<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whispers doomed Edwards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/10163/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/10163</link>
	<description>The oldest political news site on the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kibitzer</title>
		<link>http://www.capitolhillblue.com/node/10163/comment-page-1#comment-37664</link>
		<dc:creator>Kibitzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-37664</guid>
		<description>...and whispers will doom Obama unless his camp faces squarely the charge on  internet videos (2; the second, a press conference in the Nat&#039;l Press Club, an impressive performance) that he had sex with a man whom he also shared drugs with, well beyond his high school days (in 1999, I believe is the charge; when he was still in the Illinois legislature).  Especially with the Rovian influence in the McCain camp, this elephant in the room will be played cleverly, and to the Repub&#039;s best advantage; most probably after the Democratic convention, when the Demos will then be saddled with a fatally crippled candidate, if the charge is true, and in any event the whispers will drip, drip, drip all the way to November.
Not that Hillary doesn&#039;t have skeletons in her own closet.  But a lot of that can be written off as yesterday&#039;s news.  In any event: this election is looking to get down and dirty, and the more Obama faces the public, and dispels concerns, the better.  Look at his handling of the fiery preacher issue; it gave him a great opportunity for a very fine speech.  But speeches alone aren&#039;t going to win this one for him.  He needs to instill a sense of trust in him.  Ask Edwards which approach to personal peccadillos  is better.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and whispers will doom Obama unless his camp faces squarely the charge on  internet videos (2; the second, a press conference in the Nat&#8217;l Press Club, an impressive performance) that he had sex with a man whom he also shared drugs with, well beyond his high school days (in 1999, I believe is the charge; when he was still in the Illinois legislature).  Especially with the Rovian influence in the McCain camp, this elephant in the room will be played cleverly, and to the Repub&#8217;s best advantage; most probably after the Democratic convention, when the Demos will then be saddled with a fatally crippled candidate, if the charge is true, and in any event the whispers will drip, drip, drip all the way to November.<br />
Not that Hillary doesn&#8217;t have skeletons in her own closet.  But a lot of that can be written off as yesterday&#8217;s news.  In any event: this election is looking to get down and dirty, and the more Obama faces the public, and dispels concerns, the better.  Look at his handling of the fiery preacher issue; it gave him a great opportunity for a very fine speech.  But speeches alone aren&#8217;t going to win this one for him.  He needs to instill a sense of trust in him.  Ask Edwards which approach to personal peccadillos  is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

