Home

Google

Web Capitol Hill Blue

 
May 16, 2008 - 7:03am.

After losing three straight Congressional elections in districts that used to be solid Republican, the Grand Old Party is in chaos, fretting and worrying about its rapidly dimming prospects not only in the upcoming Presidential election but also in the House and Senate races.

Good. Republicans are finally getting what they have deserved for so long. We can only hope that the punishment is long, torturous and painful.

The fall of the Republican Party is long overdue. No group in this nation has done as much to destroy the foundations that once defined this country. No Islam-spouting terrorist has done as much damage to the Constitution, to our freedoms, to our heritage and to our future.

America’s long-painful march into oblivion started with the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980, a sad time that gave power to the rabid religious right and empowered the knee-jerk conservatives determined to drag this nation back into a Victorian stupor.

Reagan embraced Bible-thumping demagogues like Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell – fundamentalists who twisted the words of the Bible and preached far more hate than a dozen Jeremiah Wrights.

When Republicans seized control of Congress in 1994, they saw the election not as a repudiation of Bill Clinton’s extremism – which it was – but as a mandate to impose their archaic views upon the world.

Then we got George W. Bush, the most corrupt, the most venal, the most anti-American President in the history of the United States. Bush and his right-wing cabal set about to finish what their partners-in-crime had started – the dismantling of the Constitution and the conversion of a Democratic Republic into a dictator-like fascist state.

Under Bush, America became an aggressor nation, invading a country that posed no threat to our freedoms and turning that country into a civil-war torn nightmare where more than 4,000 Americans have died along with hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians.

He stripped this nation of its dignity, turning it into a police state where freedom no longer exists and the Bill of Rights serves as toilet paper in the Oval Office bathroom.

Bush and his GOP cohorts destroyed a once-robust economy, turning the American middle-class into a homeless, foreclosed class while his fat cat friends profited from an illegal and immoral war.

And when the Republicans had a chance to embrace change, they turned instead to John McCain, an aging GOP chameleon who has trouble remembering his own name but is determined to keep America at war and the nation’s freedoms under siege.

Tom Davis, a Northern Virginia GOP Congressman and former head of the National Republican Congressional Committee, offers this analysis of the party’s prospects this November:

The political atmosphere facing House Republicans this November is the worst since Watergate and is far more toxic than the fall of 2006, when we lost 30 seats (and our majority) and came within a couple of percentage points of losing another 15 seats.

Call it a well-deserved case of good, old-fashioned karma comin’ round.

Of course, this is May and the election is still six months away. A lot can happen in 180 days. But most polls say the nation as a whole is sick and tired of the Grand Old Party.

Is Armageddon comes to Republicans, it couldn’t happen to a more deserving bunch of crooks, shysters, con-artists and thieves.

(Updated on May 19, 2008 to reflect a change in the headline)

»

And we will finally be done

And we will finally be done with the Bushes! Hallelujah!

»

Doug, Peggy Noonan,

Doug,

Peggy Noonan, commenting in today's Wall Street Journal, seems to think as you (and many of the rest of us) do that the Republicans are now stuck with a "ruined brand", to wit:

What happens to the Republicans in 2008 will likely be dictated by what didn't happen in 2005, and '06, and '07. The moment when the party could have broken, on principle, with the administration – over the thinking behind and the carrying out of the war, over immigration, spending and the size of government – has passed. What two years ago would have been honorable and wise will now look craven. They're stuck.

Mr. Bush has squandered the hard-built paternity of 40 years. But so has the party, and so have its leaders. If they had pushed away for serious reasons, they could have separated the party's fortunes from the president's. This would have left a painfully broken party, but they wouldn't be left with a ruined "brand," as they all say, speaking the language of marketing. And they speak that language because they are marketers, not thinkers. Not serious about policy. Not serious about ideas. And not serious about leadership, only followership.

Her entire article (entitled the "Pity Party") can be found HERE .

Coming from the Wall Street Journal, this is powerful stuff, and indicative of the huge "hole" the Republicans have now dug themselves into. It's well worth the read.

»

The one thing I have learned

The one thing I have learned in the past 8 years is:

NEVER UNDERESTIMATE HOW FAR KARL ROVE WILL GO TO WIN!

And Karl Rove is ADVISING John McCain Behind the scenes!

However, the Republican party is starting to wise up.

I read yesterday there might be a shakeup of the Party Congressional leadership. It's about time!

The newbies are afraid they will lose their jobs because the oldsters like Boerhner and others will not let them vote with the Democrats.

People are being threatened with losing all their "perks" if they crossover and vote with the Dems and some people are tired (and scared rightly so) because of it.

Even John McCain changed his 100 year strategy to a 4 year strategy because when they polled the public, that 100 year statement was really causing him problems.

Maybe in the next few months, we will see an attempt at more bipartisanship because many GOP who are seriously afraid at losing their jobs are ready to make what GW and his supporters irrellevant for the first time in 8 years.

But again, please remember that Karl Rove is ADVISING John McCain's campaign. We must take that VERY SERIOUSLY.

»

I worked for the GOP since I

I worked for the GOP since I was able to vote at 21 and never missed even a local election trying to put Republicans into office. The more elections I lost, the harder I worked. Reagan's second term was the beginning of the end of the GOP for just the reasons Doug has mentioned.

The GOP wants nothing more than a religious Empire trying to change the core of our individual freedoms. This desire for looking to God for their decisions has caused a corruption not seen in America since we split from England.

The constant force of trying to make Americans feel that the government is the source of good and we all must follow the GOP for our own good, is nothing but a terrorist agenda. This is the same crap that Islam uses with their followers.

Bush has used our American soldiers as suicide bombers and killers and the American people are too stupid to see it. It is the main reason I will never again vote for any Republican until the party is crushed.

»

This is the same crap that

This is the same crap that Islam uses with their followers. "

Thanks Sandra for pointing that out. Better description still............

SAME CRAP THE TERRORISTS USE with their followers!

The Republican Party is NO BETTER than al Qaeda!

Perhaps it is just a matter of the world's perception as to who the REAL TERRORISTS are!

»

"The GOP wants nothing more

"The GOP wants nothing more than a religious Empire trying to change the core of our individual freedoms."

They at least pander to the 'evangelicals'. I have read that more than 100 million in this country are fundamentalist Christians, which includes evangelicals. I'm sure a good number of them are members of the GOP.

I wouldn't put all of our problems at the feet of those who genuinely would like to install a theocracy here, but I do agree they are a dangerous element -- the politicians that is, not fundamentalists as a whole, because I can ignore them. I can't ignore representatives and senators and their 'faith based' efforts.

I do hope the republican party implodes.

Having said all of that, look into Clinton's religious background. You couldn't call her anything less than a fundamentalist.

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080331/ehrenreich

I'm surprised this has not gotten wider distribution and garnered at least some awareness. The press loves to jump on stuff like this so, in my opinion, the MSM is ignoring it under orders from their corporate overlords. Don't forget, Ms. Hillary is in the pocket of Big Pharma and other Big Money interests. You can find your own links to verify those opinions of mine if you want confirmation.

-- Kent Shaw

»

Conservatism = mental

Conservatism = mental disorder

Conservatism is a mental disorder characterized by unfounded fear, greed, anti-social behavior, and the feeling of entitlement. Some conservatives cover their behavior with a thin veneer of apparent socialization, but it doesn't take much peeling to get beneath it.

Under the veneer you'll find the following, and much more:

- the belief that America has the inherent right to dominate the rest of the world and take its resources
- the belief that its OK to drive any gas hog vehicle any way you want and then go to war for oil to fuel it
- the belief that those who are poor and starving somehow deserve it
- intolerance for all but a very narrow view of social, political and religious views
- a disconnect from reality that is so profound that it supports a 24 hour lie machine that strokes the conservative fantasy and tries to normalize it

I've been ashamed of our behavior on the planet since the mid 60s and as unbelievable as it seems, it's gotten exponentially WORSE since then. It's pretty goddam pathetic when you look back to the GOP of the Goldwater era and fondly remember that as the "good old days". Goddam pathetic.

-Wexler

»

Yep, the steal and spend

Yep, the steal and spend REpublicans haven't been the same since Tricky Dick Nixon!

»

Nice summation! -- Kent Shaw

Nice summation!

-- Kent Shaw

»

Wrong variable on the left

Wrong variable on the left side of the equation. It should read:

Neoconservatism = mental disorder

Neoconservatives, considered by many to be the philosophical evolutes of Leo Strauss, are the followers of these tenets, as embodied implicitly in the PNAC crowd's ideas.

Most sincerely,

T. J. Flapsaddle

»

Wexler,I think that you may

Wexler,I think that you may be confusing conservatives with neo-conservatives,as per your own definition. Ed

»

RichardKanePA Yes things

RichardKanePA
Yes things have gone downhill since Ronald Reagan, but there was also Richard Nixon, and before that the Joe McCarthy witch-hunts.

The last time those representing the interests of the rich lost an election was Jimmy Carter and before that Roosevelt. So it is possible, Obama might yet become President.

The disaster looming for the Republican Party is that Hispanics who vote for McCain won’t vote Republican locally, and uneducated racists will vote for a white president and not bother with Congress. I hope McCain senility and temper shows before November. But whether or not this happens Republican Representatives aren’t going to get elected unless they shrilly criticize McCain and Bush Jr.

Google RichardKanePA

»

"The last time those

"The last time those representing the interests of the rich lost an election was Jimmy Carter "

I beg to disagree with this. I think that Clinton's win over Daddy Bush was the last time those representing the interests of the rich lost an election.

Why? Because too many average Joes' were hurting economically speaking. We are at the same point today.

"Hispanics who vote for McCain won’t vote Republican locally"

Statistically speaking Hispanices are outvoted by caucasians 5 to 1.

Hispanics are outvoted by African Americans 3 to 1 although I must point out that African American Women vote in substantial numbers.

The ONLY group that Hispanics out vote are African American Men! Whether this is due to social factors, ignorance or just plain belief that their vote doesn't matter has not been proven.

However, if it is the latter, perhaps Senator Obama's candidacy will rally this part of the Democratic Base that consistently gets outvoted in all states by Bush caucasian religious conservatives 2 to 1.

This is explains why the Bushies have won in the past. The Genuises of Propaganda are very well organized when it comes to getting out their base. This has not been the case with the Dems. Senator Obama's candidacy can only help in this area.

The bottom line is whether or not people will be hurting badly enough to pay attention and get out and vote in November. History would indicate that they probably will and it will be bad news for the steal and spend Republican party. But in the meantime, we must keep the focus on the failed Republican policies of Bush/McCain and the GOP leaders in Congress that enable them.

»

RichardKanePA Pollchecker I

RichardKanePA
Pollchecker I stand by my claim that the last time representatives of the poor won one was under Carter. Reagan and before Reagan, Hoover dreamed of destroying the unions, but only under Clinton did union organizing cease. Clinton pressured welfare mothers to hire babysitters and often travel to far away suburbs to get a job, Bush Jr. is pressuring them to stay married, and take care of their kids. How dose Bill Clinton represent freedom on Bush Jr., welfare slavery?

There is a lot more. Thankfully McCain is almost senile and has a temper, unless he still makes it to the White House.

If it wasn't for Hillary's attitude toward Muslims that bin Laden longs for, I would have gone for half a loaf under Hillary.

»

Well no one would certainly

Well no one would certainly claim that Daddy Bush was EVER a champion of the POOR, that's for certain. Since Clinton at least grew up understanding what it means to become something from nothing with hard work, I still think he classifies as someone who could champion the working stiff. The changes you speak of were not the Democrats. It was those steal and spend Republicans that took over our gov't in 1994.

Remember, they wanted welfare reform...personal responsibility is what I beleive they called it. What I don't understand is why corporations don't have to take personal responsibility for their actions and desicions just like everyone else? No apparently under the failed policies of BUSH/MCCAIN have enabled basically a corporate fascist state to emerge under the guise of free enterprise.

This is truly dangerous because have the country doesn't understand what that even means.

"Thankfully McCain is almost senile and has a temper"

Yes and it's one of those...."it's not if, it's a matter of when" things.

I will enjoy watching it played over and over when it happens as well as being dissected by every MSM talking head out there on both sides (grin).

»

"Since Clinton at least grew

"Since Clinton at least grew up understanding what it means to become something from nothing with hard work, I still think he classifies as someone who could champion the working stiff."

Excellent point of which I often lose sight. Power corrupts and I guess human fallibility sets in even among those who could have been heroes like Bill Clinton. Whats it called, not hubris, but another greco/roman term? The tragic ironic something or other.

-- Kent Shaw

»

"Hoover dreamed of

"Hoover dreamed of destroying the unions, but only under Clinton did union organizing cease."

One traditional bastion of democratic support allowed to wither on the vine.

-- Kent Shaw

»

Dr. D. There is little

Dr. D. There is little difference in whether a neo-Conservative wants a World Empire or the plans of the Conservatives who want a Christian Nation.

They are all supported by the same financial base and want control over the GOP. Neither movement has any desire for a limited and honest government as both want complete control over the Supreme Court, the Congress and the White House. The only way they can continue as the GOP is if they can keep America in a state of war.

»

Concur. I think, though,

Concur. I think, though, that the financial base(s) may be cynically manipulating the fundamentalist Christians as a voting bloc in order to push their other agendas like globalization and continued militarism and interventionism.

-- Kent Shaw

»

"The only way they can

"The only way they can continue as the GOP is if they can keep America in a state of war."

Ain't that the truth!

»

Both the Repugnicants and

Both the Repugnicants and the Democraps are in a continual state of War -- with each other. Neither one can pass up an opportunity to snipe at the other one. They demonize each other the same way that the Shi-ites and Sunnis do.

They both have their agendas and neither one can think of doing what's right for the nation unless it's done their way.

A pox on all political parties.

»

"They demonize each other

"They demonize each other the same way that the Shi-ites and Sunnis do. "

That's a really good point. Can I use it sometime?

»

I'm trying to make sense of

I'm trying to make sense of what's happened in these past two terms where we seem to have entered a hostile universe under "compassionate conservativism." It is so eerie, it's as though it's from some dark or absurd commedy.

Before visiting this page, I just visited youtube, and watched a film clip from Monty Python's scene of King arthur explaining how the Lady of the Lake held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the lake thus proclaiming his right to rule, I sometimes think that the angry, soggy spirit of Mary Jo Kopechne has become the new "Lady of the Port," Kennebunkport that is. The vengeful spirit vacated Poucha Pond spanned by Dike Bridge, and seeking revenge on lying, oversexed, treacherous Democrats, settled in the Port of Kennebunk, where she acquired the supernatural power to bestow the right to rule on Republicans, whether worthy or not (though G.H.W. Bush knew of such power from his old, Masonic based Skull and Bones' days, George the Lesser, simply dismissed the passage of power as a mere whiskey and cocaine concocted fantasy.

Be that is may, and by whatever questionable means, GW does sit on the throne today, and has even said "God wanted me to be president." Instead of a sword or scepter, King George has his Dick (V.P.) from which he draws his real power and inspiration.

Perhaps I can say it best in "Erse Verse:"

BUSH AND HIS EVIL DICK

Neo-Conservatism
feeds off misfortune and schism
individual's need
can't match Abramoff's greed
We've bent over for Dick Cheneyism

Karl K. 8/16/08

»

It is beyond surreal. We

It is beyond surreal. We need to coin a new word for this essentially "post-surreal" nightmarish world. We don't yet physically feel much of the nightmare, but a lot of dark-skinned people do, starving, dying of thirst or easily preventible diseases, sudden rocket and bomb bursts, sleeping and living in raw sewage, much of it at our own hand, yes "our" because we continue to pay for it. Logically, then, we must support it. Trillions for war. Nothing for humanity. Mass psychosis on earth.

As Kurt V. said, "So it goes."

-- Kent Shaw

»

""post-surreal" nightmarish

""post-surreal" nightmarish world" = Wonderland

»

Thank you, George Orwell

Thank you, George Orwell (grin).

-- Kent Shaw

»

Likely the GOP will lose,

Likely the GOP will lose, but don't get your hopes up about substantial change for the better.

If the Democrats win by a landslide, they will be smug, thinking they have a mandate to do what they please, which would be politics as usual. After all, it will be their real constituents, corporate America, who actually brought them back in.

If they win by a slim margin, they will be just as ineffective as they have been since 2006.

And don't expect any president to give up any of the power that has already accrued to the office.

We desperately need a Gorbachev, someone who can come up through the system, yet have the integrity and strength to try to change that very system for the better, rather than reveling in its charms and blandishments.

Instead, I fear that we will see a continued slide into deep corporate fascism, more oppressive and violent than ever.

»

Comment deleted here,

Comment deleted here, expanded below.

Kent

»

Truly a solid, spot-on rant

Truly a solid, spot-on rant Doug Thompson, but it seems the Republicans are spring-loaded in the stupid position when it comes to business as usual politics.

With Bush's speech in Israel insinuating that Obama will negotiate with Hamas and John McCain's corroborating comments of the same it seems that these perennial gangsters are going to use the "fear factor" again in order to maintain their grip on the Whitehouse.

George Bush isn't out of office yet and to me he looks nuttier than the proverbial "sh*thouse rat"...!

The question is what evil will these men do between now and January 2009. Even if Obama becomes President elect it still doesn't stop Bushco from creating some nightmare that would allow them to declare martial law and to suspend the Constitution up to an including the arrest of Obama along with millions of others that they've been documenting during the past 7.5 years. The only opposing party candidate they can stomach is their fair-haired quisling sycophant; ie., Hillary. Only she or McCain are acceptable to them, she even moreso for being the next occupant in the Whitehouse.

Obama is an outsider because he's rallying "we the people" which frightens the bejesus out of them especially their corporatist sponsors who fear their obscene war profit pipeline might be interrupted.

We would all be foolish to trust the election process and assume everything is going to be OK now that George is moving towards the exit.

Carl Nemo **==

»

"We would all be foolish to

"We would all be foolish to trust the election process and assume everything is going to be OK now that George is moving towards the exit. "

A point that we should NEVER take for granted after the past 2 Presidential elections.

»

Capitol Hill Blue's columnists, blogs and reader comments

Capitol Hill Blue is an independent, non-partisan news site that belongs to no political party and subscribes to no political or philosophical point-of-view. Our columnists are welcome to their opinions but readers should understand that their views do not necessarily reflect the editorial policies of this web site. We also welcome comments to selected opinion columns and in our popular ReaderRant discussion forum. Please remember, however, that we believe in civility on this web site and comments may be reviewed, moderated or removed if we feel they contain obscenities, racism, bigotry, anti-Semitic remarks or attack other posters. Our goal is reasoned discussion on issues facing this nation and we do not feel that goal is served by personal attacks and by seeing how many cute adjectives you can attach to an elected official or politician's name.

Copyright © 2008 Capitol Hill Blue

Sign up for Capitol Hill Blue's email newsletter
Get our headlines each morning.

Email:

User login