The campaign to nowhere

Mea culpa. I am just not very good at this campaign stuff. Those much more adept than I pulled me, along with most of America, into talking about Sarah Palin rather than the real problems we should be discussing, so I admit my error and am making amends by returning to what is real. I wish the candidates would as well – especially Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin who seem to have decided issues don’t matter.

I will only list two of what I think are major problems that could use some serious thought and debate:

1. Our economy, despite yet another government bailout, is seriously overburdened with debt, both governmental and personal. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that our national debt this year will leap to $407 billion. Foreclosures continue to engulf hundreds of thousands of Americans in devastating losses and debt from which many will never recover. Credit card debts has reached levels that make many one bad illness away from bankruptcy.

Where are the plans for brining fiscal responsibility to the table? What would the candidates do to rebuild the economy, convince Americans to reject runaway consumerism, and bring our budget back to a positive balance?

What can or should be done, in the candidates opinions, about the growing shift of wealth to the very richest of the rich?

2. The so-called “war on terror” is failing miserably. Forget this schoolyard taunting about the “surge” and let us engage in some serious discussions. We are turning more and more young people around the world into potential terrorists by our misplaced reliance on bombs and weapons that end up killing so many civilians that we have lost nearly all credibility with the people we said we wanted to winnow from terrorism.

In Afghanistan repeated “miscues” have maimed and injured thousands upon thousands of women, children and men who were doing nothing more than existing in the wrong spot with an American rocket blasted them to bits. We have failed to rebuild the infrastructure we promised them in exchange for all this bloodlust. We have repeatedly acted just like the Soviets we helped them eject and forced the people to return to harvesting the largest opium crop in history.

In Pakistan we are contributing to the instability of the government now headed by a self-avowed madman by repeated cross-border bombings and incursions. We placed all our marbles with Gen. Musharraf and then failed to back that up with a broad-based attack on the real causes of jihadism.

Here at home the former 9/11 commission members report that we have failed to act responsibly to prevent attacks on our chemical, nuclear and biological weapons systems. We are apparently meant to be satisfied that all is well now that we have to remove our shoes at airport gates.

So can we move beyond the diversions of this campaign and make certain each of the four candidates answers how they would address these two issues, in depth and with some real insight into how they propose to govern the nation? Can we please get some help in this from the press, especially those who get on-air interview time with the candidates?

Let’s get this back on track to what is real and focus on our future, less on their personal pasts.

5 Responses to "The campaign to nowhere"

  1. bryan mcclellan  September 9, 2008 at 7:54 pm

    Careful Phil, you are close to being accused of being a thinker and a solutionist, neither of which the media or homeland security have time for right now.

    In the immortal words of Chertof, Off with their shoes!

  2. Phil Hoskins  September 9, 2008 at 11:00 pm

    Always have had that failing, Bryan

    Phil Hoskins

  3. bryan mcclellan  September 10, 2008 at 12:01 am

    Since Obama has appeared on Countdown I’m wondering if McCain will do likewise. I really feel that Olberman could restrain himself and get some constructive insight into the inner workings of the Republican candidate.

    Hows that for fiction?

    I and many who follow politics know that what drives the dis-information trash truck is the insular atmosphere in which the runners are allowed to work their message.

    Would that it be mandatory for all candidates to appear on all the media forums (equal time), totally unscripted and address the issues/party platform, with all but personal family matters in play thereby tightening up the loose ends for the voters.

    This would be one sure way to stop the lying and smear tactics that pit networks against one another and surely serve to keep the candidates from the dreaded campaign killer, the flippity flop.

    In the end we should be able to count on honesty from the media but we’ll never get it without devising and revising the approach to suit the slipperiness of the politicians.

    Now for a little non fiction, I’d really like to see Olberman on the Factor and Billo on countdown.

    My ledge is getting smaller all the time.

  4. RichardKanePA  September 10, 2008 at 2:37 am

    RichardKanePA

    If McCain really admires his Admiral Father, and thinks that the basic problem is that US’s enemies don’t fear the US enough, than it isn’t a side issue.

    If Sarah Palin really thinks “US Troops are fighting for God”, in Iraq and McCain saw evil in Vietnam and thus knows how to fight it, than her thinking other nations are Satanic is a legitimate election concern. All the personal gossip about her may indicate she really meant what she said about “fighting for God”.

    But I feel for what Phil is saying. We are, I think, heading for a depression from currency meltdown far worse under McCain. But if Obama is president people will nevertheless blame him for a far milder depression, since they won’t have the McCain depression to compare it with.

    So I feel for Phil’s desire to present the real world, but people don’t want to think about a grim future. So it’s hard for people to even finish reading what Phil has to say much less think about it. I wrote a lot of grim news but people won’t read it. If you want to be grim, Google RichardKanePa

  5. ekaton  September 10, 2008 at 11:38 am

    “The Congressional Budget Office estimates that our national debt this year will leap to $407 billion.”

    Surely you meant to say “leap BY $407 billion” since the national debt is currently stated to be nearly $10 TRILLION dollars. Many people confuse the yearly deficit with the total national debt. And, I do not believe this year’s deficit will be limited to $407 billion dollars. Are you sure the CBO didn’t say that this year’s deficit will be $407 billion dollars MORE THAN LAST YEAR’s deficit?

    I agree wholeheartedly with the rest of your message.

    – Kent Shaw

Comments are closed.