|
Latest Stories
Recent blog posts
|
September 8, 2008 - 6:41am.
When you get past the rabid rhetoric from both sides of the political fence, the partisan political pandering of cable TV networks (Fox on the right, MSNBC on the left) and the too-often inane patter of the blogosphere, you are left with an upcoming Presidential election that will be rough, tough and too close to call. America is a country split down the middle by political, philosophical and cultural differences - a bitter, hybrid nation with no clear consensus, too much anger and too little unity. The fire that once drove the great melting pot has blown out, leaving a hodgepodge of special interests, single-issue political platforms and fragmented panderers driven by targeted demographics instead of leadership. The America that votes on Nov. 4 does so through the fog of anger, misinformation and emotion. Rational debate is gone, replaced by rabid partisanship and disassociated shouting about trivial matters. This country is not a nation governed by an informed electorate. We are a fragmented society driven by fear, hate and hyperbole - a mass of sheep following the pied pipers of propaganda from the right and the left, conservative and liberal, Republican and Democrat. This will not be an election decided by important issues like the economy, Iraq war, and honesty in government or freedom. It will be decided by racism, sexism and raw, unbridled emotion controlled by the basest of human failings. The final decisions made in the voting booth will be based on McCain's age, Obama's skin color and Palin's gender. It should not happen that way, but it will. Too much political debate in this country is filled with invective, childish behavior and outright ignorance. Those who lace their commentary by calling candidates names like "McSame" or "Billary" or worse add no substance to the debate: They only showcase their inability to deal with real issues in a cogent, adult manner. Both sides have good and bad plans for America. Both sides have extremes. Both sides have successes and failures. Both sides have positions that deserve reasoned debate. But such debate is not possible when we get bogged down in name calling and long, drawn out shoutfests that question one candidate's birthright or another's patriotism. Nothing is served by painting one side or the other as evil. In less than two months, we as a people will make a decision that could well decide the survival of a nation in trouble. At this point, I doubt we're up to the task.
Capitol Hill Blue's columnists, blogs and reader comments Capitol Hill Blue is an independent, non-partisan news site that belongs to no political party and subscribes to no political or philosophical point-of-view. Our columnists are welcome to their opinions but readers should understand that their views do not necessarily reflect the editorial policies of this web site. We also welcome comments to selected opinion columns and in our popular ReaderRant discussion forum. Please remember, however, that we believe in civility on this web site and comments may be reviewed, moderated or removed if we feel they contain obscenities, racism, bigotry, anti-Semitic remarks or attack other posters. Our goal is reasoned discussion on issues facing this nation and we do not feel that goal is served by personal attacks and by seeing how many cute adjectives you can attach to an elected official or politician's name. Copyright © 2008 Capitol Hill Blue
|
User login
|
You make us out to be all
Submitted by bryan mcclellan on September 8, 2008 - 6:57am.You make us out to be all too human Doug.
Thanks for a good old kick in the pants.
I got into it with my
Submitted by Janice on September 8, 2008 - 7:50am.I got into it with my son-in-law yesterday. A wonderful guy who loves his family, works hard, and comes from a long line of republicans. He faithfully repeated the republican talking points as were fed to him from Rush, who he listens to while working in the fields - or doing what ever else he is doing on the farm.
Then I went to an Obama listening meeting last evening. I was impressed that the people there (approx. 50 which was 2 1/2 the number expected) were thinking and talking about the real issues facing our country. I tried to tell the organizers there that they are loosing the attention of the media - and of the American public to Palin and the republican hype. I told them they need to be tough in this election, but they felt that taking the high road was the best way. It is in a perfect world, but not when you are dealing with Rove.
I love my son-in-law, and his family is great, too. As long as we leave politics out of the converstaion, we all get along, and have very similar views on a lot of things. We are not all that different. But, when you bring up politics the fur starts flying and the converstaions get heated. This is what the division in this country has done to We the People. This division will not be overcome while the two political parties and Fox/et el are spewing their hate filled dialog over the airways.
Somehow, we have lost our way and our citizenship in this country - becoming democrats, republicans, or independants. Perhaps We the People no longer exist, perhaps the Constitution is only a god-damned piece of paper. I sure hope not, though. I'm not ready to give up on what our founding fathers, in their infinite wisdom, created for us.
If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything.
Mark Twain
Doug, at least part of the
Submitted by keith on September 8, 2008 - 10:38am.Doug, at least part of the problem you so eloquently note is tied directly to the fact that our elections now take too damn long and cost too damn much.
Elections in the USA today have now become an "electoral-industrial-complex" to rival our already horrifically entrenched "military-industrial-complex" (not to mention our ever-expanding "terrorist-industrial-complex"!)
Frankly, what do any of us know now that is fundamentally different than what we already knew three years ago about what each party's slate of candidates stood for? What we've gotten since then is simply the same pablum...its just in different packaging.
Sadly, by the time our elections finally roll around, we voters are so totally exhausted from enduring all the mind-numbing telephone polling, TV ads and other assorted media-hyped electoral BS that most of us are simply glad it's finally OVER!
And, has anyone else noted how our now all-but-perpetual election campaigns have turned us into the laughingstock of the rest of the world?
By contrast, just yesterday (Sunday) our friends to the north in Canada called a national election and set date for October 15th. However, after just a month or so of enduring their own form of mindless political attack ads, Canadians will go to the polls, elect their new Parliament, and then everyone will go back to work.
Gee, what a concept...a national election conducted and OVER in a little more than a month rather than the seemingly PERPETUAL campaign circus we Americans must now {painfully!) endure!
"...MSNBC on the
Submitted by inskeep on September 8, 2008 - 9:13am."...MSNBC on the left..."
Are you serious? MSNBC is on the left? Come on now, you can't actually believe that. MSNBC is the epitome of corporate media, owned by the huge defense contractor making millions of their war against Iraq.
I admit that MSNBC is slightly to the left of extreme right wing Fox News, but their goal is still to shrill for their corporate masters. How anyone could consider them "left" is beyond me.
Jonathan Inskeep
Crofton, MD USA
MSNBC has alienated a lot of
Submitted by sherry on September 8, 2008 - 10:59am.MSNBC has alienated a lot of people. Chris Matthews with chills running up his leg and stating Hillary is only in the race because her husband messed around.
David Shuster had "a problem the Clintons pimping out their daughter"
Keith Olbermann has too many gaffes to note, one of which was the numerous calls for Hillary to get out of the race.
The crew was so in the tank for Obama, Hillary viewers stopped watching and tuned in to Faux News who brought us the Rev Wright story that the MSM had been sitting on for a year.
During the GOP convention, Olbermann told Joe Scarborough to "get a shovel" during Scarborough's coverage.
Tom Brokaw admitted MSNBC has gone too far with their commentary.
You can say they are not biased, but the evidence doesn't support that. Evidence shows they supported the most liberal democratic candidate. Many Americans are pretty much down the middle. Can't stand far left any more than they can stand the far right, but will vote for the more conservative when push comes to shove.
Olberman can be as angry and bitter as he likes, the above fact will not change.
And what about Fox, Sherry?
Submitted by Southerner on September 8, 2008 - 9:11pm.And what about Fox, Sherry? Are you going to say that you think they are fair and unbiased and only present carefully documented facts to the public? Whatever else Olberman does, regardless of how annoying he can be, he usually has his facts straight and when he's been wrong he corrects himself and sometimes even apologizes. Honestly, has Fox ever done that? I'd really like to hear what you have to say to that question, an honest and thoughtful answer.
Southerner, I would NEVER
Submitted by sherry on September 9, 2008 - 8:03am.Southerner, I would NEVER say Faux News is fair and balanced. NEVER.
I will say that I never expected them to be as fair as they are. They did a fluff piece on BHO which nearly had me gagging but ok. Billo also interviewed Obama (BHO finally found his cajones). They also did a fluff on Palin.
And yes, I have seen Billo correct himself.
Finally, Olbermann went with one source in stating Hillary had met with the Canadians regarding NAFTA. She did NOT by the way. Olbermann and Matthews are not just in the tank for BHO, they are obnoxious about it.
At least Faux has something that resembles professionalism. More than I can say for BSNBC.
During the primaries, Faux News did not attempt to annoint one candidate over another as Olbermann and Matthews did.
Olbermann never had anyone on who disagreed with him.
You can diss Faux all you want, but MSNBC has gone from the go to network to an Obama orgy.
So we share a disdain for
Submitted by Southerner on September 9, 2008 - 4:04pm.So we share a disdain for Fox News. At least maybe we do. I'm not sure.
You use the derogatory term of choice for Fox haters, "Faux News," yet you defend them against MSNBC. Fox makes things up when it suits their purposes, not even bothering with "one source," as you accused MSNBC of doing. If you deny that Fox is not guilty of reporting that is every bit as shoddy as you accuse Olbermann of doing, then I think you're in deep denial and beyond reach of reason. I honestly don't mean to offend you here, but I can't fathom how you can call Fox News a "professional" operation, if by professional you mean competent, even-handed, and sincerely willing to diligently search out the truth and report it.
You're right about Olbermann not having anyone on his show who disagrees with his viewpoint. I go back and forth about that. On the one hand, it does seem that if you're going to have any claim to being objective, you have to allow the other side to speak. But then, there doesn't seem to be any real objective discussion of the issues anymore. It just seems to turn into a shouting match between the people on opposite sides of the fence, and whoever is hosting the show – the one who’s supposed to be the “journalist” – doesn’t seem to have the guts to stop the shouting and start asking everybody tough, penetrating questions or even acknowledge when someone with an opposing view makes a legitimate point. These contests of dueling talking points always seem to end with the so-called journalist saying, in one way or another, "That’s all we have time for today, we’ll see what happens," or some other cliche.
I do wish that Olbermann lived up more to the character and methods of his apparent idol, Edward R. Murrow. I wasn't around when Murrow was in his prime on TV, but my perception is that he was tough, fearless but subdued, sure of himself but open-minded and knew that his job was to report the story, not be a part of it. There doesn't seem to be any of that around these days. Maybe it's the 24-hour cable/Internet news cycle that's caused that because you can't just report the news any more, you have to have an angle that the other guys don't have. Or maybe our colleges and universities just are not producing good, hard-nosed, fair-minded journalists anymore. It’s been said that journalism used to be a blue-collar job, but now it’s all about star-power and egos and “reporters” being seen as equals to the famous, powerful people they interview.
As for Tom Brokaw being an authority on what constitutes the boundary of acceptable journalism, well, Brokaw is an actor, not a reporter. He’s not Murrow, or Cronkite, or Bill Moyers, or even Dan Rather, who was at least willing to put his job on the line for a story he knew could blow up in his face. And so bleeping what if MSNBC supports what you consider to be a liberal candidate? When was the last time Fox supported anyone other than a right-wing Republican?
As far as "anointing" a candidate goes, I think Hillary and her supporters pretty well started that long before anyone else. When the campaign started, I assumed that she'd get the nomination and I'd vote for her. But she really started turning me off with what I perceived to be an attitude of entitlement. And I think it's clear that she turned an awful lot of other people off as well. I don't recall hearing anyone other than her loudest supporters say that she ran a flawless campaign. Do you think she didn’t make big mistakes?
Then Obama surprised her and lots of other people by actually running a competent, well-organized and very effective campaign, and when things started going against her, she became, in my opinion and in the opinions of millions of other Democrats, a disciple of the Karl Rove school of politics.
If she hadn't switched to a totally negative campaign, she'd probably be the nominee today. And if you're going to insist that she did not run one of the strangest primary campaigns that a Democrat has ever run against an opponent of their own party, please answer this: If she wasn't running a Republican-style all-negative campaign in which she'd concluded that the enemy of my enemy is my friend, why in the world did she genuflect to and seek the support of Richard Scaife? How could she see him as anything other than a bitter opponent of just about everything she’s ever said she stood for? That was a mind-boggling contradiction of so many of the convictions she'd claimed to hold, and to me that one action alone was enough to convince me that she was willing to throw the Democratic Party overboard in pursuit of her own lust for power.
I assume you'll disagree with me. If you do, please explain why.
That is as fine a job of
Submitted by bryan mcclellan on September 9, 2008 - 5:52pm.That is as fine a job of nailing the Jello to a tree as I have ever seen. Good show Southerner.
The reason our news is so
Submitted by sherry on September 9, 2008 - 11:27pm.The reason our news is so slanted is because the media is a corporate owned profit center. This is why most of us watch several channels and get most of our news on the net. I like foreign news as well. Just for perspective. Yeah, I have been known to read Al Jazerra. Pretty sure I am on the no fly list now.
Hillary made huge mistakes. First off, she hired Patty Solis Doyle, whose husband's brother serves on Chicago city council. Once Doyle was fired, Maggie Williams came on board and Hillary began to win and win big. Hillary also found her voice. Even Doug, (who gives no one a pass) said truthfully, Hillary has more mental toughness than any of them. That mental toughness for hanging on amid calls to quit impressed me.
Don't talk to me about Rove politics. Obama just today said "You know, if you put lipstick on a pig, it's still a pig"
He now has a team of lawyers in Alaska digging for dirt. I doubt he is planning a puff piece. Attacking Palin is a mistake. Huge. First off, Obama needs those pissed off women. Going after her and not McCain is going to make him look sexist, petty and weak. When he is going after Palin, he is not focusing on issues or drawing a contrast between himself and McCain.
As for Richard Scaife, politics makes for strange bedfellows.
At this point, Obama is off his game. He is making mistakes. Isn't it ironic, he came out of nowhere, nailed Hillary and now Palin a VP choice is getting under his skin?
Obama doesn't want us to talk about his community organizing anymore. It is now a racial slur. Heck, that is a quarter of his thin resume.
Bottom line is, Obama naive and arrogant. That is a bad combination for what we are facing in this nation.
Sherry...I was one of the
Submitted by JudyB on September 9, 2008 - 2:02am.Sherry...I was one of the people they alienated. By the time you read this reply you will have already heard that MSNBC has replaced Matthews & Olbermann doing their anchormens job for the debates and election night..they have not yet been fired or quit that I know of. MSNBC will be having in their place David Gregory and "news castors" from NBC.
I only wish that FOX would get rid of Hannity and O'Reilly then democracy may have a fighting chance...but thats just a pipe dream of mine..FOX is a merely a code word for GOP
deleted
Submitted by sherry on September 8, 2008 - 11:05am.deleted
Thanks Doug for so
Submitted by Stratocaster on September 8, 2008 - 9:26am.Thanks Doug for so eloquently stating what I have been feeling for some time. Of the people, by the people, for the people works for a group of like minded people that have a national identity. America has become so diverse that it has no identity. To try to please everyone is to please no one. America has more factions than Iraq and for the gun lobbyists to arm those factions is a formula for disaster. The question is how do we get back to e pluribus unum, from many one.
Janice , I had a similar
Submitted by Jim C on September 8, 2008 - 10:55am.Janice , I had a similar experance last week with my partner at work , she's married to a republican and much of her family are republicans , but she has always been a democrat . She asked me what I thought of Palin , I told her I thought she was awful . She told me she likes her , that some cousin of hers who lived in Alaska who was a life long democrat had told her how great she was and that she ( the cousin ) was going to vote for her . We then got into a discussion of the subject in which she told me that , if Obama is elected he will increase the deficit , there will be race riots and on and on . She was a veritable fountain of right wing talking points , she had been a Hillary supporter . I was absolutely dumbfounded by this sudden conversion and the way she was swallowing this crap hook line and sinker . I have another friend at work that has been railing on about Obama being a muslim , having some kind of secret muslim agenda among other mindbendingly inane nonsense . He got it from the book " Obama nation " which he heard discussed on the " Alex Jones " radio program . I tried to explain that that book had been throughly debunked and many of the sources had even recanted , but were used anyway . I asked him to fact check his sources , I just get a blank look , I might as well talk to the wall . I am encountering this kind of thing more and more . I believe that a lot of it is simple racism . Some whites are just using any justification not to vote for Obama while not wanting to admit their real reason . The republicans understand this oh to well and are throwing this stuff out by the bucketfull for those so inclined to cling to , and it seems to be working .
Jim C, you might be better
Submitted by Timr on September 8, 2008 - 12:30pm.Jim C, you might be better off talking to a wall. What you have discovered is classic authoritarian follower(AF) behavior. AFs will believe whatever their designated/chosen Authoritarian leaders(AL) tell them. If it is a direct contradiction from something that the AL said yesterday, fine. The AF can absorb the new viewpoint and remove the old from his memory as if it had never happened. This is unfortunately a trend that I see continuing in the US over the next 20-50 years. The rise of Authoritarianism in the US has been slowly increasing over the last 40 years but it is starting to become pervasive. Within the next 20-30 years I believe that Authoritarianism will become dominant within the US. The New American Century Neocons-NACN-oligarchs who consist of the following groups; Big Energy, Big Arms, Big Media and Big Jesus, will continue to exploit this group-many of whom are the "low information voter" or sheeple-along with the rest of the sheeple who comprise about 50% of the american electorate. Doug was correct, but he did not go deep enough. The NACN is determined to elect McCain as president, while they understand that revulsion at the republicians currently in congress and at the sudden and massive change that bush brought with him will mean some revision in their ideas and the dems taking more control of congress, their long term goal is nothing less than to get a president who will retain all of bushs powers and will work to increase them. Making congress into a rubber stanp for whatever the president wants to do. People resist change, the NACN attempted to do to much with Bush so we get the backlash.But the trend will continue. More power to the president until he becomes an elected dictator. The next step would be to rescind the bill of rights and install a state religion. Then the president would also be the head of the state church. I believe that within 50 years we will become a theocratic oligarchy. Authoritarianism + militarism+ religious orthodoxy=a theocratic military dictatorship. We are fast becoming the most ignorant group of people on the planet because of the corporate censorship of the MSM. Yes Yes, I know. The internet is still free from censorship, however there are still about 50% or more who still have nothing to do with computers. But there is still the net neutrality bill out there somewhere. When the internet is harnessed by the Service Providers they will be the ones who will decide what everyone sees and hears. I am 58 years old and I have watched over the years as we have changed as a people in how we no longer protest the actions of our govt even when it breaks both the law and the constitution. In how the govt controls how people travel thru the 'terrorist watch list' and Homeland Defense. Travel gets restricted, passports are needed to travel to countries where none was needed. Soon checkpoints will go up and ID's will be checked for travel between states. Then everyone will need passports to travel outside their states.(all in the name of preventing terrorism of course) A police state will rise up-you saw the begining at St. Paul-and no mention will be made by our MSM. We have become the ultimate consumer society, we are easily distracted by shiny objects and new TV's. Other countries are surging ahead of us in every way from infastructure to health care to political freedoms, meanwhile we endlessly debate evolution vs creationism. So we fall further behind other countries in science and computer tech and start the long slow slide into oblivion. But fear not, our military remains #1. at least in spending, as we are currently outspending the entire rest of the world combined. A professional military which has become suborned by the oligarchs and now does their bidding. Oil was behind our invasion of Iraq and Afghanstan.Big Energy almost won when they attempted an end run to regain their ownership of the Iraq oil fields. They failed when Iraq signed over the oil fields to China. The plan, to milk the golden calf that is the US, continues apace. I do not believe that there is any possibility at this time of stopping them. In the near term they will control both major political parties so it will not matter who we elect as both sides work for the same people.
got in the koolaid did you?
Submitted by Harve3 on September 8, 2008 - 5:45pm.got in the koolaid did you? timr.
Hill Country resident
What you have discovered is
Submitted by JerZGirl on September 9, 2008 - 10:30am.Sounds pretty much like a cult to me, don't you think?
--------------------------------------------------
"There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need but not for man's greed." ~ Mohandas K. Gandhi
Thank you timr. How
Submitted by Stratocaster on September 8, 2008 - 2:54pm.Thank you timr. How refreshing it is to hear from someone that gets it. The average fat ass American is so dumb that he not only believes but can't wait to run out to buy what he saw on the latest TV commercial. Maybe if we ran an add for suicide it would improve the gene pool. Oh yeah, the Muslims have already thought of that. Here we just join the military.
Stratocaster, you ever
Submitted by Warren on September 9, 2008 - 1:53am.Stratocaster, you ever considered putting together a stand-up comedy act? You'd do well.
Another good one Doug, for
Submitted by griff on September 8, 2008 - 2:55pm.Another good one Doug, for all it's worth. It's good to see that you had the mind to add Freedom to the list of items not being discussed in this campaign.
"A popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: And a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives." - Sam Adams
Sam Adams was right, we have both a Farce and a Tragedy.
Timr , I am 58 also , it
Submitted by Jim C on September 8, 2008 - 6:36pm.Timr , I am 58 also , it seems we have the same generational perspective . You are correct in your assessment , I believe this started during reagans administration by allowing the networks to move the news from a required public service to profit driven entertainment . The dumbing down of the public and control of the disbursement of information by a few very conservative corporations is the result . What the public in general does not realize is that the real goal of conservatism is nothing but a kind of calvinistic plutocracy . This is nothing more than the aristocrats trying to restore what they believe is the natural order of things , a small ruling aristocracy who cortrol the wealth and resources with everybody else serfs that serve them as labor and cannon fodder . To this mindset the very idea of a middleclass that can tell their betters how they wish to be treated and that share in the wealth is an abomination that must be corrected . To accomplish this , they need to limit education , access to information , convince their would be serfs that what is in the wealthy's interest is also in their interest and distract from the reality of what their real aims are , we might not go for it otherwise . The historical tools are religon , nationalism , brute force , fear of those who are different and keeping the peasants uneducated with as little free time as possible . Just look back through history , a hundred years ago , 2 , 3 , 4, 5 hundred , a thousand years ago and see how it worked and if these " conservatives " don't seem much like the land barons , fiefdoms and robberbarons of old , nothings changed , our selfanointed superiors are simply working to regain their place . and put us back in ours . If Elizabeth Bathory and the black prince were alive today they would no doubt have been at the republican convention waving flags and cheering them on , they are their modern brethren .
Wow, Jim C gets it too.
Submitted by Stratocaster on September 8, 2008 - 8:53pm.Wow, Jim C gets it too. That makes four people that get it. Are we on a roll here or what?
Concur with JimC, Timr and
Submitted by ekaton on September 8, 2008 - 10:35pm.Concur with JimC, Timr and Strat.
There is nothing other than an ongoing class war in this country. The latest example is the "government" (TAXPAYERS) bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, both of which have made record profits for their stockholders over the past few years through fraudulent real estate lending and bundling and reselling the loans. Now the bubble pops and it is up to the taxpayers to bear the losses and NOT the stockholders because FM & FM are "too big to fail". Presumably the stockholders bear great risk in anticipation of great reward. Who holds stock in these concerns? VERY FEW middle class and poorer people, but certainly the very wealthy individuals and institutions who also control the government, the very same people who have declared that the taxpayers must bear the losses. Its class war, nothing more, nothing less. And we are losing.
-- Kent Shaw, age 58
So what's new?
Submitted by Warren on September 9, 2008 - 2:01am.So what's new? Everything Doug has said is absolutely true. And it's depressing and discouraging and humiliating. What it isn't is new news. American politics has been more about personality and spin than substance and truth for as long as we Americans have been voting, with very rare exceptions.
FM & FM.
Submitted by Warren on September 9, 2008 - 2:23am.FM & FM. They never should have been created in the first place. There is no way that providing mortgages is the government's job. FM & FM were created with an implied government backing. Thus they were perceived to be guaranteed return for fat cat investors, with any risk implicitly assumed by the taxpayers. Bad idea.
But hold on a second. Who was it who wanted FM & FM? Fannie Mae was created in 1938 as part of Franklin Roosevelt's 'New Deal'. Ladies and Gentlemen, it's a purely Democrat creation. The idea was to have big brother provide the backing so that the little folks could afford homes and mortgages.
-Warren, age 57
Freddie Mac and Freddie Mae
Submitted by Lillibet on September 9, 2008 - 5:50am.Freddie Mac and Freddie Mae were more the creation of the Federal Reserve, than a purely Democratic creation. A little history on the central bankers might enrich your understanding of the origins of the problems with the economy run on fiat money, created from nothing, designed to enrich bankers at the expense of the nation. Lillibet
Allowing lower and middle
Submitted by Malibu on September 9, 2008 - 6:52am.Allowing lower and middle class to buy their own homes was a good idea but they should have been forced to keep the payments up without a bail out from the government. Had the congress kept their eyes open when the value of the America dollar was falling along with the jobs kept at home, it would have worked.
America is in a recession that could possibly destroy the building of more homes and businesses. A lazy congress has destroyed the base of our nation's economy.
Our elections are won by candidates who promise tax breaks and hand outs that eventually bring about exactly what we see happening today. We have no candidates who understand supply and demand with the possible exception of Ron Paul. Had we held the congress's feet to the fire on controlled spending, we would be in much better shape.
Instead, we vote for moral values without a look back at our economics. The Republican Party failed to warn us about this borrowing money from nations who are not our friends and all they have offered is the legislation of sins through the Supreme Court. The Democrats have not offered any corrections except more government controls.
The America that votes on
Submitted by rbw152 on September 9, 2008 - 8:02am.The America that votes on Nov 4th is also a country that says it separates church and state, yet those running for office nevertheless seem very keen on advertising their religious credentials - and the more rabidly radical they are the better.
It is a country that espouses freedom of speech yet rounds up hundreds of protesters and arrests them on trumped up 'terrorism' charges, while invading their homes and stealing their property.
It is a country that says it is a democracy, yet this system is not enshrined in law anywhere within it's legal or political framework. And votes are stolen or wiped out, while thousands of voters are expunged from lists for spurious reasons, with no legal redress.
It is a country that prides itself on it's press and news organisations, yet these are all in the hands of just a small number of politically motivated people, whose only interests are to control what people hear and see and to subvert news to the level of propaganda.
It is a country that has spent close to three trillion dollars on a pointless war that has killed many thousands of innocent people - and then wonders why it is despised by so many.
And because of the horror stories regarding the unwelcoming face presented by the TSA and Homeland Security from innocent people merely trying to visit your once great country - or even just transit through it on the way to soomewhere else - it is not a place I will be visiting any time soon.
Legislation of virtue is
Submitted by Lillibet on September 9, 2008 - 8:16am.Legislation of virtue is impossible. Whether it is fiscal responsibility, or virtue in the bedroom it doesn't work. Goes double when you consider that in, I believe, 2003, HUD had off balance losses of $59 Billion. They simply could not find the money. However, those favored few at the top of the food chain, acquired some amazing salaries and bonuses.
Our present government is run like a cabal, feeding those they favor, starving the rest. Those being fed are eating very well indeed.
One small consolation is that when you review the establishment of Prohibition, they at least realized then that legislating virtue regarding demon rum, required at minimum a Constitutional Amendment.
These days, all it takes is a kleptocracy bedecked in flag pins, proudly waving the red, white and blue, with disdain for all that don't agree with every bit of Theocratic intrusiveness they believe others must endure, while their own personal lives are more Peyton Place than Scruple Street. Lillibet
May I address a couple of
Submitted by Jim C on September 9, 2008 - 10:03am.May I address a couple of assertians made in two of the above posts . 1st. the shareholders in both freddie mac and fannie may are getting killed . both have dropped as of monday to the status of penny stocks , practically worthless . The only entities that will come out of this smelling like a rose are the very top of their management team , the CEO ,COO CFO etc , they're just fine , salery , bonus's , severance package and retirement , all in tack and huge . They simply packed up and slithered out the door unscathed as usual .
2nd. Both companys are private , that is the problem , they were slowly privatized until they no longer had to comply with the oversite , regulations and sound fiscal practices that would have been required if backed by the FED as are banks and other such federally ( FDIC ) backed institutions . That is at the core of this whole morgage based meltdown . These institutions ( morgage based lenders ) , Country wide , Bear sterns , yep , that was their downfall too etc . They were allowed by years or deregulation to avoid sound fiscal practices and participate in fast buck scheme after fast buck scheme untill the whole thing finally collapsed . The guys who are actually responsible for this mess made out like bandits ( which is exactly what they are ) . They are the ones who promoted and bundled gobs of shaky and ill advised morgages and sold them to these essentually deregulated institutions who didn't bother to check how weak or nonexistant the financial backing was behind those instriments . The fact is , the individuals who caused this are going to be untouched and allowed to keep their vast profits from this disasterous scheme . Its the shareholders and taxpayers who will be hammered and will take the financial hit . If congress would simply pass legislation that would allow confiscation of profits and prosecution of the originators of these schemes that would be a good start and a deterrent . And for god sake reregulate the bastards .