Home

Google

Web Capitol Hill Blue

 
August 6, 2008 - 7:14am.

(AFP)

Republican presidential candidate John McCain opposes the $300 billion farm bill and subsidies for ethanol, positions that both supporters and opponents say might cost him votes he needs in the upper Midwest this November.

His Democratic rival, Barack Obama, is making a more traditional regional pitch: He favors the farm bill approved by Congress this year and subsidies for the Midwest-based ethanol industry. McCain instead has promised to open new markets abroad for farmers to export their commodities.

In his position papers, McCain opposes farm subsidies only for those with incomes of more than $250,000 and a net worth above $2 million. But he's gone further on the stump.

"I don't support agricultural subsidies no matter where they are," McCain said at a recent appearance in Wisconsin. "The farm bill, $300 billion, is something America simply can't afford."

McCain later described the measure, which is very popular throughout the Midwest, as "a $300 billion, bloated, pork-barrel-laden bill" because of subsidies for industries like ethanol.

It's not a stand that pleases Republican Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa.

"I would not advise him to take that position," Grassley said. "For sure, he can't lose Missouri and that's in the upper Midwest. Could he lose Iowa, Minnesota and Wisconsin and still be elected president? Yes, but I wouldn't advise him to have that strategy."

Grassley, a conservative Republican, and his Senate colleague from Iowa, liberal Democrat Tom Harkin, have achieved enduring success in this state largely by mastering the politics of farm issues. Harkin chairs the Senate Agriculture Committee, which wrote the new farm legislation.

"I don't see any scenario in which McCain can get to the White House without carrying some upper Midwestern states," said Harkin, an Obama backer. "I've never really understood in all my years why Sen. McCain has gone out of his way to speak against and vote against policies that are important to the upper Midwest."

There's a history of close elections in the region. President Bush carried Indiana, Iowa, Missouri, North Dakota and South Dakota in 2004, earning 35 electoral votes. But his Democratic opponent, John Kerry, prevailed in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Illinois, giving him 41 electoral votes.

Veteran GOP strategist Gentry Collins said McCain can defend his record on farm issues, including opposing "corporate welfare" for big operations, but he said there's more at work.

"The upper Midwest is crucial in this election, and Midwestern voters value authenticity. They value experience," Collins said. "I don't think agricultural issues are the only issues Midwestern voters care about. There are some bigger-picture issues, broader issues where he's strong."

But on another important issue to Midwesterners, McCain opposed a tax break for developing wind power. Obama supported the tax break.

"We're employing close to 2,000 people right now in Iowa in the wind energy industry," Harkin said.

McCain has been most outspoken on ethanol subsidies, and that has Republicans worried in Iowa, the nation's biggest producer of the fuel. Other top ethanol producers include Illinois, Minnesota, Indiana, Ohio, Wisconsin and Missouri.

"It does challenge him in states like Iowa, the No. 1 ethanol state," said Bill Northey, Iowa's Republican agriculture secretary. "It does make it tougher to make the case."

Drake University political science professor Dennis Goldford said McCain's problem on farm issues reflects a deeper issue he faces as he's courted conservative GOP activists, many of whom are deeply suspicious of him.

"He's essentially reverting to standard Republican supply-side economics," said Goldford. "That's where he's got a problem. He's got to find his own voice and so far he hasn't had a voice."

Iowa Gov. Chet Culver, a Democrat who has campaigned for Obama, said he's puzzled by McCain's position. He points to other Republicans who have a different view.

"President Bush and I just had a good conversation about how critically important ethanol is, and how Iowa is positioned so well to lead the nation," said Culver. "I have no idea why John McCain doesn't support it. It hurts him in Indiana, and Missouri and Ohio, and it's not the message right now that any of us want to hear."

Obama has a modest lead in national polls, but electoral votes will decide the election. Obama is poised to do well on both coasts, while McCain is favored in the South and some parts of the West. That leaves the upper Midwest as a swing battleground.

"The Midwest is crucial in this campaign," said Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, a Democrat and an early backer of Obama. "Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin and perhaps Indiana are very important states. McCain is behind, and he's in danger of falling further behind."

»

"I don't support

"I don't support agricultural subsidies no matter where they are," McCain said at a recent appearance in Wisconsin. "The farm bill, $300 billion, is something America simply can't afford."

But we can afford $4566 PER SECOND in Iraq INDEFINITELY!

When I lived in Mexico several years ago, I could not understand why milk costs over $6 PER GALLON at Walmart or Costco until a friend pointed out that in Mexico there were no federal subisdies helping the dairy farmers.

Since McSame is a corporate man who wants to cut corporate income taxes, apparently he only wants the agri-corps to survive so they can provide us with their cloned beef, milk full of female hormones, and genetically modified food.

I wonder how many family farms could benefit from the bill that McSame opposes. Apparently, Republican Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa doesn't agree with McSame.

"I would not advise him to take that position," Grassley said. "For sure, he can't lose Missouri and that's in the upper Midwest. Could he lose Iowa, Minnesota and Wisconsin and still be elected president? Yes, but I wouldn't advise him to have that strategy."

And then there's his vote against wind power so his oil buddies can continue to profit at our expense.

All of this is just more PROOF that McSame is too old and and out of touch with America. He just doesn't get it and apparently isn't interested in getting it either.

McSame obviously thinks he is the "Decider" now.

»

I like how McCain claims to

I like how McCain claims to support a comprehensive energy policy when it comes to drilling for oil but he does not want to support wind power.

Or how we can afford trillions for war and nothing for farmers.

It's a rare treat to see doublethink in action in the candidates themselves.

»

Well, from recent press

Well, from recent press reports, he has no problem with huge tax breaks for big oil! Wake up America, this man is nothing short of a Bush third term in disguise! He claims to be a mavirick, but has voted for actions supporting the Bush administration 95% of the time. Remember: "bomb, bomb, bomb, Iran," "...we may be in Iraq for 100 years...." and "...we will leave with Victory..." without even explaining what that Victory is! YOU WILL DESERVE WHO YOU VOTE INTO OFFICE, so, be careful!

»

I agree with McCain on this

I agree with McCain on this one. No more subsidies for agricorp.

»

the problem is the bill is

the problem is the bill is about removing subsidies from agri-corps..in other words...to help the small family farmer where they were originally intended. What has happened is the agri-corps have capitalized on loopholes which this bill is addressing.

So by voting against the bill he is essentially keeping the current subsidies for the agri-corps in place while he says something completely different to a public that doesn't know the difference.

That's why you have bi-partisan support in the areas that are primarily effected by this.

»

Yup. The agri-corps will

Yup.
The agri-corps will continue to get...errr..AHEM..."funding".
The small family farmer, for whom the subsidies were originally intended?
He'll get another couple of hit records by John Mellencamp and Bruce Springsteen, and maybe Willie Nelson will play another Farm-Aid concert but otherwise the small family farm will be finally FINISHED, which is really what John McCain is hoping will be yet another
"MISSION ACCOMPLISHED", only he will call it
"vertical integration for agri-business in the market sector".

The small family farmer will call it something that should not be said in polite company, because he will have voted for McCain anyway, fearing that all he has heard from heartland talk radio about that "colored guy from Illinois" might be true.

And McCain is banking on that.

»

Capitol Hill Blue's columnists, blogs and reader comments

Capitol Hill Blue is an independent, non-partisan news site that belongs to no political party and subscribes to no political or philosophical point-of-view. Our columnists are welcome to their opinions but readers should understand that their views do not necessarily reflect the editorial policies of this web site. We also welcome comments to selected opinion columns and in our popular ReaderRant discussion forum. Please remember, however, that we believe in civility on this web site and comments may be reviewed, moderated or removed if we feel they contain obscenities, racism, bigotry, anti-Semitic remarks or attack other posters. Our goal is reasoned discussion on issues facing this nation and we do not feel that goal is served by personal attacks and by seeing how many cute adjectives you can attach to an elected official or politician's name.

Copyright © 2008 Capitol Hill Blue

Sign up for Capitol Hill Blue's email newsletter
Get our headlines each morning.

Email:

Syndicate

Syndicate content

User login