Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Taliban back in control in Afghanistan; Iraq death toll mounts

By
October 7, 2006

The Taliban has returned to power in southern Afghanistan while stepped up violence in Iraq is adding record numbers to the body count — two bloody examples of President George W. Bush’s failed wars in both countries.

In Afghanistan, The Associated Press reports:

A sweating man wanders into a crowd and blows himself up, leaving a dozen bodies lifeless on the street. A few blocks away, a car bomb pulverizes an armored Humvee, killing two U.S. soldiers and 14 civilians. The kind of anonymous insurgent violence that is convulsing Iraq has migrated 1,500 miles east to plague Afghanistan five years after the U.S.-led invasion that toppled the Taliban regime.

The prospect of a second downward spiral — though so far Afghanistan isn’t nearly as violent as Iraq — has experts worried that Western militaries don’t have an effective strategy for these irregular wars.

"One Iraq is bad enough," said Bruce Hoffman, a counterinsurgency expert at Georgetown University. "Given that our two main theaters of operations aren’t going well, one has to question how well the U.S. understands counterinsurgency."

The reborn Taliban acknowledges that it has adopted the suicide bombings, beheadings and remote-controlled bombs of the Iraqi insurgent movement. Nearly 200 civilians have been killed in suicide attacks this year that look all too much like the wave of bombings sweeping Iraq.

"We’re getting stronger in every province and in every district and every village," said Qari Mohammed Yusuf Ahmadi, who calls himself the Taliban’s spokesman for southern Afghanistan. "We don’t have helicopters and jet fighters. But we’re giving America and its allies a tough time with roadside bombs, suicide attacks and ambushes. Our Muslim brothers in Iraq are using the same tactics."

Resemblances to Iraq don’t stop there. Taliban public relations teams videotape attacks and post them online, an uncharacteristic venture into modern technology for a Muslim fundamentalist group that once banned cameras and computers.

The West’s military strategy in Afghanistan also resembles that in Iraq.

Just as critics say Washington did not send enough troops to Iraq before the insurgency took root, analysts fault the U.S. for failing to press its advantage in Afghanistan in 2002 and 2003 when the Taliban were all but vanquished.

Meanwhile, Afghan observers say the same harsh U.S. tactics, decried in Iraq for causing civilian casualties, have helped the Taliban recruit new fighters.

But unlike Iraq’s insurgents, the Taliban has ready sanctuary and support just outside their battle zone, in the border areas of Pakistan.

"There will be no end to this insurgency until its sanctuaries and external support are addressed," said Christopher Alexander, the deputy head of the U.N. Assistance Mission in Afghanistan.

The U.S. military estimates about 6,000 Taliban and other insurgent fighters operate in Afghanistan, many from bases in Pakistan. Yusuf Ahmadi — who spoke by satellite phone from an undisclosed location and whose exact ties to the militia’s leadership are unclear — put the figure in the tens of thousands.

The Taliban comeback, while focused on the volatile south and east, has begun to hit Kabul. The mountain capital’s tree-lined boulevards are now scarred, like the streets of Baghdad, by garlands of razor wire, towering blast walls and impromptu police checkpoints.

There’s little indication that Iraqi insurgents are joining the fight in Afghanistan or giving the Taliban direct aid, although a few Arab and Chechen fighters mingle in Taliban ranks.

But even without much personal contact, the Taliban has learned from Iraq’s insurgency. Web sites explain the insurgent’s art: everything from concealed rocket launchers to roadside bomb-making.

"We’re not saying they’re getting direct support from Iraq," a U.S. military official in Afghanistan said on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity the information. "They’ve evolved by adapting their tactics. They’ve seen the value of the suicide bomber in Iraq. For them, it’s a very cheap and effective weapons system."

The U.S. and NATO military response in Afghanistan also has nuanced differences from Iraq. U.S. warplanes drop 10 times more bombs in Afghanistan than they do in Iraq, and a few U.S. and NATO troops live off base in village houses, a strategy rarely attempted in Iraq.

But most of the allied war efforts looks similar. In both places, troops cordon off villages and search homes. They employ billions of dollars in technology — things like signal jammers and mine-clearing vehicles — to find and disarm roadside bombs. They operate from bases nearly identical in appearance, with troops living in tin trailers barricaded by dirt-filled metal baskets.

The Afghan war is still far smaller, occupying just 40,000 allied troops — a quarter of those in Iraq — and suffering a fraction of the casualties. But for individual soldiers serving in mountainous Taliban lands like Zabul province, the dangers feel the same.

"I know Iraq grabs a lot of headlines. But there’s still a war going on over here," said Lt. Col. Steve Jarrard, 46, of Johnson City, Tenn., based in the hard-bitten southern town of Qalat. "I really hope we’re doing the right thing over here."

Right now, it’s too early to tell the result of major U.S. and NATO offensives aimed at crushing the Taliban.

"In three to six months you’ll see a noticeable effect," said NATO spokesman Maj. Luke Knittig. "But you’re talking two to five years before seeing a defeat of the insurgency" in southern Afghanistan.

In Iraq, the violence increases along with the death toll of both Americans and Iraqi civilains:

As the AP reports from Baghdad:

Eleven people were killed in scattered violence around Iraq on Saturday, including eight who died when a suicide car bomber hit an Iraqi army checkpoint in the northern city of Tal Afar.

In Baghdad, where sectarian violence between Shiites and Sunni Arabs has been rising steadily, two bullet-riddled bodies were pulled from the Tigris river in the downtown Karrada neighborhood, said police Lt. Bilal Ali Majid. Both had their hands and legs bound and showed signs of torture — hallmarks of the sectarian death squads that roam the capital.

The suicide bomber hit the checkpoint at 8:45 a.m. in Tal Afar, 260 miles northwest of Baghdad, said Mosul police Col. Abdel-Karim al-Jubouri. Four soldiers and four civilians were killed in the attack, and another six people were wounded.

In Mosul itself, unidentified gunmen killed a woman who was walking with her 5-year-old son, al-Jubouri said. The boy was not harmed, he said.

Another two civilians were killed and four more wounded when a mortar shell hit a house before dawn in Iskandariyah, 30 miles south of Baghdad, Police Capt. Muthana Khalid said.

The Washington Post reports the week has been especially rough on Americans:

Thirteen U.S. soldiers have been killed in Baghdad since Monday, the American military reported, registering the highest three-day death toll for U.S. forces in the capital since the start of the war.

The latest losses – four soldiers who were killed at 9 a.m. Wednesday by small-arms fire in northwest Baghdad – are part of a recent spike in violent attacks against U.S. forces that have claimed the lives of at least 24 soldiers and Marines since Saturday, the military said.

As of Wednesday, at least 2,736 members of the U.S. military have died since the beginning of the Iraq War in March 2003, according to an Associated Press count. The figure includes seven military civilians. At least 2,174 died as a result of hostile action, according to the military’s numbers.

The number of planted bombs is "at an all-time high," said Maj. Gen. William Caldwell, a military spokesman, as the attackers defy U.S. efforts to staunch the vicious sectarian bloodshed in Baghdad that threatens to plunge the country into civil war.

U.S. military officials said the surge in violence could be partly attributed to the increased exposure of American forces as they patrol the dangerous streets of Baghdad to try to quell reprisal killings between Shiites and Sunnis.

The disclosure of heavy American losses came on another day of horrific violence for Iraqis, with at least 59 people killed across the country, police said. The single deadliest attack was in Ramadi, a Sunni insurgent stronghold in western Iraq, where a suicide bomber exploded his car at an Iraqi army base, killing at least 19 people, according to a police official.

18 Responses to Taliban back in control in Afghanistan; Iraq death toll mounts

  1. South Point Man

    October 7, 2006 at 6:40 pm

    And to think that we were even there to begin with because a certain three buildings in a certain city on the east coast fell under very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very suspicious circumstances. Why, some people have said these buildings were brought down in controlled demolition and that the whole affair was an inside job…

    Ha ha, what kooks, eh?

  2. Sandy Price

    October 7, 2006 at 6:54 pm

    One question…..What do we do if North Korea starts in again in South Korea, or sends a bomb there or here in the USA?

    Anyone know what we do then?

    Oh wait, we first have to go after Foley and all the gays in America……

  3. Steve C

    October 8, 2006 at 1:00 am

    Oh no, that can’t be right. According to Ann Coulter, Afganistan is going “swimmingly.” Maybe she meant swimming in blood and opium.

  4. roscoe

    October 8, 2006 at 1:29 pm

    “Mission Accomplished”.

    This is all part of the fantasy world the modern GOPer now inhabits…it’s all make believe on TV.

  5. Sandy Price

    October 8, 2006 at 2:07 pm

    I still feel this Foley mess is a diversion for something far more serious. Will we send a bomb to Tehran? North Korea? Is there something really dirty coming out about President Bush himself?

    The Foley story is typical of the new Republican movement of hiding behind some effort to prove that America is a Christian nation therefore infallible. Why should it be a shock that men like Hastert and Bush would try to hide what happened? What are they really hiding? Something smells very bad in the White House this month…..

    Has Bush signed a surrender in Baghdad without us knowing it? Has he been caught with his pants down with an intern or media man?

    We must be prepared for a real October shock. They have weeks to sell their GOP party and what will they pull out of the hat?

  6. doug g

    October 8, 2006 at 6:54 pm

    Taliban gone forever

    Direct quote from Bush —- For Immediate Release — Office of the Press Secretary — November 24, 2003 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/11/20031124-6.html — ”Working with a fine coalition, our military went to Afghanistan, destroyed the training camps of al Qaeda, and put the Taliban out of business forever.” (Applause.)

  7. Nick

    October 9, 2006 at 4:22 pm

    October shock?
    They are programming machines now to declare
    a win in november elections.
    And than if You scream,
    they declare You a terrorist
    and send You to detention
    center forever.
    This is You shock.

  8. TallMike2

    October 9, 2006 at 5:12 pm

    It’s time for the people to take back their power and vote the SOBs out of power. Get out and vote! Something like less than half of the eligible voters actually get out and vote in any given election. If you haven’t voted, don’t dare complain! GET OUT AND VOTE! And, please, by all means, write to your congressman and senators and tell them what you want. They are supposed to represent you and not sell themselves like prostitutes to the highest bidders. Here in Pennsylvania we are working hard to get rid of Santorum (another lying hypocrite). Get involved in your local elections. Make the government responsible to the voters. Take back your power.

  9. Colleen

    October 9, 2006 at 7:49 pm

    ummm we tried to take back our power in the last election…diebold decided our leaders…the people lost…it’s going to be the same again in this election…it’s already predetermined whose going to win and if there is any question about shady voting and who won, we have the chimp’s nominated Supreme Court to decide for us… As for the Foley scandal, I have to agree with Sandy, it’s a diversion being used to hide something much bigger like maybe troop buildup along the Iraq, Iran border and naval buildup in the gulf…..watch what happens after the elections…it’s not going to be purdy!

  10. South Point Man

    October 7, 2006 at 6:40 pm

  11. Sandy Price

    October 7, 2006 at 6:54 pm

  12. Steve C

    October 8, 2006 at 1:00 am

  13. roscoe

    October 8, 2006 at 1:29 pm

  14. Sandy Price

    October 8, 2006 at 2:07 pm

  15. doug g

    October 8, 2006 at 6:54 pm

  16. Nick

    October 9, 2006 at 4:22 pm

  17. TallMike2

    October 9, 2006 at 5:12 pm

  18. Colleen

    October 9, 2006 at 7:49 pm