Crisis provides real life test for candidates

The financial crisis has turned into a tryout of sorts for the next president, an unexpected chance for Barack Obama and John McCain to shine — or stumble — just as most voters are deciding whom to back.

At times like these, when the real world intrudes on the carefully controlled campaigns, the spotlight shines even brighter on the presidential candidates. Their responses and postures may tell voters more about how they would act if elected than allegations of lies in advertising and quips about lipstick on pigs.

Both have got some work to do.

"People are confused, they’re scared and they’re angry, and neither of these guys is providing the security, maturity and experience to be able to calm those fears," says Joe Gaylord, a Republican consultant. "If these candidates can rise out of their campaign mode and get into the president-of-all-the-country mode, people would feel more comfortable."

The trick for each is not to look like he’s trying to score cheap political points off a crisis.

Last month, Russia’s invasion of Georgia provided a taste of how outside events can affect the presidential race. McCain seemed to hit his stride more quickly than Obama. In the financial meltdown, the opposite has been true.

Between now and Nov. 4, any number of other domestic or foreign events could intervene. For now, all attention has swung to the financial crisis that has spread worldwide. Despite Friday’s major actions by the federal government, even more economic troubles could be ahead, putting additional pressure on both Obama and McCain to map out solutions and prove they can handle adversity.

Both men are treading carefully as they use the Wall Street chaos not only to sell their economic plans but also to try to sound and act presidential before a nervous nation seeking leadership.

On Friday, Obama struck a stately stance as he acknowledged "difficult days" and said: "This is not the time for fear or panic. This is a time for resolve and for leadership. I know we can steer ourselves out of this crisis. That’s who we are. That’s what we’ve always done as Americans."

After fumbling earlier in the week, McCain’s remarks had a more partisan edge. He claimed Obama "profited from this system of abuse and scandal" — even as he said: "It took members of both parties to get America into this mess, and it will take all of us, working together, to lead the way out."

For now at least, the campaigns have returned to issues and substance after weeks of clashes over personalities and characters. Each candidate has accused the other of lying in campaign commercials, and there was a dispute over whether Obama was insulting GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin when he used the phrase putting "lipstick on a pig."

"The real world was always going to re-exert itself because there are big problems," said Bob Shrum, a Democratic veteran of several presidential campaigns. "Voters were having a lark but now they’re saying to themselves, what’s going happen to me and my life and my family in the next four years, and who is best to lead the country."

Thus, mistakes are magnified.

Take McCain.

As markets tumbled Monday following the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers and the takeover of Merrill Lynch, the Arizona senator — who has acknowledged that economics is not his strongest suit — made his oft-repeated assertion that "the fundamentals of our economy are strong." Democrats swiftly assailed him, tagging him as out of touch and a continuation of President Bush.

McCain has spent the days since trying to explain what he meant and, with a more dire tone, letting voters know that he feels their pain. Now, he’s calling the financial woes "one of the most severe crises in modern times," says he would fire the Securities and Exchange Commission chairman if he were president, and advocates creating a special trust to help strengthen weak institutions.

All week, McCain has struggled to square his current calls for tighter regulation of financial markets with his decades-old support of deregulation.

Obama, meanwhile, has smoothly hit his main points, empathizing with working-class people and blaming Washington.

He huddled with a team of seasoned economic advisers in Florida on Friday, and had planned to outline a series of prescriptions. But he emerged from the meeting to announce he would hold off for now in deference to those dealing directly with the crisis, saying their work should be "unimpeded by partisan wrangling."

The candidates’ roles were reversed in August when Russia sent troops and tanks into the former Soviet state of Georgia.

That overseas event ricocheted off the U.S. presidential campaign, as foreign relations and national security — historically Republican strengths — rose to the surface.

McCain quickly took a hardline stand against Russia, seeking to show prowess in dealing with an international crisis.

Obama was initially cautious. He called for diplomacy and restraint on all sides.

Republicans chastised him for not sounding tough enough, and Obama labored to find the right balance.

A few days later, his position hardened markedly as he called for a Russian cease-fire and said, "Now is the time for action — not just words."

That situation reverberated on the campaign trail for about a week.

There’s no formula for how long a current event remains, well, a current part of the campaign.

And, it’s hard to predict just how big an event has to be for candidates to care.

Wednesday’s attack on the U.S. Embassy in Yemen, for instance, hardly registered. Both candidates simply issued statements.

In 2004, war and terrorism were injected into the campaign’s final weekend — a videotaped message from Osama bin Laden surfaced and eight U.S. Marines died in Iraq. Bush barely beat Democrat John Kerry.

And, forty years ago, Lyndon B. Johnson stopped bombing North Vietnam and pressed for peace negotiations — just days before voters narrowly chose Republican Richard Nixon over Democrat Hubert Humphrey.

There are six weeks left to go.


Liz Sidoti covers the presidential campaign for The Associated Press and has covered national politics since 2003.


  1. woody188

    That question will never make it through their handlers filters. Instead we’ll get to ask who we should pray for like when they announced the start of fighting in Iraq.

  2. ekaton

    I want to hear each explain in detail, and in easily understood terms, what is a “credit default swap”.

    — Kent Shaw

  3. JudyB

    Both candidates should quit telling what they would do in regards to solving this financial mess.

    Until it is announced and they know just exactly what the grand poohbahs plan is, they won’t even know what they are dealing with….and trust me folks it will be a whole new ballgame with different rules that they will be dealing with!

    For them to offer any answers now is like a doctor giving the patient a perscription without knowing the malady.

  4. Malibu

    I hate being considered a dupe for my government’s terrible actions. I have talked about the value of the American dollar for many years and people look at me as if I’m an alien to this world. I have lost friends when I ask them what they would do if their entire savings was worth only half of what they paid in. I was called a Communist several years ago when I was worried about the incompetance of President Bush. When I looked at his opposition, I simply wrote in Ron Paul. I really feel that Dr. Paul is the only candidate who understands this financial mess that the Dems and GOP got us into.

    It is way over the heads of the LP, Green Party and certainly Chuck Baldwin’s Constitution Party.


  5. ekaton

    Exactly, Malcolm, exactly. Most banking regulations implemented after the great depression were designed to, basically, prohibit fraud. Now the regulations have mostly been repealed and fraud has been perpetrated on a massive scale. And, now, the taxpayers are expected to pay for it. I am enraged. You have no idea how enraged I have become. I have literally been throwing things and screaming. If the general population could be made aware of exactly how these financial manipulations work they would be hanging the perpetrators from the nearest lamp poles. A $700 billion dollar bailout my ass. It’ll be trillions. And, breaking NOW, on MSNBC, we are being told that Paulson wants to extend the “bailout” to FOREIGN BANKS. MY TAX DOLLARS ARE GOING TO BAIL OUT FOREIGN BANKS. RAGE RAGE RAGE RAGE

    — Kent Shaw