|
Latest Stories
Recent blog posts
|
February 7, 2008 - 12:03pm.
John McCain - Fit to Command? After the "swift boating" of John Kerry, I am very hesitant to jump on any bandwagon that wants to smear a political candidate. It offends my sense of fairness, especially after learning that the "swift boat smeared" John Kerry helped to expose atrocities committed during Viet Nam and was also instrumental in bringing the reprehensible and corrupt conduct of the U.S. Government to light in the Iran Contra affair during the 1980s. I disagreed with Senator Kerry on countless issues, but I dislike attacking him baselessly. Technically, I am a Viet Nam veteran, although as a woman serving in the U.S. Air Force, I was never within 10,000 miles of that southeast Asian hell hole. Nevertheless, I served on active duty during that period, and I did so because I believed in America and in the war. Like many other Americans, I was fooled by the Gulf of Tonkin lie. I came to know the truth eventually, but I certainly understand why my fellow patriots of that era believed in that war. Futhermore, I have no issues with anyone who spent years in a POW camp and was forced to collaborate to survive. While that might not be the best solution to an impossible situation, I am well aware that it might be the only solution. None of us who have never been in such a situation can say with certainty what we would or would not do, despite any sincere oath to follow the POW Code of Conduct. It is unwise to judge any man until you have walked a mile or two in his shoes. It does offend me, though, that any candidate would have the chutzpah to run as a "war hero," when a plethora of released U.S. documents clearly prove otherwise. I would have far more respect for Senator McCain if he would simply state that he did whatever he was forced to do in order to come home. So be it. If McCain were an honest man, we could let this collaboration issue drop. No human being is a super hero, no matter how badly we might want to believe otherwise. I do have serious political differences with Senator McCain. Senator McCain is anti-Second Amendment, for one thing, and I believe strongly in our right to keep and bear arms. McCain is also very much for the Iraq war, and he has publicly stated that it would not trouble him if we had American soldiers serving in Iraq for the next hundred years. How I personally feel about this war based on lies is well known. Nevertheless, I do still firmly believe that a candidate should run on the issues as he sees them, and so long as the election is free and fair, we should abide by the final results, however we might feel about those issues. Every American has a right to their say. For these reasons and others, my sense of personal fairness insists that I give McCain the benefit of the doubt as a human being, even while vigorously campaigning against him. I dislike bigotry of any kind. Recently, I have heard rumors of McCain references to "gooks" that troubled me. However, I have known many survivors of that ghastly war who came away with emotional baggage where their opponents were concerned. It seems to me that a POW would have worse. I dislike this, but viewed dispassionately, it is understandable. However, I have recently had the opportunity to view an utterly disgusting video that convicts Senator McCain right out of his own mouth. In the most callous and heartless scene I have ever viewed, McCain belittles and berates the head of the National Alliance of POW/MIA when she was petitioning Congress for help. He was in America at that time, and in no personal danger whatsoever, so his behavior cannot be easily explained away. This is not a potentially doctored or forged document. This is John McCain himself, and it is impossible to ignore by any standard of decency whatsoever. I describe it as cruelty incarnate. This man should not be welcome in our country, let alone in our White House. Having been a POW himself, I would expect Senator McCain to at least have some sympathy for the POW/MIA cause. Clearly he has no such sympathy in this video, and the sheer heartlessness of his behavior is literally beyond belief. Could it be, sir, that you did not wish for any more of your fellow POWs to come home at all? Could they have come home with stories they might want tell about "Songbird McCain," the POW so very famous for telling his captors anything and everything they wanted to know just to save his own skin? How much of what you told the north Vietnamese led to other captured or dead Americans, sir? How would this have damaged your future political aspirations? If you doubt that this "Songbird" nickname was real, ask a Viet Nam vet. There are a lot of us still around and kicking. Better yet, ask a former POW. If you are military yourself, or if you have a son or daughter serving in uniform these days, is this the man you want for American Commander in Chief? Should he have a security clearance high enough to clean toilets, let alone have access to the nuclear "football" at will? Should he be responsible for the return of our captured kids in Iraq? We've just experienced eight years of a President unfit for Commander in Chief. Can we survive another such 4-8 years? According to Dave Gibson, just last year:
If McCain hates his former captors so much, and has nothing to fear from returning POWs, we have to ask one question. Why? Watch the videos. Judge for yourself. Note:
Capitol Hill Blue's columnists, blogs and reader comments Capitol Hill Blue is an independent, non-partisan news site that belongs to no political party and subscribes to no political or philosophical point-of-view. Our columnists are welcome to their opinions but readers should understand that their views do not necessarily reflect the editorial policies of this web site. We also welcome comments to selected opinion columns and in our popular ReaderRant discussion forum. Please remember, however, that we believe in civility on this web site and comments may be reviewed, moderated or removed if we feel they contain obscenities, racism, bigotry, anti-Semitic remarks or attack other posters. Our goal is reasoned discussion on issues facing this nation and we do not feel that goal is served by personal attacks and by seeing how many cute adjectives you can attach to an elected official or politician's name. Copyright © 2008 Capitol Hill Blue
|
User login
|
Truly a stunning, spot-on,
Submitted by Carl Nemo on February 7, 2008 - 3:44pm.Truly a stunning, spot-on, "editorial level" piece kate9954...! :)
Too bad it isn't being posted in the New York Times or the Washington Post and other major national newspapers.
All I can add is that "mad" John McPain is a "loose cannon on deck" and if elected we'll find many more troops dispatched to the Middle East and an attack on Iran we've all feared that Bushco might have pulled off while in office; ie., if he hasn't done so already by January 09...!
He'll also be selling Congress on the idea of reinstituting the draft...! The way our Congressional "politburo" has been conducting themselves since their "win" in 2006, I feel anything "Dear Leader" wants they'll accommodate them everso eagerly.
America is surely in harms way with the Republican party at the helm of state and only less so with the Dems in control, but surely at less hazard than with John McCain as president, regardless of party affiliation...! :|
Carl Nemo **==
For years (since returning
Submitted by mike351st on February 7, 2008 - 7:15pm.For years (since returning from Vietnam in 1969) I have been puzzled by the utter, total absence of "Heroes" from that war. Ask the average American to name a "hero" (other than those who became politicians) and you'll likely get a blank stare in return. Which, I suppose, is why I am mystified by the fairly recent phenomenon, the POW "hero."
I realize that my feelings on this subject are not shared by many but, I cannot help but feel that most folks don't give the subject the slightest consideration .
How else could an entire country believe that John Mc Cain is (as Rudi Gulliani proclaimed) a "Great American Hero." I don't get it. When did being captured and locked up (no longer fighting) become "Heroic"?
Perhaps I'm mistaken but, I don't believe I've ever heard of POW "heroes" of WWI, WWII or the war in Korea. Can anyone enlighten me?
I have absolutely no doubt, whatever, of the horrible treatment suffered by the POW's held in North Vietnam. However, I think it's safe to say that POW's of WWI, WWII and , certainly, Korea suffered as much. But, I don't remember anyone claiming to be a hero...much less being PROCLAIMED a hero because they survived.
The more I've thought about this issue, the more I've come to believe that there is something VERY dishonest going on here.
No one in their right mind believes that torture doesn't work. Certainly there are other, far more sophisticated techniques, that are more effective...given TIME.
But, the absurd notion that torture doesn't work is completely undermined by the FACT that virtually every US POW held in Vietnam gave in to torture and made anti-war statements. I include the "Great American Hero" from Arizona, John Mc Cain, in that group.
Not only is John Mc Cain a blatant liar, he betrayed the military brotherhood
with his despicable performance while serving on the Committee for POW/MIA's. He was the prime motivating force behind the decision to classify all POW debriefing documents (specifically his own). He is No hero, that's for sure.
I have been a Republican all my life but, I will certainly vote for Hillary Clinton or Obama before I'll EVER vote for a man who betrayed is fellow servicemen as John Mc Cain did.
Richard Montgomery
Palm Bay, FL 32908
Thank you for your comments,
Submitted by kate9954 on February 16, 2008 - 3:26pm.Thank you for your comments, Richard. I'm sorry for taking so long to respond, but work has had me sewn up lately.
I agree that torture *does* work, but it doesn't do what the Bushites would have us believe it does. If the victim has something concrete to say, it will more than likely get him to say it. That's a given.
However, the problem arises where the victim doesn't have anything to say. He will manufacture anything at all to get the torture to stop.
The question is, how do you tell the difference?
Anyone tortured will confess to *something*, guilty or not. So how can you base a legal prosecution on such a "confession"?
All of the above is true, but it doesn't state my deepest reason for opposing torture in any form. Torture makes us the monsters. Always. And it looses on our society men and women who have come to like it.
----------
Freedom Scribe
McCain sold out his country
Submitted by griff on February 7, 2008 - 11:05pm.McCain sold out his country in Vietnam, and he's been trying to finish the job ever since he got back. He is a disgrace to America and the Republican Party. 'Nuff said.
A resounding, NO, KATE.
Submitted by bryan mcclellan on February 9, 2008 - 1:23am.A resounding, NO, KATE.