Palin’s husband refuses to testify

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s husband has refused to testify in the investigation of his wife’s alleged abuse of power, and key lawmakers said Thursday that uncooperative witnesses are effectively sidetracking the probe until after Election Day.

Todd Palin, who participates in state business in person or by e-mail, was among 13 people subpoenaed by the Alaska Legislature. Palin’s lawyer sent a letter to the lead investigator saying Palin objected to the probe and would not appear to testify on Friday.

"The objections boil down to the fact that the Legislative Council investigation is no longer a legitimate investigation because it has been subjected to complete partisanship and does not operate with the authority that it had at the time of its initial authorization," McCain-Palin presidential campaign spokesman Ed O’Callaghan said.

Sarah Palin initially welcomed the bipartisan investigation into accusations that she dismissed the state’s public safety commissioner because he refused to fire her ex-brother-in-law, a state trooper. "Hold me accountable," she said.

But she has increasingly opposed it since Republican presidential candidate John McCain tapped her as his running mate. The McCain campaign dispatched a legal team to Alaska including O’Callaghan, a former top U.S. terrorism prosecutor from New York to bolster Palin’s local lawyer.

In the letter, Palin attorney Thomas Van Flein lists nine objections to the Legislature’s investigation into Gov. Palin. Van Flein also argues the subpoena is "unduly burdensome" because Palin has travel plans that require him to be out of the state.

Earlier this week, Alaska Attorney General Talis Colberg said the governor, who was not subpoenaed, declined to participate in the investigation and said Palin administration employees who have been subpoenaed would not appear.

State Sen. Bill Wielechowski, a Democrat, said the McCain campaign is doing all it can to prevent the Legislature from completing a report on whether the GOP’s vice presidential nominee abused her power as governor.

Wielechowski and another member of the panel that summoned the witnesses, told The Associated Press that the witnesses can avoid testifying for months without penalty and that court action to force them to appear sooner is unlikely.

Republican Sen. Gene Therriault agreed with Wielechowski’s analysis.

"If we had turned the rhetoric down and turned the pressure down to do some things we might have gotten voluntary cooperation," said Therriault, who opposed the subpoenas.

The McCain-Palin campaign said Thursday that Gov. Palin is cooperating with a separate Alaska State Personnel Board investigation into Troopergate. Palin initiated that investigation after she joined McCain’s ticket. The three-member board is appointed by the governor.

"I can’t say it enough, the governor is an open book on this matter," McCain spokeswoman Meg Stapleton said. "She is fully cooperating with the unbiased, legally appropriate and independent investigation of the State Personnel Board."

Palin fired Walt Monegan in July. It later emerged that Palin, her husband, Todd, and several high-level staffers had contacted Monegan about state trooper Mike Wooten. Palin maintains she fired Monegan over budget disagreements, not because he wouldn’t dismiss her former brother-in-law.

Wooten had gone through a nasty divorce from Palin’s sister before Palin became governor. While Monegan says no one from the administration ever told him directly to fire Wooten, he says their repeated contacts made it clear they wanted Wooten gone.

Alaska Senate President Lyda Green, a Republican foe of Palin, said Wednesday that the investigation is still on track.

"The original purpose of the investigation was to bring out the truth. Nothing has changed," she said.

Without the testimony, the retired prosecutor hired to head the investigation could still release a report in October as scheduled, based on the evidence he’s already gathered. As of Thursday, Steven Branchflower had interviewed or deposed 17 of the 33 people he had identified as potential witnesses in the probe.

The Legislature does not have the leverage to compel any witness to testify before Nov. 4, said Wielechowski, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Wielechowski said he did not know whether Branchflower has enough material for a complete and fair report with so few witnesses. But he said delaying the probe would only politicize the matter more.

"It would be to appease the McCain camp," Wielechowski said. "They’re doing everything they can to delay."

Ignoring a legislative subpoena is punishable by a fine up to $500 and up to six months in jail under Alaska law. But courts are reluctant to intervene in legislative matters and the full Legislature must be in session to bring contempt charges, Wielechowski said. The Legislature is not scheduled to convene until January.


  1. gazelle1929

    You know, Rockpyle, I read everything preceding this and I see nothing that can be described as hatred.

    “She has not abused her power and the facts bear this out.”

    Here we have a woman whose husband apparently participated in making the wheels go round on the Alaska bus and he refuses to testify about what he may have done. Governor Palin at first said she would cooperate and then said she would not. Little Miss Flipper might well describe her.

    Though you may not be aware of it, subpoenas and sworn testimony are two of the most important pillars of our legal system. We’ve seen this stuff before, where people who have something to hide come up with fallacious argument for considering a subpoena to be invalid and refusing to testify.

    There is a word for this: contempt of court (or contempt of the legislature if it is a subpoena from the legislature requiring sworn testimony.

    You said the facts bear out that she has not abused her powers. Tripe. Balderdash. Hogspit. There is a subpoena out for Mr. Palin’s required testimony. Until a court of competent jurisdiction quashes the subpoena that man is in contempt.

    What do you think would happen if you were subpoenaed to testify and you refused. You would find your sorry butt in jail where you belong. Flouting subpoenas and search warrants is ILLEGAL. Let me repeat that. ILLEGAL.

    The action of refusing that subpoena is to those of us who are thinking somewhat clearly is a clear abuse of power on the part of the Palins. If they have nothing to hide they can testify. If they believe their testimony would criminally implicate them they can plead the Fifth Amendment.

    But refusing a subpoena (and suborning or abeting another in so refusing) is just plain morally and legally wrong.

    You are the one who is out of touch.

  2. rockpyle

    The haters making all of these negative comments are pathetic. You all are running scared because your chosen one is *ACTUALLY* going to lose this election. You all thought you had this election in the bag because the main stream media is in your corner.

    Gov. Palin has an 86% approval rating in Alaska (75% among Democrats). She has not abused her power and the facts bear this out. It’s funny to see how investigative journalism in the main stream media has much improved in the past month because it’s difficult to find anyone in the state of Alaska that has a bad thing to say about her.

    You watch, some of you are going to be critical of the people of Alaska as being lesser-Americans because they value different things in life than the elitist, out of touch liberals do.

  3. adamrussell

    Theyre saying now that Alaska has a law that says you cant supoena someone that is in the middle of an election. What a world!