Home

Google

Web Capitol Hill Blue

 
October 13, 2008 - 12:55am.

In my earlier post calling Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn heroes, not villainous terrorists, I suggested that we walked away from a real chance to change society.

One of the more thoughtful responses disagreed with me:

"We didn't walk away from it, Mike, we were broken. Kent State scared the crap out of ME. And people had kids, and wound up middle class after all, and some died from drugs, and the War on them, and some went to jail. We were intimidated."

They do that.

They also make it very attractive to join the mainstream instead of protesting it. I can tell you it's a lot more fun to live in an $800,000 house than it is to sleep on a lumpy mattress in a roach-infested apartment in a bad neighborhood.

It's a lot more fun to drive a Mercedes or a Beemer than it is to stick a thumb out and hitchhike, and it's definitely better to drink expensive wine than it is to drink stuff that comes $1 a gallon.

Things even got better for a while. The percentage of folks below the poverty line dropped under LBJ and yes, even under Tricky Dick. But Reaganomics and the horror that is Dubya have left the rich as well off as they've ever been and the rest of us, well, we're sort of fucked.

But hey, we can watch "Idol" on big-screen, high-definition TV. And we can laugh at the idiots on "Springer," until we remember that the mouth-breathing guy from the trailer park whose wife was doing his brother gets to vote just like we do.

We're sort of at a crossroads right now. We can keep tolerating the way things have been going, in which case we've got 20 or 30 years before America starts looking like one of those Schwarzenegger movies where everybody lives in cubicle apartments and corporations run everything.

Or we can start fighting back.

We can start throwing out the Republicans -- and the Democrats -- who support corporate rights over human rights.

It'll probably get bloody at some point.

But maybe we can get America back.

Technorati Tags:
»

Nice sentiments, but

Nice sentiments, but Washington would be a virtual ghost town if we removed everyone beholden to the corporations; it's woven into the very fabric of our government at this point.

The problem is that we are foolishly convinced that trading one party for another represents some form of change. The tyranny comes from the two-party system. It's where ideas go to die. It's where freedom goes to die.

It is human nature to want to be part of a group - the majority of thought - the consensus. We are taught at a young age that there's safety in numbers - to think or act on your own is a perilous path to take. Conform or be ostracised.

"Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day. But a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period, and pursued unalterably through every change of ministers, too plainly proves a deliberate systematic plan of reducing us to slavery."
- Thomas Jefferson

»

I think that they walked

I think that they walked away. They realized that there was a deadly price to be paid for the romantic idea of "revolution", a price they were not prepared to pay.

As Dr. Johnson said about the notion of being hanged in the morning had a wonderful way of focusing the mind, the idea of actually being a casualty for the cause had a way of bringing into focus their own vulnerability, their own mortality.

Most sincerely,

T. J. Flapsaddle

»

Well Flappy, since you are

Well Flappy, since you are referring to Us as "They", you don't know.

»

Grammatically, I have to

Grammatically, I have to refer to either you - second person plural - or they - third person plural; I do not know they author's actions well enough to say you - second person singular - and mean him. Nor would I presume to speak other than speculatively - based on experience - for that group.

My experience in dealing with a couple of protest actions that directly affected me suggested very, very strongly that [you | they] did not like the potential personal cost associated with a "revolution" and opted for an alternative.

Most sincerely,

T. J. Flapsaddle

»

Mike we're ALL avoiding that

Mike we're ALL avoiding that sort of confrontation, and I guess voting in Obama is our last ditch effort to keep us a "nation of laws". All the schucks running things need to do is screw up this election, and they will indeed, have a fight on their hands. I ran away when the head of the CIA became vice president to Ronald Movie Star First Tool Reagan, and lived in the Caribbean for twenty years. I sold stuff made out of palm to tourists and raised my kids in "paradise". I talked to people from all over the world, and they often asked me: "What's the best thing about being an American?" I would always reply,"Whether it's actually true or not, we grew up BELIEVING, we were Free". And that makes all the difference in the world. That's why we see America finally pushing back as one. The confusion and fear and oppression and lies that have been the last eight years, has finally been overwhelmed by that true human instinct, or as the Constitution puts it, that inalienable right. We ARE mad as hell and we're NOT going to take it anymore.As Nader said in 2000, "Things have to get worse, before they get better". Well, this is bad enough. Now it's time to make it better.

»

In order to have a

In order to have a revolution you (we) must come up with an end game. I too remember the civil rights marches and Kent State and even Berkeley at that time. Many of us waiting for "the plan" and how we (you) would plan to change the actions of our government who kept taking us to war without even a simple plan to win it.

Yes, we believed we were free and we grew up realizing the government did not allow us to be free. We could never be free as long as we tresspassed, littered, damaged other people's property, i.e., showed no respect for the freedom or property of others.

I attended meetings with many of protestors and found no plan for the future. I even ran into Jane Fonda and her husband who treated many of us like idiots. They never offered a single freedom. It was demonstrating against the system and I never remember the word peace verbally said, just written on other's property.

I keep hoping that the group here will come up with a plan to return our freedoms to all Americans. Had we bothered to learn the science of economics, we could have shown others, by example, of how to survive the meltdown of bad mortgages.

Reacting to stupidity is never a forward action. I read a call for something better and many are heading to Obama for a better government. Is this the end game? Is this the program for freedoms?

Malcolm

»

Capitol Hill Blue's columnists, blogs and reader comments

Capitol Hill Blue is an independent, non-partisan news site that belongs to no political party and subscribes to no political or philosophical point-of-view. Our columnists are welcome to their opinions but readers should understand that their views do not necessarily reflect the editorial policies of this web site. We also welcome comments to selected opinion columns and in our popular ReaderRant discussion forum. Please remember, however, that we believe in civility on this web site and comments may be reviewed, moderated or removed if we feel they contain obscenities, racism, bigotry, anti-Semitic remarks or attack other posters. Our goal is reasoned discussion on issues facing this nation and we do not feel that goal is served by personal attacks and by seeing how many cute adjectives you can attach to an elected official or politician's name.

Copyright © 2008 Capitol Hill Blue

Sign up for Capitol Hill Blue's email newsletter
Get our headlines each morning.

Email:

Syndicate

Syndicate content

User login