    Excuse me, what were you saying about what you could tell about McCain from his friends?

  44. Hal Brown  October 6, 2008 at 10:40 am

    Dementia might be a good excuse, and it might be true he is in the early stages. But dementia doesn’t usually make people mean and dishonest and willing to run a dirty smear campaign.

    I see an old man who sees his dreams of reaching the highest pinnacle in American politics being shattered. As he went from being a long shot to actually being the candidate I think he invested virtually his entire self-image in winning.

    I see Palin very differently. She used her charm and ability to engage people to get ahead. Who cares that she set back bright not so pretty and charming women everywhere. This is how you win beauty pageants. Palin now uses this in her stump speech misquoting Madeline Albright: “There’s a place in hell for women who don’t support other women”, but the real quote is “help other women!”

    Now through incredible luck she finds herself the most famous woman in America, if not the world. I’m not sure whether she really thinks she’ll end up as vice president, poised to be president, though she is willing to do everything she can to achieve this.

    But she is going to play the next month for all it is worth.

  45. pollchecker  October 7, 2008 at 10:19 am

    Dementia might be a good excuse, and it might be true he is in the early stages. But dementia doesn’t usually make people mean and dishonest and willing to run a dirty smear campaign.

    I don’t know Hal….I’ve seen a lot of people get awful ornery when they got older. And dishonesty predisposes that you know you are not being honest. If he is suffering from dementia or especially Alzheimer’s, it could have an effect on his knowing truth from perhaps fiction presented to him as fact. Remember the Saturday Night Live skit they had not too long ago about the commercials that seemed to be deliberate lies.

    He often has that blank stare like he’s just not all there.

    Anyways, I believe he has shown us that he is dangerous either way. I mean look at the AP report about his ties to that ultra right wing conservative Iran Contra group.

    Does he really think he can call Obama a terrorist and someone, somewhere in the world would not dig up his true terrorist ties? I mean people in glass houses….right? Now, perhaps Sarah Palin went out on her own with the Ayres thing and didn’t realize she was opening a can of worms into his past background? Then we have the possibility of this dangerous unchecked woman running around DC. Since it’s Halloween, it’s a scary thought.

    Or maybe he just didn’t remember he past affilliations. I don’t want a POTUS that is mentally unbalanced in any capacity.

  46. gazelle1929  October 6, 2008 at 5:58 pm

    “alleges he is friendly” “may have advised”

    So, because a person is friendly with Obama the latter is charged with complicity in the crimes of the former, crimes which were never adjudicated in a court of law and which occurred 40 years ago.

    And because that same person may have advised Obama on matters political he is an advisor. Hell, then so am I, and I have the email to prove I sent Obama political advice. Can you prove that Ayers did likewise or are you just going on what’s being said around the internet. And I would raise the same question with the NY Times.

    These are the sort of tactics that Karl Rove loves and approves of. In this case guilt by minimal association. You certainly have a right to post things like that, just as I and many others here have a right AND an obligation to question anything unseemly, which is what I believe your post was.

  47. Harve3  October 6, 2008 at 12:52 pm

    Did Bill Ayers have the courage of this convictions? Which rich people did he kill? Which houses or apartments or cars did he break up? Did he kill his parents and older brother? Or was he simply advising others to do so in his role as “leader” of a movement or was it actually a joke as he asserts today from his position of responsibility and friend and advisor to the Hon Barack Hussein Obama [D-IL] and candidate for POTUS.

    Hill Country resident

  48. gazelle1929  October 6, 2008 at 1:31 pm

    “as he asserts today from his position of responsibility and friend and advisor to the Hon Barack Hussein Obama [D-IL] and candidate for POTUS.”

    “position of responsibility”

    “friend and advisor”? ? ? ? ?

    Please either support this or retract it.

    Irresponsible accusations such as this have no place on this board (or anyplace else for that matter.)

  49. Harve3  October 6, 2008 at 2:13 pm

    Weather Underground founder William Ayers holds a responsible position in the Dept of Education at UI-Chicago and some allege he is a respected public figure in Chicago politics. Even the NYT alleges he is friendly with the Hon Barack Hussein Obama [D-IL] and may have advised him on matters political. How then are the former comments irresponsible and to be condemned; is the Hon Obama not proud to associate with Mr Ayers?

    Hill Country resident

  50. ekaton  October 7, 2008 at 7:28 pm

    Were any people harmed or killed by Mr. Ayers? If not, how much property damage was done? Was Ayers ever convicted of any criminal charges? I don’t have the answers. I suppose I should google it.

    Isn’t there some possibility that former radical Ayers saw the error of his ways and decided that working within the system is more effective?

    — Kent Shaw

  51. Hal Brown  October 6, 2008 at 5:40 pm

    Even McCain has condemned the use of Obama’s middle name as dirty politics. No reputable publications are using his middle name. Do not use it here.

    It is irresponsible, worse, untruthful to say someone is palling around with someone when there is no evidence top that effect. Saying they are or were friendly isn’t the same as saying they are or were friends.

    The New York Times did not say Ayers gave him political advice, in fact they said “The suggestion that Ayers was a political adviser to Obama or someone who shaped his political views is patently false,” said Ben LaBolt, a campaign spokesman.”

    Palin and other Republicans are using the association between Ayers and Obama to further convey the impression that Obama is not one of us.

    This meshes perfectly with the theme repeated in other ways that McCain/Palin puts “country first”, that God willing McCain/Palin will win. You don’t have to be a weatherman to see which way they want the wind to blow…

  52. Harve3  October 6, 2008 at 7:20 pm

    Did you save in your e-mail account the “thank you note” from the campaign organization of the Hon Barack Hussein Obama [D-IL] for the political advice you volunteered? Meanwhile why is the use of Mr Obama’s given name proscribed here?

    Hill Country resident

  53. gazelle1929  October 6, 2008 at 8:12 pm

    Actually, yes. It is plain to see that you have absorbed yet another Republican tactic, that of misdirection, as you have deflected the discussion from politics to a non sequitor abiut what’s on my hard drive.

    Cannot answer your second question. It’s not my we site.

  54. Hal Brown  October 6, 2008 at 8:42 pm

    Last chance, keep using Obama’s middle name and your entire posts will be deleted. The reasons should be obvious, even McCain understands.

  55. Harve3  October 7, 2008 at 11:52 am

    Well that settles it for me Hal!

    The New York Times did not say Ayers gave him political advice, in fact they said “The suggestion that Ayers was a political adviser to Obama or someone who shaped his political views is patently false,” said Ben LaBolt, a campaign spokesman.”

    A quote from a mouthpiece for the Hon Barack H Obama [D-IL] certainly dispels an allegations of friendship or collusion between the Senator and his colleague William Ayers.

    Hill Country resident

  56. Harve3  October 7, 2008 at 11:44 am

    Yes indeed he enjoyed his office quarters and hot meals on a safe carrier except that time his A-4 was struck by that ground-air missile and augured into a rice patty after which the Hon John Sidney McCain III [R-AZ] then spent several years in solitary confinement in the notorious Hanoi Hilton whilst his several fractures remained untreated a fate few “grunts” confronted and certainly amounted to seeing combat up close.

    Hill Country resident

  57. Hal Brown  October 7, 2008 at 6:11 pm

    Do not think that referring to McCain as you have will permit you to refer to Obama using his middle name. Do not play games here. If you want responses to your posts abide by the rules and guidelines.

    I agree that being a POW was a horrendous experience. I didn’t mean to play that down. However, it makes no sense to compare which was worse, being in combat on the ground or being in a POW camp. Both were bad in different ways.

    If Sarah Palin is going to use Willaim Ayer’s anti-war activities, I would hope she understands the ultimate results in human cost of that war in some detail. The point of my column was Palin not demonstrating any indication she has an in depth, let alone a cursory, knowledge of what the country was like during the Vietnam War.

    For example, she should know the following:

    Most of the Air Force and Navy casualties presumably came when aircraft were shot down. Obviously whether flying or on the ground, combat was dangerous and many died in all the services. However common sense would suggest that the reason pilots and crew who ended up as POWs did so because they were shot down over enemy territory. The POW numbers of Army and Marines (granting some of the later were pilots) suggests those who fought in ground combat didn’t get captured that often. But some 52,000 of them died of the 58,217 total.

    Left to right: No. served Killed Wounded Missing

    USA[2]Army4,368,00038,21896,802617
    Marines794,00014,84051,392242
    Navy1,842,0002,5654,178401
    Air Force1,740,0002,5871,021649
    Coast Guard7590
    Civilians38
    Total8,744,00058,217153,4521,947
    "This table contains the POW Accounted-For status codes followed by the number of servicemen in that category."

    Status CodeArmyAir
    Force
    NavyMarine
    Corps
    Coast
    Guard
    CiviliansTotals
    AR – AWOL/Deserter/Collaborator Returnee1001002
    BR – Body Recovered0000000
    EE – Escapee (Not on State Reports)1712100535
    KR – Died in Captivity, Remains Returned10151070446
    NR – Remains Returned/Remains Recovered17142816178115854
    RR – Returnee (Not on all State Reports)12233214928054685
    Totals3217763221241781622


    "This table contains the Unaccounted-For status codes followed by the
    number of servicemen in that category.">
    Status CodeArmyAir
    Force
    NavyMarine
    Corps
    Coast
    Guard
    CiviliansTotals
    BB – Killed in Action, Body not Recovered27819928113404896
    KK – Died in Captivity, Remains Not Returned225020534
    MM – Missing (Civilians only)000001111
    PP – Prisoner (Civilians only)0000088
    XX – Presumptive Finding of Death258370888106803
    Totals5585743692170341752

    Official government POW statistics.

  58. Harve3  October 7, 2008 at 6:42 pm

    Hal: Thanks for the detail provided for the convenience of the Hon Sarah Palin [R-AK] in preparation for her campaign remarks. OBTW, thanks for the nod concerning the respectful recognition of the Hon John Sidney McCain III [R-AZ] candidate for POTUS; grateful to be able to use his full, given name! Meanwhile, wish you had taken time to mention the US involvement in Viet Nam, including the military conflict, began and continued as a policy of Democrat presidents supervised by Democrat majority Congresses. This correspondent certainly hopes Ms Palin recalls these details when discussing the “anti-wat”[sic] behavior of Weather Underground founder William Ayers, noted academic and Chicago politician.
    Hill Country resident

  59. Hal Brown  October 7, 2008 at 7:15 pm

    There is no need to use these full names. Please refrain from doing so… (on second thought go ahead and do it, but use of Obama’s middle name is not acceptabe here). There isn’t a reader here who doesn’t see through your attempt to disparage Obama through the use of his middle name. Both McCain and Palin and their surrogates have condemned this.

    I will not tolerate any wisenheimer asides from you.

    If you notice a typo like anti-wat just point it out and I will correct it.

    Keep on topic. This isn’t a discussion about how the Vietnam War started and who was responsible.

    I will not waste my time with you unless you post according to my rules and guidelines.

    Case closed.

Comments are closed.