In the aftermath and varying opinions of the overhyped debate between the Democratic and Republican candidates for vice presidents, two areas of consensus appear to emege: Sarah Palin didn't do anything TOO stupid and voters, the ones who still make the decisions on election day, feel Joe Biden won the night.
Incredibly, Palin held her own by not debating: She announced straight out that she would not answer the questions but would stick to talking points. It was, perhaps, the only way she could stay out of trouble but it showcased an inexperienced, inept candidate who has trouble with facts and only a faint relationship with specifics.
She winked. She nodded. She grinned. She said "betcha." But she didn't debate.
In a format where clear winners are impossible unless one side or the others screws up big time or one side of the other scores a "knockout," neither Palin nor Biden emerged as the clear winner. Still, Palin did nothing to stem the doubts that remain about her ability to be a heartbeat away from the Presidency.
Writes Democratic political activist Bob Shrum:
Sarah Palin has experience being a runner-up -- which will come in handy in November. Tonight she barely kept up. In advance, the commenteriat almost unanimously agreed on a false measure of this debate. Judging by "expectation" meant that pundits could conceivably award a faux victory if she was half-coherent and modestly informed after a cram session in Arizona. But voters apply an absolute standard, not a low water mark of expectations: With America facing two wars and economic disaster, Americans ask if a candidate is up to the job.
By any rational assessment, Palin wasn't tonight -- and hasn't been any time she's not reading a teleprompter. President Palin-- the nuclear button, recession, the health care crisis, global warming (which she doesn't believe in, as she believes in creationism) -- well, it simply doesn't compute. A part in Fargo, yes -- that office in the West Wing, no.
The Politico's analysis:
Millions of Americans were watching Thursday night’s vice-presidential debate waiting for a demolition derby moment — another crash by GOP running mate Sarah Palin, another serving of raw material for the writers at "Saturday Night Live."
By that standard, she got out alive, though there were white-knuckle moments along the way: questions that were answered with painfully obvious talking points that betrayed scant knowledge of the issue at hand, and sometimes little relevance to the question that had been asked.
But recent days have given John McCain’s team little reason to suppose that not-that-bad is good enough. The Republican ticket’s sliding polls and narrowing electoral map gave it a different imperative in her showdown against Joe Biden. That was to alter the trajectory of the race in a way reminiscent of how Palin first enlivened Republicans—it seems long ago now—when she joined the ticket in late August.
Absent new polling, there is little reason to think she cleared that bar in St. Louis.
To the contrary, it is hard to count any objective measures by which Biden did not clearly win the encounter. She looked like she was trying to get people to take her seriously. He looked like he was running for vice president. His answers were more responsive to the questions, far more detailed and less rhetorical.
Writes Dan Balz in The Washington Post:
Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin spent much of the past two weeks on the defensive, hounded by critics over halting performances in television interviews and questioned even by conservative writers doubtful about whether she is ready to be vice president.
But the Palin who showed up for Thursday's debate against Democratic Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. was anything but defensive. In a fast-paced exchange about a range of domestic and foreign policy issues, she was the aggressive campaigner who in the first weeks of her candidacy had so energized the Republican faithful.
As a result, what was touted as a moment of truth for Palin instead turned into a lively and civil argument between the two vice presidential nominees over the policies and records of Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama. For 90 minutes, they sparred over Iraq and Afghanistan, energy and global warming, the economy and taxes, and which candidate would do more to protect the middle class.
One debate will not erase doubts that have been building about Palin's capacity to serve as vice president, but the effect of the encounter may shift the focus away from the sideshow that Palin has become and put it back on the two presidential nominees and what they would do for the country. Thursday's debate adds to the importance of the two remaining presidential debates, the first of which will be held Tuesday.
Palin produced at a moment McCain needed it most. In the past two weeks, his standing has deteriorated as the focus of national attention has shifted almost entirely to the economy. National and state polls show Obama gaining ground, and the preface to the debate Thursday was the news that McCain is pulling out of Michigan, once seen as a potential pickup.
Tom Shales of The Post was more pointed:
Sarah Palin looked as though she had prepared for her appearance at the vice presidential debate last night by studying Tina Fey's impressions of her on "Saturday Night Live." She twinkled and winked and piled on the perkiness, a "darn right" here and an "I'll betcha" there.
The challenge to Fey, who is scheduled to play the Alaska governor and Republican candidate again on the next "SNL" broadcast, will be to out-Palin Palin, to make the parody more outrageous than the original.
At the same time, Palin seemed determined to banish thoughts of her as airheaded and inexperienced; she was really debating her own public image rather than Sen. Joe Biden. She subverted the whole purpose of the exercise by merely repeating the key points of her running mate, Sen. John McCain, and ignoring questions that called for more specific answers.
A focus group for CBS and the viewer response line for CNN scored the debate for Biden and undecideds said they were leaning more towards the Obama-Biden ticket after watching the debate.
With the vice president sideshow over, the focus now switches back to the two principal candidates and their two remaining debates.
Gollleeeee....I think
Submitted by keith on October 3, 2008 - 8:03am.Gollleeeee....I think "Gomer" Palin did an absolutely SUPERB job of showing us all just what an "airhead" she is.
you betcha she was cute.
Submitted by christinel69 on October 3, 2008 - 8:06am.you betcha she was cute. But style over substance never works. As for her "lively" debate, that was more like watching a kid begging her dad to use the car. She kept to talking points and informed us all that her Maverickyness is all we need to know, for the Mccain Palin ticket- we really just need to trust them and change is something they'll think about after the elections.
I wasnt impressed- I didnt expect her to be a drooling idiot but some knowledge on the basics would have been nice. She is not ready for the presidency at all.
Its too bad Biden was so nice- he had many openings where he could have attacked her record but he stayed on message.
We went to a debate party at
Submitted by btchakir on October 3, 2008 - 8:23am.We went to a debate party at the home of our colleague from Hagerstown Community College Sean Maher. It was a younger crowd than we usually hang around with (20s to 30s - My son Bud's age group... he was with us, too) and decidedly pro-Obama. I say that so as not to artificially color my views as a 62-year-old Obama supporter who fears the loss of investment retirement income, Social Security, home values, etc.
While there was a drinking game taking place in one room... take a shot every time Palin says "Maverick"... those of us in the living room focused on the debate and whether or not the candidates were answering Gwen Ifill's questions or not (we were watching on MSNBC which, as my wife pointed out, did us the favor of keeping the original question printed at the bottom of the screen while the two candidates veered to the pre-set messages they had, especially in the case of Palin, obviously rehearsed.)
Ifill's questions and her steering of the candidates to answer them was pretty weak. I was surprised at that... she could have kept returning to the question to get them to focus answers, but she didn't. Too bad. It was one of the things that Jim Lehrer did pretty well.
Palin, to her credit, did not make the really stupid statements which she did with Katie Couric on their two days of interviews. She did not fall apart, kept her "cutie" composure, filled her comments with her "country girl" character and idiom, and certainly kept her supporters happy for the whole 90 minutes. Did she say anything that wasn't pre-screened by Steve Schmidt and cohorts? No. You knew from the first, quite loud (so it would be picked up by the mikes) handshake comment..."Can I call you Joe?"... that she was ready to put Biden off his guard from the beginning. Fortunately, he didn't fall for it.
Biden kept his cool through the evening and came off, I thought, as a completely professional government operator. His knowledge of foreign policy and the law, to his credit (they each have to be credited with their strengths) established an amount of confidence which was clear in the snap polls after the debate from CNN, CBS and other sources that handed the debate to the Democrat by a 2-1 margin.
Some observations:
- Palin still not sure what a VP does. She actually made a statement that she thought the Constitutional powers of the VP could be expanded. Biden made it clear that the VP was subordinate to the President, and his experience and talent would be at Obama's disposal. Period.
- Biden went in with an intent to focus on McCain and not on Palin and pretty much pulled it off. Palin went on the attack without factual substantiation, which Biden could easily call her on, frequently during the evening.
- Ifill's questions were awfully soft. Perhaps she was intimidated by the pre-debate complaints from the Republicans on her new book about black politicians. I don't know.
You could say about the debate that Palin came across as someone you would like to know, but Biden came across as someone you could trust to do the job.
Under The LobsterScope
RichardKanePA She was as
Submitted by RichardKanePA on October 3, 2008 - 9:34am.RichardKanePA
She was as cute and as folksy as Ronald Reagan. Except that the economy is really screwed she could spread as much hate and divisiveness as Reagan did. Even so as a female evangelist can do more harm then let's say Rush Limbaugh.
With the economy and uncertainty as bad as it is, Obaman Biden should be ahead by a landslide
I could say this all with a positive spin see,
http://capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/11465
No substance
Submitted by Pablo on October 3, 2008 - 10:15am.No substance
For those who vote on emotional appeals and folksiness (and the ability to do a good "shout out") Palin did well, but for those who want real solutions and answers, Palin avoided nearly all the issues presented. She lied repeatedly throughout the debate, presenting mccain as an agent of change. In fact, although she seems to think that nobody should bring up mccains consistent partisan repugnican record of voting against the middle and lower class, against alternative energy and for deregulation of rich corporations, mccain's record shows they are both lying. They have no plans of change and any critical thinker can see through the deceptive rhetoric. Unfortunately, most undecided voters who determine our destinies are not big on critical thinking skills; these deceptive ploys might work. It worked for bush twice. Peoples' stupidity is tried and true.
Palin claimed they would change the corruption in Washington although the party she supports has been an even bigger source of corruption and greed than the republicrats. She claimed they would make us energy independent although mccain has always voted against alternative energy. She misleadingly claimed their tax cuts (for the rich, which she never addressed), would provide jobs for working class people. Oh yeah, and mccain is going to take the lead on independence from foreign oil through alternative energies, sure right! The list of outright deceptions goes on and on. As Biden cleverly put it, "The past is prologue". Right on! The past is prologue, and although they lie over and over, mccain is basically a bush that can sing (remember "Bomb bomb bomb bomb Iran?).
When one is outright lying and deceiving (to put it nicely) the specifics and questions must be evaded at all costs. She did a fine job of not only lying through her teeth, but evading the questions and details as well.
I'm now more convinced than
Submitted by JerryG on October 3, 2008 - 11:10am.I'm now more convinced than ever that my latest bumper sticker is the most accurate description of McCain/Palin:
MCCAIN/PALIN - THE SPECIAL NEEDS TICKET
Joe Biden showed up for a
Submitted by Tinker on October 3, 2008 - 11:20am.Joe Biden showed up for a vice presidential debate last night. Sarah Palin showed up for a beauty pageant? a popularity contest? or what?
Palin didn't even stop her routine to show some empathy, or class, when Joe got choked up remebering his two little boys in critical condition after the wreck that killed their mother and sister.
I find the folksy act to be over-done and irritating. Just wind her up and watch her go.
(((((((((((((SHUDDER)))))))))))))
The ya'betcha chick AKA:
Submitted by JudyB on October 3, 2008 - 12:46pm.The ya'betcha chick AKA: "Soccer Mom" "Joe Six Pack" "Can I call ya Joe?" The Divine Ditz Ms Sarah opined:
That Cheney's worst act as Vice Pres. was shooting Harry Whittington while hunting "It’s the only thing Cheney’s done wrong that I can think of"...That a vice President should have more power...That she may not answer Ifill’s questions that she was gunna talk straight ta' the American people regardless...That she likes answering tough questions without the media filtering what people hear (I have yet to hear her answer a tough question)
I've had enough of everything Palin and am disgusted with her using the words like um for them, yuh for you, wergunnadu for we are going to do, and all the of her phoney folksy schlock. She has proven to me that she is an unqualified, ignorant,incompetent and a power hungry wannabe. ENUFF!!!
***The most honest statement made last night during the debate came from Biden when he said "Vice President Cheney has been the most dangerous vice president we've had probably in American history,"
"Democratic and Republican
Submitted by Ann on October 3, 2008 - 12:52pm."Democratic and Republican candidates for vice presidents, two areas of consensus appear to emege: Sarah Palin didn't do anything TOO stupid and voters, the ones who still make the decisions on election day, feel Joe Biden won the night."
My my how cute I watch CSpan again to not hear anyone else I like to make up my own mind. But my question is who's ticket is she running on? She agrees with democrat's more than republicans. Ain't she cute. Well cute doesn't get it.
Refusing to answer questions well I wanted to say then why did you show up. Then saying there you go again going back well duh as I recall Bush is still the president and even though she doesn't have a record in this McCain and Biden sure as heck do I wouldn't call that going back when Biden went through the votes all three of them had made glory be where did she get that.
She tried and I give her E for effort and F for not knowing she is so out place it makes you feel sorry for her but not enough to risk our country on. She scares me and OMG she needs to go back to Alaska and put this way behind her, then she can sit on her porch and watch Russia.
Ann
The only person I've ever
Submitted by John Q on October 3, 2008 - 1:05pm.The only person I've ever heard pronouncing "nuclear" as "new-cue-lar" is G. W. Bush. Palin pronounced it the same way many times during the "debate". For a while there I thought I was seeing Bush in skirt and lipsticks talking. Learn how to walk like Bush and you'll be really "presidential", my gorgeous. Can I have a hug!?
Just dress her up in a
Submitted by snargle on October 3, 2008 - 1:22pm.Just dress her up in a flight suit and whisk her off to an aircraft carrier flight deck...*POOF* Instant G.W Bush with boobs! :)
Put lipstick on a Palin and
Submitted by RSW on October 3, 2008 - 2:30pm.Put lipstick on a Palin and it's still a Palin...
Ugh!!!
Oldernwiser
McCain - Palin 2008 Thanks,
Submitted by Zman on October 3, 2008 - 1:42pm.McCain - Palin 2008
Thanks, but no thanks.
I'm still trying to
Submitted by knockknock on October 3, 2008 - 1:56pm.I'm still trying to understand why nobody is bringing up McCain's part in the Keating Five and the S&L rip off of the elderly.
Are Obama and Biden just being gentlemanly or will Obama finally bring it up in another debate?
Very disappointing to have such factual information against your opponent and not use it.
Palin did a GREAT job! She
Submitted by jgw on October 3, 2008 - 2:52pm.Palin did a GREAT job! She also proved that she was a well trained soldier doing what she was told. She stuck to her script (literally - color codes and all) and only tried to deviate one time (a mistake). I have revisited the debate and have found that almost half the time she was either reading, or studying, her notes and the rest of the time being endearing by looking directly into the camera and smiling (she did this REALLY well) whilst giving well prepared and rehearsed thoughts and/or replies.
I am sure there is a real Sarah Palin and am equally sure we didn't see her last night. I do know that without her notes she is a disaster, as her two interviews have shown. Someplace, in between the interviews and debate there must be a real person but I haven't seen that yet and am not holding my breath. Any discussion that what she was saying was, somehow, the real Sarah and her views, is, I think, simply wrong.
jgw
Port Angeles, WA
I know that sooner or later
Submitted by John Q on October 3, 2008 - 3:41pm.I know that sooner or later the question about who is the real Sarah Palin will come out. The fact is that she is a political humanoid robot created under the code name of "Sarah", taken from the character Sarah Connor of the Terminator series. The full description of the project is "Political Android Lacking Intellectual Nuance", hence the last name PALIN. The programming of PALIN is still a work-in-progress. She is released suddenly before she is fully functional due to the dire situation of the McCain campaign. A much improved version of artificial intelligence is expected to be implemented before the 2012 presidential election. I hope that answers your question.
John Q wrote: I know that
Submitted by sherry on October 3, 2008 - 7:07pm.John Q wrote: I know that sooner or later the question about who is the real Sarah Palin will come out. The fact is that she is a political humanoid robot created under the code name of "Sarah", taken from the character Sarah Connor of the Terminator series.
I have been saying the same thing about the Obamabot for weeks.
Have you seen the YouTube where his teleprompter went down? You could have a drinking contest for all the stammering and "uh". Sadly he was talking about healthcare.
He too reminds me of George Bush.
Yeah, Palin has an accent. So does Bill Clinton. So does Hillary.
What a bunch of sexist jerks you all are. She is cute. O my goodness! Perhaps she should have rented a Janet Reno costume. Would that make you feel better?
She DOES have executive experience. Yet, being a governor who has actually balanced a budget is completely dismissed. Obama was a community organizer.
Anyone know of any great accomplishments there? Crime in the southside is 80% higher than the rest of Chicago. Was it 95% higher before he put his golden touch there?
He funneled housing money to Rezko, and yet the poor and the elderly went without heat during a cold Chicago winter. Obama pleaded ignorance about what was happening in his very own district. Among the poor. Among his very constituents.
Rezko, had zero building experience when he received those grants and loan guarantees. Perhaps this is why his buildings were not up to code, fell apart and went into foreclosure. He wasn't stupid though. He made millions and left the state and federal government holding the bag. Nice guy, huh?
Did any landmark legislation happen under Obama's watch?
In the state senate? In the US Senate? O yeah, the ethics bill. So, is Washington all cleaned up now?
And BTW, Biden out right lied when he said Obama never said he would sit down with Iran with out preconditions. Not only did Obama say it, he said it was ok by Kissinger, who quickly said Obama mischaracterized his statements and expressed resentment.
Palin is not ready for POTUS. The scary part is, neither is Obama.
Kucinich and Gravel
Submitted by Pablo on October 3, 2008 - 9:16pm.Kucinich and Gravel
were the only good, sincere candidates on the democratic ticket, but the american people as a whole are lazy, fearful of change, and led by a media run by the same corporations that control our politicians through legal briber--errrr-ummm uhh I mean lobbying. They don't want anybody that will rock the boat too much, so now we must hold our noses and vote for the lesser of two evils, or third party as one last rebellious statement before the whole #&@%house goes up in smoke.
Kucinich rolls over and
Submitted by woody188 on October 6, 2008 - 9:07am.Kucinich rolls over and plays dead every chance he gets. When push comes to shove he makes sure to take care of himself and his trophy wife first. This makes him worse than many other Congress critters, because he is a pretender fooling real honest and hard-working people into following him, and then hanging them out to dry when the poo hits the fan. Don't fall for it anymore!
Being governor of a state
Submitted by acf on October 4, 2008 - 6:06pm.Being governor of a state that has a huge surplus because of huge oil company payments rooted in the high global price of oil is not a major challenge of executive budgeting. Being governor of a state with lots of acres, but less people than most moderately sized (650,000) cities in the lower 48, is again, not much of a managerial challenge. Having to hire a city manager for a town of, what...6, 8, 10 thousand, doesn't say much for the executive skills of its mayor. In fact, a town that size could even have a part time mayor, or one who is just the senior member of the town council or board of selectman. All in all, not much experience to brag about, unless you're trying to 'burnish' a thin resume.
As for Obama, as far as I know, law enforcement is the responsibility of the mayor & city council of a city, not a state legislator who represents the area, and I'm not absolutely certain, but I think community organizers don't have that responsibility, either.
Your comments about what you
Submitted by Southerner on October 6, 2008 - 7:19am.Your comments about what you claim are Obama's sins might be more credible if you cited where your information came from. Tell us where you got the info. Cite your sources. Otherwise, you're just parotting Republican talking points, and I, for one, am not going to take that seriously unless you tell me where you got the info.
You say that neither Palin nor Obama is ready to be President. I would, of course, strongly dispute that, but I know I'm not going to change your mind. But even if that were true, would you actually prefer that Palin become President instead of Obama? And given McCain's age and history of cancer, if he's elected, Palin could well be in the White House a year or two from now.
That scares me beyond anything I can describe here. And it has nothing to do with the fact that she's a woman. It has everything to do with the fact -- or at least my sincere perception -- that her philosophy of governing is based on dangerous fantasies and smug, willful ignorance. This was clearly on display at her debate with Biden. She didn't behave like a serious candidate for high political office. She behaved like a cocktail waitress schmoozing for a big tip. It seems to me that her behavior at that debate should have appalled anyone who claims to have a preference for open, competent government.
Whatever your criticisms of Obama, legitimate and otherwise, at least he's willing to respond to direct questions in a debate. The differences between how Palin and Obama would run our government seem to me striking.
Palin's formula for the
Submitted by Klaus Hergeschimmer on October 3, 2008 - 5:02pm.Palin's formula for the Debate: a Palindum
>being a governor who has
Submitted by pondering_it_all on October 3, 2008 - 10:21pm.>being a governor who has actually balanced a budget is completely dismissed
Sorry, Sherry. "Balancing the budget" of the State of Alaska is no accomplishment at all: They have so much oil company income that they don't have an income tax or even a sales tax. The "budget" calculation consists of (oil income - state expenses) / population = your yearly royalty check. Sarah Palin didn't have to negotiate with her state assembly, didn't have to choose programs that would need to be cut, didn't have to do much of anything at all except sign the spending bill her handlers put in front of her.
BTW: I really enjoyed the way she threw Bush and all the congressional Republicans under the bus during the debate! She remembered to distance herself and Senator McCain from the Bush Administration, but apparently forgot that, in the highly unlikely event they win, she would have to work with a Congress full of members she just called corrupt, wasteful, blunderers!
She also had no difficulty spouting the joys of deregulation in one breath, and than calling for stricter regulation in the next. Could it be that Sarah Palin doesn't understand the meaning of that term? Because if she does, then that just makes her a sociopath who can lie with a straight face.
What really makes me sick is
Submitted by Klaus Hergeschimmer on October 4, 2008 - 12:53am.What really makes me sick is how even pundits that that don't like her having acknowledged she is as dumb as a doornob walk on eggshells being carefull not to notice her as the Elephant in the room she is.
Dip Krap pundits stating how she skillfully avoided questions by not answering them...come on, skillfull my Pink Ass, thats bald faced arrogance! Nothing 'skilfull' about that. She has the intelligence quotient of a flea (no insult intended to fleas).
The Chimp is a Noble laureate compared to Palindum... 'SHOCK'....Never thought I'd hear myself saying that.
Sherry, Stay on CHB because
Submitted by Kibitzer on October 4, 2008 - 1:15pm.Sherry,
Stay on CHB because I like to see a variety of opinions, not just down-the-line mutual admiration society stuff. But I need to ask you: Do you REALLY think the McCain/Palin ticket is better for America than the Obama/Biden one??
Personally, I'd rather write in Ron Paul (though my state won't allow me to), and thus am not a doctrinaire liberal. But there is no way in Hades that I would ever feel that McCain and Palin are the right ticket for where the country is at, especially at this time. Life is too serious for second-drawer talent in that position of responsibility, for the nation and for the world.
Heck, the last time a good
Submitted by Billbop on October 4, 2008 - 1:23pm.Heck, the last time a good looking gal
like that winked at me that many times,
she was trying to get an extra $20 for
a lap dance.
Almost felt like I was cheating on my wife ;-)
Kibitzer, I know. The
Submitted by ekaton on October 4, 2008 - 5:50pm.Kibitzer, I know. The Republicans. I mean, Sarah Palin, you guys? Really? Really?
-- Kent Shaw