|
Latest Stories
Recent blog posts
|
September 7, 2007 - 8:15am.
As America waits for the long-anticipated but even longer predetermined report from Gen. David Patraeus on the situation in Iraq it becomes more and more obvious that little, if anything, will change in the war that just today cost seven more American soldiers their lives. Patraeus will claim progress in a country torn apart by a civil war we started because those were his marching orders all along. President George W. Bush will agree to a small, but meaningless, troop cut that will gain enough Republican votes to keep Congress deadlocked and stymied and Democrats who swept into office on a platform of change will wring their hands, whine about how they need more of a majority and then claim that "gee, we tried." More Americans will die in a war that never should have been launched, deeper political and philosophical divisions will divide this country even more but - in the end - nothing will really change. Bush has made it clear he wants a "sustained American presence in Iraq" and, for the most part, Bush gets what he wants from a timid Congress. The failed Democratic leadership of Congress walked away from their campaign promises to bring change and compounded their felonies by caving in to Bush and expanding his powers to wiretap and spy on Americans at will. Americans may not face any real change when the final choices come down in next year's election. The Democratic frontrunner, Hillary Clinton, voted for the war and won't commit to any real plan to bring the troops home. Republican frontrunners all support the war and the newcomer to the race - former Senator and sometimes actor Fred Thompson - is as big a hawk as Bush. Bush conned the Congress and the American people into giving him more time to prove his "surge" would work, knowing all along that even if it didn't work he could cook the books enough to claim it has. A carefully-planned propaganda campaign by the White House has caused a small, but significant, shift in public opinion towards the war fueled by just enough bogus, but plausible, claims that the surge is working. This brings enough wavering Republicans back into the fold and gives Bush the votes to stall any Congressional effort to set a timetable for withdrawal or force an end to a failed war. While giving the appearance of an administration on the ropes, the Bush White House has outfoxed Congress at just about every turn, backing the lackluster Democratic leadership into a political corner where any real attempt to end the war comes off looking like abandonment of our troops in the field. Bush is the unabashed godfather of a political conspiracy to force an unneeded war on a gullible public but Democrats and Republicans in Congress remain his co-conspirators, complicit by giving the authority to wage a war based on lies and hidden agendas and then failing to stop him when those deceits became a matter of record. So nothing will change. Soon, the American death toll in Iraq will top 4,000. Then 5,000. In the future, when the need comes to build a monument on Washington's mall to honor those who gave their lives in another failed war, the names on a wall dedicated to the Iraq debacle may outnumber the more than 58,000 names on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial.
Capitol Hill Blue's columnists, blogs and reader comments Capitol Hill Blue is an independent, non-partisan news site that belongs to no political party and subscribes to no political or philosophical point-of-view. Our columnists are welcome to their opinions but readers should understand that their views do not necessarily reflect the editorial policies of this web site. We also welcome comments to selected opinion columns and in our popular ReaderRant discussion forum. Please remember, however, that we believe in civility on this web site and comments may be reviewed, moderated or removed if we feel they contain obscenities, racism, bigotry, anti-Semitic remarks or attack other posters. Our goal is reasoned discussion on issues facing this nation and we do not feel that goal is served by personal attacks and by seeing how many cute adjectives you can attach to an elected official or politician's name. Copyright © 2008 Capitol Hill Blue
|
User login
|
You have it so right Doug.
Submitted by Electric Bill on September 7, 2007 - 9:08am.You have it so right Doug. Nothing will change. The republicans will continue to march lockstep with the chimp and the democrats will cow and roll over like good dogs. The country will continue to rot and the new season of "Survivor" will distract the masses. Bread and circuses. At least we have the new Oktoberfest beers coming out.
The new season of Survivor
Submitted by ekaton on September 7, 2007 - 11:46am.The new season of Survivor is starting?!?!?!?
Kent Shaw
If only the American people
Submitted by Caine on September 7, 2007 - 9:13am.If only the American people would open their eyes and see what this administration has done and continues to do to this country! If only!!!
But, maybe the majority really doesn't care at all.
:sad:
The people have opened their
Submitted by rjf7r on September 7, 2007 - 3:10pm.The people have opened their eyes and voted for change -- but the system is broken, it doesn't work, "our" government is protected from the will of the electorate!
It may not be clear what the next step is, but it isn't "vote the bums out". That has been tried. Policy seems to be independent of personality.
Bob
Very well written, Doug, but
Submitted by Steve Horn on September 7, 2007 - 10:37am.Very well written, Doug, but you mentioned "Democratic leadership" - and I have to ask you, WHAT Democratic leadership?
The Democrats we voted into office to end this war don't have the courage or conviction to stand up to Bush, that's well proven.
True leaders would not give in to someone who holds the very basis of our nation, the constitution, in such disregard.
I don't see any Democratic leadership in congress, I see greedy powermongers who need to be replaced, some are Republicans, some are Democrats, all are useless and ineffecitve.
You don't counter a megalomaniac with empty words and bursts of hot air, you need to take positive action, and I've yet to see any come from the supposed Democratic leadership.
Now - how do we wake up this sleeping nation of ours?
Peace
Steve
Democratic leadership is
Submitted by ekaton on September 7, 2007 - 11:49am.Democratic leadership is just one more oxymoron. Actually they represent their constituency quite effectively, that being their corporate masters and their lobbyists.
-- Kent Shaw
Now - how do we wake up this
Submitted by old_curmudgeon on September 7, 2007 - 2:01pm.Now - how do we wake up this sleeping nation of ours?
Sorry Charlie...you don't. The concept of a "free" American ended when the Federal Reserve was created. Wilson admitted it afterward. Too late. The "Grand Experiment" has been derailed and where this train is now going is toward world domination - or is that demolition. Same difference I think. There is only one political party - the Repugs and Demoslugs are both the same as has been stated elsewhere under this post. It's been that way for about 40 years. When is the last time "our" government really listened to us? I'm over 50 and can't recall a single time when the "collective voice" actually made a difference. As for Iraq, the "occupation" of the ME is part of the grand plan. Read "The Grand Chessboard" - it's all there. The players have made no effort to hide their plans because they knew/know that the American psyche can't handle the truth. We make up excuses to avoid looking at what is really happening. It's the way we've been trained. Do I sound defeated? Perhaps. Perhaps not. Imagine how you'd feel to wake up one morning faced with a red pill reality that it's all been a lie - that there is no American Dream to capture. When you start putting all the pieces together you get a storyboard that presents a very scary scenario. I'm still trying to decide whether even the truth is a lie or not and that I might yet wake up and life will be right. I'm not a betting man. Bottom line is that it really doesn't matter what we think as "we" are not players. They will do to us as they think best. There are too few of us to matter and the power they hold over us is too great. Look at what they've done to the Constitution and BOR. They've made it legal for the government to do anything they want to us and we will have no recourse. It's now their word against our word. Guess what? Someone mentioned Ron Paul. Great man. Really. But he is only one. Too little, too bad.
It would take a vast, physical uprising to challenge the power elite. I just don't see that happening. Too many people would not want to miss American Idol or Oprah. They might actually have to sacrifice. Yeah, Right. Good Luck.
Does anyone here NOT know
Submitted by Donnat on September 7, 2007 - 11:07am.Does anyone here NOT know what this report is going to say? I could make it up myself. This administration has no credibility.
Donnat
The mistake is in assuming
Submitted by Soldat on September 7, 2007 - 11:19am.The mistake is in assuming we have two political parties - we don't.
What we have are two organizations which receive their marching orders from the same group of ne'er do wells.
Sure - they pretend there's a difference, and are in opposition to each other, but they are just empty words which the states propaganda organ amplifies and disseminates to the people.
Both "parties" and the majority of the MSM are bought and paid for stooges of the Council on Foreign Relations, check their membership rolls, follow the money and you will find it to be true.
They are the true enemy of our Republic, and far more dangerous than any group of 13th century goat herders could ever hope to be.
There are good reasons to be
Submitted by mary cali on September 7, 2007 - 5:23pm.There are good reasons to be pessimistic about a real change of policy in Iraq that redeploys the troops. However, there are other factors that might produce serious change. One is the "broken" military that both sides agree is a limitation to staying the course indefinitely. A draft during an unpolular war is unlikely.
Then there is the matter of money. The American people know that billions have been spent, but they don't know how many billions have been wasted. Congress will be holding hearings about the corruption and misuse of funds. Corruption as a way of doing business in the Mid East is not known to the general public. Perhaps the waste of tax dollars will get the public's and therefore Congress's attention where the deaths and dismemberments of volunteer soldiers has not.
Sadly Doug, you forgot to
Submitted by Doreen on September 8, 2007 - 2:32am.Sadly Doug, you forgot to mention the 1 million estimated dead Iraqis, 4 million displaced, and those too poor to escape to one of the many ill-equipped refugee camps in surrounding countries. Those without means to flee are then left to live in a depleted uranium toxic wasteland, with minimal electricity at best, no potable water, inadequate or none existent medicine, no schools, no hospitals, just a monumental humanitarian disaster/nightmare, everyday!!! But then you are right in line with the MSM in failing to mention the Iraqi plight when mentioning the US’s ongoing losses. Iraqi losses far outweigh those here at home and very rarely get the necessary attention. Maybe if "Freedom’s Watch" commercials were to show the real humanitarian crisis in Iraq instead of their pro-war propaganda, Americans, I believe would hold more contempt for war, (aka know as 21st century democracy) and its ugly consequences. Let’s see, I think I see a pattern here too. (A great read is John Perkins-Confessions of an Economic Hitman or see John Pilgers: War on Democracy) Here's the link:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18...
These are truly some of the worst of times in America, or, well, maybe they have always been bad. Let us remember the peoples who occupied these lands when we arrived and the democracy we showed them. Some things in human nature just never change. We want what we want and we take what we want when we want it.
The world watches in shock and horror at this ongoing debacle and wonders is there still life in the USA. How does someone like Bush become President is what I keep asking myself. And then to remain in office after all the truths/lies have been spoken and exposed. Someone who has brought planet earth, in 7 years, so close to the brink of self destruction. The hatred, division, loss of compassion, and intolerance seems unyielding. We are at a crossroads and the world knows this but still to many in the US deny/ignore these times.
We need millions in Washington on Sept. 15. Enough is enough. If we don’t unite and stand up to this traitorous administration and demand they be removed from office and held accountable for the crimes they’ve committed, here and in Iraq, as well as restore the rule of law to our country, I fear we are doomed to some very dark times.
As your headline states: “In the end, nothing will change,” I only hope proves to be untrue. We still may have a chance to stop this madness, and perhaps change this self destructive imperical path we seem hell bent on following.
Doreen
I have a very unique
Submitted by SEAL on September 8, 2007 - 3:41am.I have a very unique relationship with my children. I have raised two separarte generations. 3 are in their mid 30's, now. They are generation X, the dropouts who just don't give a shit. They go along with the flow and do their damndest to figure some way around the rules. Everything is crooked, so they are too. The only crime is getting caught. At least half of them don't vote because they don't see any difference in the parties or candidates since Kennedy.
The last one is 19 and his generation is so damned angry they are just looking for an excuse to go to war with the government. A real war with guns and killing and no blinking. They feel totally betrayed by our generations and they will inherit a FUBAR that can only be fixed by throwing out the old and starting all over. But even that will not fix the global warming so there isn't much to live for anyway.
I said ny relationship with them is unique because I listen to them. I taught them everything they will need to know about survival. I educated them about the world, how my generation fucked up, and told them what to expect because of it. But, now, it is they who are educating me. They are telling me what is going to happen if this or if that, etc. One thing is crystal clear. The under 25 generation in this country is ready to take over when the time comes and they will do it by force. They are armed and dangerous. If Bush were to declare Martial Law the revolutionary war would be on. No conversation - no debate - they would just attack - the shooting and killing would just start like spontaneous combustion.
I have talked to a lot of these kids. You should do that and get them to open up to you with the truth. You will be shocked. They are dead serious and deadly mad at all of us. My reaction has been different than your's will be. I teach them about weaponry and tactics because I want them to win. However, I pray nothing happens to set them off and it does not happen.
There are a bunch of us old
Submitted by ekaton on September 8, 2007 - 5:39am.There are a bunch of us old farts who would be right there with them and in support of them if they would give us a chance before shooting us.
-- Kent Shaw
Even Osama bin Ladin is not
Submitted by Rick Fuller on September 8, 2007 - 6:58am.Even Osama bin Ladin is not pleased with the Democratic "leadership." Now that's saying something!
I think Osama votes
Submitted by ekaton on September 8, 2007 - 1:53pm.I think Osama votes Republican so of course he's not happy with the democrats. His family owns Carlyle. The Bush family owns Carlyle. The Bushes and the bin Ladens are reported to be the best of friends. Just as George Bush will never be brought to account for his war crimes, neither shall Osama bin Laden, most likely esconced somewhere in a CIA safe house equipped with a recording studio, be brought to account for his terrorist actions.
Kent Shaw
Did anyone else think that
Submitted by JoyfulC on September 8, 2007 - 5:45pm.Did anyone else think that video looked totally phony and engineered to present points for the Bush administration to respond to?
Sheesh! They couldn't be working more hand-in-hand if they tried -- are they trying? History will tell. In the present, we have only to make our own judgment calls. I've made mine.
OFF TOPIC. Doug, thanks for
Submitted by ekaton on September 8, 2007 - 1:59pm.OFF TOPIC.
Doug, thanks for the recent reminder regarding needless use of abusive or venomous language to express blame or censure or bitter deep-seated ill will in our comments. I like to leave all of that to current media darling Ann Coulter.
Best regards,
Kent Shaw
Not necessarily so Doug.
Submitted by Carl Nemo on September 8, 2007 - 9:22pm.Not necessarily so Doug. Bushco is in for a huge destabilizing "surprise" soon...! :)) Rather than provide an outline, I'll simply let it be a surprise. As Martha Stewart would say... "it's a good thing"...! ;)
Nemo **==
I fear a false flag nuking
Submitted by ekaton on September 8, 2007 - 9:39pm.I fear a false flag nuking or a 'dirty bombing' of an oil refinery in or near Houston some time between 9/14 and 9/21 (options "witching date"). I hope I am wrong and that I am nothing more than just another internet crackpot.
Kent Shaw
Year....
Submitted by wiseoldgranny on September 9, 2007 - 12:32am.Year.... Jan..Feb..Mar..Apr..May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2003...... 0----0 --65 --74--37-- 30--48--35-- 31--44--82--40
2004---- 47--20--52--135-80---42--54--66--80---64-137-72
2005....107--58--35--52--80---78--54--85--49---96--84--68
2006.....62---55--31--76--69---61--43--65--72--106-70--112
2007.....83---81--81-104-126-101-79--84--18---0---0----0
Please note:
Jan 05, was the only year that we lost more troops than this year in Jan.
April 04, was the only year that we lost more troops than this year in April.
August 05, we lost one more than last year in August.
All the rest of the months in all of the rest of the years we have lost more this year.
Please tell me how this is working????
My anger is directed at the
Submitted by Citroyen on September 9, 2007 - 9:12pm.My anger is directed at the democrats right now - and that includes the pretenders to the democratic nomination. Kucinich - clear.
But Clinton and to an even greater extent Obama have the eyes and ears of the people right now and they aren't saying much. I should modify this because I have read that Clinton may be about to say something - but as of this moment the Clinton and Obama exit strategies are non-existant. What they have said is indistinquishable from what Bush is saying.
Doug - you wrote: "The
Submitted by Citroyen on September 9, 2007 - 9:41pm.Doug - you wrote:
"The Democratic frontrunner, Hillary Clinton, voted for the war and won't commit to any real plan to bring the troops home."
This is correct.
But once again "frontrunner" Obama escapes criticism for the same behavior.
As you know, Obama wasn't in the Senate at the time of the vote.
Based on his actions since becoming a Senator I have no reason to believe he would not have voted for it as well.
This is what Obama has said about ending the war in Iraq:
“[H]aving visited Iraq, I’m also acutely aware that a precipitous withdrawal of our troops, driven by Congressional edict rather than the realities on the ground, will not undo the mistakes ... It could compound them. It could compound them by plunging Iraq into an even deeper and, perhaps, irreparable crisis.”
How this differs from Bush escapes me. Obama is saying exactly what Bush said to the VFW a few weeks ago.
Personally, I think it is dangerous for us to let Obama get away with it.