|
Latest Stories
Recent blog posts
|
March 24, 2008 - 6:52am
Hillary Rodham Clinton has reason to be a happy camper. Over recent days, for the first time in months, she has moved significantly ahead of Barack Obama in Gallup's national polling. And, defying Milton Friedman's famous dictum that there is no such thing as a free lunch, she's made these gains at no cost. Clinton has remained quietly on the sidelines, smirking like a Cheshire cat, as Republican commentators have done all her work for her. They've dragged out the tapes of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and have helped sully what everyone thought was Obama's picture-perfect and Teflon-coated image. Why, after all, should the New York senator bear the costs of attacking Obama and his controversial pastor, further alienating black voters she so desperately wants back, when Republicans have been more than happy to do this work for her? As a result, Clinton has picked up ground and the Illinois senator has lost some. And what have Republicans gained by so enthusiastically jumping into the Democratic-primary fray? Sorry, but I don't buy the calculations about which Democrat will be easier to beat. The brilliant political tacticians have as much insight about what will be nine months from now as they had nine months ago about what we have on the table today. Sure, Wright's inflammatory sermons, and Obama's longtime association with this man, is important news. But the real story for Republicans is that, for practical considerations, there's no difference between the two left-wing, big-government-loving, morally relativist candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination. This is what Sen. John McCain of Arizona and the Republican Party should be running against, regardless of who it turns out to be. There's some sense that Obama's relationship with Wright hints at a possible hidden subversive side of his that makes him more dangerous than Clinton. But there's no reason to have concerns about one and not the other. Take, for instance, Wright's outrageous accusation that AIDS in the black community is the result of some racial conspiracy. Last summer, the Democratic presidential candidates debated at Howard University. A black journalist asked for comments about why AIDS is ravaging young black women. Clinton observed, "You know ... if HIV/AIDS were the leading cause of death of white women between the ages of 25 and 34, there would be an outraged outcry in this country." Or how about Wright's trip with the Rev. Louis Farrakhan to visit Moammar Gadhafi in Libya? So let's recall Clinton's famous embrace of and kissing Soha Arafat, wife of terrorist Yasser. Clinton wants to credit her years as first lady as relevant experience to be president. In those years, her husband, then-President Bill Clinton, transformed Arafat from terrorist to statesman, inviting him to the White House and to Camp David to negotiate peace. The fruits of this folly are pretty clear today. In a recent poll done by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research, as reported in The New York Times, 84 percent of Palestinians surveyed approved of the recent terror attack in which eight teen-age Israeli rabbinic students were murdered in a Jerusalem seminary. In my speaking tours at universities around the country, students tell me that they hear from many professors a worldview not much different from what we're hearing on the footage of Wright's sermons. Can we forget prestigious Columbia University's inviting, and providing a gracious forum for, Iran's maniac president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, to speak there (in Clinton's state of New York)? What should Republicans do? Offer low- and middle-income working Americans a real conservative alternative to "Hillbama." Appreciate one point of Obama's Philadelphia speech this week on race and religion. The Jeremiah Wrights of this world do not emerge from nowhere and do not maintain large congregations for no reason. Tens of millions of low-income Americans open themselves up to the simplemindedness of the left because they hear nothing else. They are lost because they are born and raised, often with one parent, in communities that are lost in a country that is increasingly becoming lost. Our problem is in our broken families and our broken schools. Not in the ozone layer. Let's hope that McCain will listen to the millions of conservative Christians around this country who are trying to communicate with him. They need McCain and McCain needs them. And the growing masses of struggling, working Americans need both. (Star Parker is president of CURE, Coalition on Urban Renewal and Education (www.urbancure.org), and author of three books. She can be reached at parker(at)urbancure.org.)
Capitol Hill Blue's columnists, blogs and reader comments Capitol Hill Blue is an independent, non-partisan news site that belongs to no political party and subscribes to no political or philosophical point-of-view. Our columnists and bloggers are welcome to their opinions but readers should understand that their views do not necessarily reflect the editorial policies of this web site. Any registered reader of Capitol Hill Blue can have a blog. We also welcome comments on our stories, columns or blogs and we invite you to discuss stories and other issues in our popular ReaderRant discussion forum. We believe in civility at Capitol Hill Blue and must insist that commenters avoid attacks on other readers, obscenities or threats. We reserve the right to moderate or remove comments that we feel violate our rules. Posts that contain racism, homophobia, bigotry or Antisemitism will be removed and the posters banned. Copyright © 2008 Capitol Hill Blue
|
|
Star Parker: "Hillary Rodham
Submitted by Rick Fuller on March 24, 2008 - 8:19am.Star Parker: "Hillary Rodham Clinton has reason to be a happy camper. Over recent days, for the first time in months, she has moved significantly ahead of Barack Obama in Gallup's national polling. And, defying Milton Friedman's famous dictum that there is no such thing as a free lunch, she's made these gains at no cost."
This information that Star states is wrong, wrong, wrong.
(Click link)
http://www.gallup.com/poll/105529/Gallup-Daily-Oba...
This author is a member of
Submitted by pollchecker on March 24, 2008 - 8:30am.This author is a member of yet ANOTHER steal and spend neo-con Republican organization so of course they are going to push for Hillary. (GOOD GOSH THEY ARE EVERYWHERE)(GGG)
It's perfectly clear that the GOP (Genuises of Propaganda) want to run against Hillary so they will do whatever it takes. Also, they don't read the news....they are too busy rewriting the facts into disinformational propaganda to keep up with the news.
Yes Hillary was ahead a couple of days but guess what? Senator Obama presidential actions and leadership gave him back the lead by the end of the week.
The GOP has no strategy except the strategy of fear to use against Senator Obama.
As demonstrated in the Texas primary, they clearly have the strategy of hate going for them against Senator Clinton.
Oh, Star...
Submitted by neondesert on March 24, 2008 - 11:56am.Oh, Star... Star...Star....
You had me at "morally relativist".
The right-wing has bent over backwards to accommodate those amoral lefties by legalizing torture and encroaching on personal privacy to show that while conservative morals are absolute, the right-wing can embrace ethical acclimation relative to situational adjustments when necessary. And in an attempt to be a uniter, the right-wing has given these big-government-loving America-hating liberals reason to love America by creating the country's largest bureaucracy ever. And now we have someone to continue that great wisdom in the persona of John McCain. It boggles the mind how there could be people out there who would dare to derail the straight-talk express when it promises to continue the successful path we're rolling down now.
It's difficult for me to properly relate how much I appreciate the sagacity you've shown in this column.
All the naysayers will
Submitted by Alexandria Lupu on March 24, 2008 - 2:01pm.All the naysayers will negate anything positive said about Hillary Clinton. Would that they use the same attitude when criticism is expounded against Golden Boy Obama?
Read and weep: Hillary is a
Submitted by Rick Fuller on March 24, 2008 - 3:40pm.Read and weep: Hillary is a PROVEN liar! (<--- Click here)