|
Latest Stories
Recent blog posts
|
September 22, 2008 - 6:20am.
Now, in what could be a historic year for a black presidential candidate, a new Associated Press-Yahoo! News poll, conducted with Stanford University, shows just how wide a gap remains between whites and blacks. It shows that a substantial portion of white Americans still harbor negative feelings toward blacks. It shows that blacks and whites disagree tremendously on how much racial prejudice exists, whose fault it is and how much influence blacks have in politics. One result is that Barack Obama's path to the presidency is steeper than it would be if he were white. Until now, social scientists have not closely examined racial sentiments on a nationwide scale at a moment when race is central to choosing the next president. The poll, which featured a large sample of Americans — more than 2,200 — and sophisticated survey techniques rarely used in media surveys, reflected the complexity, change and occasional contradictions of race relations. More whites apply positive attributes to blacks than negative ones, and blacks are even more generous in their descriptions of whites. Racial prejudice is lower among college-educated whites living outside the South. And many whites who think most blacks are somewhat lazy, violent or boastful are willing or even eager to vote for Obama over Republican John McCain, who is white. The poll, however, shows that blacks and whites see racial discrimination in starkly different terms. When asked "how much discrimination against blacks" exists, 10 percent of whites said "a lot" and 45 percent said "some." Among blacks, 57 percent said "a lot" and all but a fraction of the rest said "some." Asked how much of America's existing racial tension is created by blacks, more than one-third of white respondents said "most" or "all," and 9 percent said "not much." Only 3 percent of blacks said "most" or "all," while half said "not much at all." Nearly three-fourths of blacks said white people have too much influence in American politics. Only 12 percent of whites agreed. Almost three times as many blacks as whites said blacks have too little influence. Far more blacks than whites say government officials "usually pay less attention to a request or complaint from a black person than a white person." One in five whites have felt admiration for blacks "very" or "extremely" often. Seventy percent of blacks have felt the same about whites. The poll may surprise those who thought Obama's appeal to young voters proves Americans in their 20s and 30s are clearly less racially biased than their parents. The survey found no meaningful differences among age groups in whites' perceptions of blacks, although older whites appear more likely to discuss their views. Some findings fall into the glass half-empty or half-full category. One-fourth of white Democrats ascribed at least two negative attributes to blacks. But two-thirds of those Democrats said they will vote for Obama. That finding alone could nourish a debate about how much harm is done by racial prejudices that seem to have modest influence on how people behave. Kelly Edmondson, 34, of Cincinnati, is a white Democrat enthusiastic about backing Obama. The country needs a new direction, she said, and "I feel like he can reach a lot of people." She cares for her two sets of young twins during the day and teaches college at night; most of her students are black. In the survey, Edmondson said positive words such as "hardworking" and "intelligent" describe most blacks "very well." She said a few negative traits, such as "lazy" and "irresponsible," apply "somewhat well" to most blacks. In a telephone interview, Edmondson said those attributes apply equally to all races. She fretted that some of her fellow Ohioans might be less candid, privately planning to vote for McCain when they publicly say they are "on the fence." "I worry about that," she said. Polls consistently show Obama running about even with McCain, or leading by a notably smaller margin than the one Democrats enjoy over Republicans in most generic surveys about which party is best suited to govern. The AP-Yahoo News poll suggests that racial prejudice could cost Obama up to 6 percentage points this fall. That's a big hurdle in a nation whose last two presidential elections were decided by much smaller margins. Charles Crozier, 73, of Marietta, Ga., said he is a "quasi-independent" Democrat who is undecided on the presidential contest. He likes McCain on energy issues, including his call for more nuclear energy. But he prefers Obama's stands on economic issues. Crozier, who is white, said race is not a factor in his thinking. He said he's not sure "how much of an issue it is for (other) people" in his community. It frustrates him to hear people incorrectly state that Obama (who is Christian) is a Muslim because they read it on the Internet. "I'm old enough to know a lie repeated often enough becomes the truth," Crozier said. "You can't change their minds." Racial progress in America is undeniable on many fronts. But millions of white and black Americans still barely interact at all, bringing the very term "race relations" into question. "There's still a lot of estrangement out there" between the races, said David Bositis, who writes about racial matters at the Washington-based Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies. "There's still an enormous amount of segregation." Even with sophisticated polls, it's hard to measure the progress, or lack of progress, in race relations. "The prior forms of racism, with hindsight, were relatively easy to deal with," said Kenneth O'Reilly, who has written books on racial politics and now teaches history at Milwaukee Area Technical College. He cited slavery, lynchings and legal and de facto segregation. Now, he said, racial prejudices and grievances are more subtle. "If you ask 100 people what is the main color line problem today," he said, "you get 100 answers." The AP-Yahoo News poll of 2,227 adults was conducted Aug. 27-Sept. 5, and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 2.1 percentage points. It was designed to plumb people's racial attitudes, and particularly how those attitudes affect voting. The survey used the unique methodology of Knowledge Networks, of Menlo Park, Calif., including questions about how well words like "friendly" or "violent" describe blacks; having respondents type sensitive answers into computers, which tends to make them more honest; and using brief flashes of faces of people of different races to detect that people may not be aware they have. Stanford University political scientist Paul Sniderman said that in today's society, racial prejudice "is a deep challenge, and it's one that Americans in general, and for that matter, political scientists, just haven't been ready to acknowledge fully." For minority candidates such as Obama, he said, "there's a penalty for prejudice, and it's not trivial." If the presidential contest remains close, he said, racial prejudice "might be enough to tip the election." ——— Associated Press Director of Surveys Trevor Tompson contributed to this report. ——— On the Net: Polling site: http://news.yahoo.com/polls Copyright © 2008 The Associated Press
Capitol Hill Blue's columnists, blogs and reader comments Capitol Hill Blue is an independent, non-partisan news site that belongs to no political party and subscribes to no political or philosophical point-of-view. Our columnists are welcome to their opinions but readers should understand that their views do not necessarily reflect the editorial policies of this web site. We also welcome comments to selected opinion columns and in our popular ReaderRant discussion forum. Please remember, however, that we believe in civility on this web site and comments may be reviewed, moderated or removed if we feel they contain obscenities, racism, bigotry, anti-Semitic remarks or attack other posters. Our goal is reasoned discussion on issues facing this nation and we do not feel that goal is served by personal attacks and by seeing how many cute adjectives you can attach to an elected official or politician's name. Copyright © 2008 Capitol Hill Blue
|
User login
|
Racial bias/prejudice is
Submitted by JudyB on September 22, 2008 - 11:25am.Racial bias/prejudice is alive, thriving and the deeply hidden secret of far too many over the age of 50 . Disgusting anad as shameful as it is, its a fact though one I am saddened over. The youth of today's America do not feel about many things the same way as their parents and grandparents have and do...ie: race, sexual preference, sexism etc.
Things are changing but unfortunately, it will still be a while until racism is not a major issue at least in this nation.
You are correct Judy. I was
Submitted by Malibu on September 22, 2008 - 12:05pm.You are correct Judy. I was born in California and saw little racism until I went off to college. One year at the University of Idaho (yep, Palin's college) and I found another culture of white people. I lasted there one year and came back to multi-colored Los Angeles. Yes, I am over 50 and hope you are right that racism may soon be something in our past.
Malcolm
JudyB, You got that right.
Submitted by Timr on September 22, 2008 - 12:16pm.JudyB, You got that right. But I, a 58 year old white guy, have been for Obama since before Iowa and have sent him money even tho I am retired and living on a fixed income. My belief is that young people under 30-unless raised in an authoritarian evangelical enviroment(some do break the programing)-mostly count at least 1 multiracial or minority as a friend. Racism will only die when the world intermarries so much that there is no more white/black/asian/hispanic but only brown. The people under 30-if they don't just blow off this election-I believe have the ability to decide who our next president and representives will be. If they don't exercise their right to vote, it will disappear. If McCain is elected by the frightened sheeple then I predict that he will 1-have to reinstatute the draft. But this time it will be universal(except of course for the children of the rich and powerful)and will include for the first time, women.
2-will make the bush tax cuts permanent, but will raise taxes on the working class by making health insurance taxable income and removing the tax writeoff that companies get for giving employees health insurance
3-will use the current financial meltdown to not only privatise Social Security(a very long term goal of the republician party) but to get rid of all the remaining social safty nets-medicare/medicaid and all others that still remain.
4-that within 4 years we will have a universal ID-like a passport-for everyone in the US. And that there will be ID checks at all state borders(this is of course only to protect us from either terrorists or illegal immigrants, whichever is the most feared by the sheeple)The neocons and the oligarchs will realize their dream of a new fascist state-censorship will exist on the internet-thanks to google in China the oligarchs now know it can work- The police state functions had a tryout at the republician convention where scores were arrested for either demonstrating against the republicians or were even planning on doing so.(and no one in the MSM took notice) In another tryout the police arrested over 50 journalists, an act unprecedented in the US. Intimidate and control the MSM. Check. Arrest all demonstrators. Check. Censor the internet. Check. Wiretap americans without warrent. Check. Torture suspects. Check. Load the courts with fellow traveler authoritarians. Check. Scare the crap out of the sheeple with declarations of imminent financial collapse. Check. Make the oligarchs even richer as they feed off what was once a middle class.Check. Make the entire country consumer driven. Put everyone into massive credit card debt. Check. Insure that health insurance will still result in having to pay thousands of dollars if you get sick. Check. Make the sheeple scared in order to pass laws that tighten the grip of the fascists. Check. We are in the end of days, just not the same ones the evangelicals think of. Authoritarianism rules!!!!!
My gut tells me Americas
Submitted by JudyB on September 22, 2008 - 10:05pm.My gut tells me Americas youth will go to the polls.
The educated will vote for Obama because they know to do otherwise will be asking for more of the same..the others will vote for Obama because they can't afford gas for their cars.
I hope thats what my gut is saying and that its not just a bad case of indigestion.
This was already getting old
Submitted by griff on September 22, 2008 - 6:27pm.This was already getting old eight months ago. Let's move on.
But Griff, the problem is
Submitted by Malibu on September 22, 2008 - 8:38pm.But Griff, the problem is getting worse. Will we find that by Nov. 4th the street fights will return as they did in the 60s? Will we again march in the streets against the slaughter that our government got us into in Vietnam? Is there no chance for a change for the future of all of us? Or do we simply go back to 4 years of the Democrats and then 4 years of the GOP and hope we don't blow some nation off the planet?
Malcolm
We should be so fortunate to
Submitted by griff on September 22, 2008 - 9:04pm.We should be so fortunate to have a populace that would take to the streets. I think that this election cycle and its constant drumbeat, as well as the economic conditions, has added fuel to the fire. We've gotten too emotional over this election and have allowed this campaign to become personal. People get personally offended in ways that I've never seen before. Over a stupid campaign between two puppets!?!?
It's an unfortunate part of human nature, and nothing more. It can't be defeated or legislated away, nor will simply electing a black president make it go away. To think otherwise is naive, and I don't think that you are.
Rome wasn't built in a day, and I think the future generations will fare better than we have. Perhaps we're not ready, but at least Obama's candidacy is a first step toward that end, and when he loses - I think he will - I think it's important for people not to overreact. It's not personal - it's politics.
For the record, that is the first - and last - nice thing I'll say about Obama's candidacy. Not because of his race or color, but because he's a Democrat running for President, and I feel the same about his Republican opponent. Neither are fit to run a convenience store, much less America.
griff, we absolutely agree.
Submitted by Malibu on September 23, 2008 - 6:31am.griff, we absolutely agree. Again the choice is between the lesser of two evils. I am no Democrat and never have been but since 1988, I have not been a Republican. I have no interest in the One World Order or Socialism. I have worked for years for a limited government and individual rights but the voting public has no interest in these political qualities. I have written in my candidate's names for years and will again in November with Ron Paul. I will not cave into the two-party candidates who will destroy my form of freedom.
We are breeding incomplete minds in the last couple of generations of students. Our teachers and ministers have ignored the expansion of a future in America. Both are teaching obedience to authority which breeds sheep, not individual humans.
Malcolm