News Categories



Capitol Hill Blue is a not-for-profit, non-commercial experiment in on-line journalism published as an information resource for our readers. All material is © 2006 Capitol Hill Blue. For more information, please check out our FAQ. We take your privacy seriously at Capitol Hill Blue.
CHB Home / Half-Shell Home/ Print This Page / Email this page

White House adds anti-gay language to security clearance requirements

March 15, 2006 01:57 AM / Bush Leagues .

By KATHERINE SHRADER

The Bush administration last year quietly rewrote the rules for allowing gays and lesbians to receive national-security clearances, drawing complaints from civil rights activists.

The Bush administration said security clearances cannot be denied "solely on the basis of the sexual orientation of the individual." But it removed language saying sexual orientation "may not be used as a basis for or a disqualifying factor in determining a person's eligibility for a security clearance."

The White House sought to play down the changes, approved by President Bush in December, as an effort to ensure the security clearance rules are consistent with a 1995 executive order about access to classified information.

"The minor language change did not and was not intended to alter the way sexual orientation is treated," National Security Council spokesman Frederick Jones said Tuesday. "The U.S. government policy has not changed in any way."

Jones said government lawyers made the changes for clarity.

Gay rights activists expressed concern that the new guidelines could lead to a chipping away of safeguards obtained in the 1990s for gays and lesbians seeking security-related government jobs.

Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign, said Bush's rules could "open the door for broader interpretation" of rules granting security clearances for national security-related jobs.

"It is not surprising to me that this administration is continuing to roll the clock back on the most basic of protections granted by the last administration," said Solmonese, whose group advocates for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender civil rights.

Lesbian and gay advocacy groups recently found the change in an 18-page document distributed by National security adviser Stephen Hadley on Dec. 29, without public notice.

Several million civilian and military personnel who work for the U.S. government and its contractors must go through extensive reviews to determine if they've exhibited behavior that could compromise national security or make them susceptible to blackmail.

Areas of concern include drug and alcohol use, criminal activity, financial debt, foreign contacts and sexual behavior. Officials at several national security agencies were not immediately aware of the new rules or any impact.

Rules approved by President Clinton in 1997 said that sexual behavior may be a security concern if it involves a criminal offense, suggests an emotional disorder, could subject someone to coercion or shows a lack of judgment.

The regulation stated that sexual orientation "may not be used as a basis for or a disqualifying factor in determining a person's eligibility for a security clearance."

Bush removed that categorical protection, saying instead that security clearances cannot be denied "solely on the basis of the sexual orientation of the individual."

The new rules say behavior that is "strictly private, consensual and discreet" could "mitigate security concerns."

Jones said the new language was meant to ensure the U.S. security clearance guidelines are consistent with Clinton's executive order. He said the order makes clear that the U.S. government does not discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation when granting access to classified information.

Steve Ralls, spokesman for the Washington-based Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, said his organization is still sorting out what the administration intended so that attorneys can provide guidance to gay and lesbian personnel on how to answer questions during government background checks.

"It looks as if lesbian and gay service members especially may face some additional roadblocks to obtaining their security clearances," said Ralls, whose group advocates on behalf of gays and lesbians in the military.

He said his organization has been getting calls from service members who don't understand the changes. "In the law, subtlety can have even unintended, major consequences. We are very concerned _ and curious," he said.

___

On the Net:

See the National Archives and Records Administration copy of the policy: http://www.archives.gov/isoo/

© 2006 The Associated Press

© Copyright 2006 by Capitol Hill Blue

Comments

When will the homophobes of this country grow up and leave Gays and Lesbians alone. Sexual preferences have nothing to do with patriotism, military service nor security clearances.

All this preoccupation with "what others' sexual activities are" is a waste of time and money. Better to focus on the "Good christians that steal from Target, Build TV empires peddling Christ & the Bible or are addicted to gambling and prescription drugs because- they are vulnerable to blackmail."

Posted by Joe Roy at March 15, 2006 09:24 AM

I remember back in 2001 when I was interviewed for my clearance, I was asked by the investigator if my roommate and I were in a "marriage-like relationship." Being both men, and having told her I was gay, I didn't feel any concern with answering "yes" to her question.

When re-investigation time comes around again, I'm now a little more concerned about having this area of my life probed (pun intended).

Posted by corbett at March 15, 2006 11:07 AM

Does this language cover (hetro) sexaholics who are doing one night stands every weekend with strangers?

Posted by SET at March 15, 2006 12:16 PM

And another thing, I have found that fanatics, cultists, and religious maniacs are never stable people. And it's not just the shoplifting they've been known to do to relieve stress. Is there is a chapter on this in the clearance manuals?

Posted by SET at March 15, 2006 12:36 PM

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated and will not be posted if they contain insults, flaming of other posters, profanity or libelous comments. Comments that are off topic will be deleted. Thanks for waiting.)


Top of Page

RECENT STORIES

Sign up for our Daily Newsletter mailing list!