News Categories



Capitol Hill Blue is a not-for-profit, non-commercial experiment in on-line journalism published as an information resource for our readers. All material is © 2006 Capitol Hill Blue. For more information, please check out our FAQ. We take your privacy seriously at Capitol Hill Blue.
CHB Home / Half-Shell Home/ Print This Page / Email this page

Not much when it comes to alternatives

March 31, 2006 06:59 AM / Opinion .

By DAN K. THOMASSON

While the Republicans are seeking to heal the wounds of divisiveness caused by the immigration issue and the president's falling ratings, Democrats are hard at work trying to convince the nation they can be trusted with national security. It is clearly a theme that will be aired over and over in the coming election as the minority party in Congress tries to regain control of one or both houses lost more than a decade ago.

So far, however, neither party seems to be making much headway as polls show voters turned off of both. The immigration question, perhaps the most important domestic issue in the spring and summer campaign season leading up to the November midterm elections, pits the moderates against the conservatives, the Senate against the House, those looking at the nation's unskilled labor necessities against those who see 12 million illegal aliens as lawbreakers siphoning off taxpayers money for support services they shouldn't have.

Democrats clearly view George Bush's downward spiral of approval as a rare opportunity to take back what they came to believe was their political birthright during 40 years of ruling the House _ if only they can overcome what has been their Achilles heel the last two presidential elections, an impression that they are weak on defense. Having suffered the indignities of impotency, they are pulling out all the stops to bolster their own security image while painting the situation in Iraq as a quagmire from which only they can extricate the nation.

Four of the party's top leaders, including House and Senate Democratic chiefs Nancy Pelosi of California and Harry Reid of Nevada, and two Democratic military experts from the Armed Services Committees of both houses, Rep. Ike Skelton of Missouri and Jack Reed of Rhode Island, laid out their main mission to reporters at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast Wednesday. The message: The way out of both Iraq and the terrorist dilemma is a rejuvenation of congressional oversight and that can come only by restoring the Democrats to their rightful control. No more rubberstamping the policies of the current president as they charge Republicans have done.

They said nothing about whether rubberstamping might return should the next president be a member of their own party. Nor did they have a better timetable for leaving Iraq than the 2008 predicted by Bush at a press conference recently. In fact, they pretty much reiterated all those things the administration has been saying are necessary to end U.S. military participation with the creation of a lasting democracy over there. These are the illusive three Vs of Iraq policy, military victory, economic victory and political victory, none of which seem near achievement.

The first stage, they all agreed, was something called "redeployment," allowing U.S. troops to move away from hot zones that would be left to the Iraqi military to cool down and control. Infantry troops would be gradually withdrawn while logistical support forces would remain to help the Iraqis. The nation would have to improve economically and there would have to be a viable Iraqi government.

So what's new? This has been the goal all along. Reaching it is what has been difficult. Without a stable Iraqi government, any withdrawal would be disastrous. Reid agreed with the 2008 date for total withdrawal "as long as it is in an orderly fashion." Well, good luck to that.

The truth of the matter is that the Democrats have no easy solution to the Iraq problem nor do they offer much of one to the failures of the Department of Homeland Security, which, by the way, they had a leading hand in creating. They talked about the weakness of port security without outlining how that can be fixed. They failed to even discuss the problem of porous borders and immigration problems as they apply to possible terrorist activities. Beyond saying their party has a strong record on defense and in safeguarding the American people, which no one will dispute, they presented little else that would convince voters they have any more of an answer to the current situation than the Republicans.

In any event, they may not need to do much more than stay out of the line of fire if Republicans continue to blast away at each other and the White House over immigration and other issues. The president's naming of a new chief of staff was aimed, among other things, at calming his own forces on Capitol Hill. That's bureaucratic medicine that may be too little too late.

 

(Dan K. Thomasson is former editor of the Scripps Howard News Service.)


© Copyright 2006 by Capitol Hill Blue

Comments

They said nothing about whether rubberstamping might return should the next president be a member of their own party.

They shouldn't really have to. I don't have specific statistics so it is my impression, but I can't remember such overwhelming rubberstamping over the 40 years Dems controlled Congress when they were under a Dem president.

While I'm at it, it is amusing the Dems have to defend their tough-guy image. One aspect of Dem politicians that has always bothered me was the tendency to be hawkish, but I overlooked that as being something they knew more about than I and I liked most everything else about them.

Posted by spiiderweb at March 31, 2006 07:49 AM

If the American voters don't get it now about this most corrupt president and his minions, I really don't know what it would take to convince them.

Haven't we all had enough of one party rule?

Cathy
From the once great State of Michigan

Posted by Cathy at March 31, 2006 08:45 AM

Image, shmimage, let's dump 'business as usual', and start working on SOLVING some PROBLEMS. Problem-solving, it's a learned skill. That's where you take a given situation that is deemed 'bad', and you come up with a positive, pro-active plan to actually DO something to CHANGE it, rather than just bat the issue around like a cat with a mousie-toy. In short, it's called 'work'(gasp), an utterly foreign concept perhaps to the august bodies in both of our major parties, but be that as it may, the cause is just and the time is right for all good men...(yawn). We've seen This Movie before. JFK, in addition to declaring himself a jelly donut, also made mention of a sound principle, 'Ask not, what your country can do for you. Ask what YOU can do for your COUNTRY'. Mere words, but many thought of JFK as one of the more inspirational presidents we've ever had, up there with Reagan, and Roosevelt. Doing something for your country. It sounds a lot like 'work', but with more words. Actually, what Kennedy was really trying to say was 'get off your butts, you miserable parasitic slackers', but you can't say stuff like that on TV. Well, maybe now you can, but Bush hasn't even gotten to the same zip-code as verbally challenging people to do something about their own problems, for a change, and instead of embracing the traditional republican concepts as self-support, smaller government, and the general idea of having people do exactly what JFK described, instead we've seen the GOP-led Congress make a monster mess of things, run up a practically unpayable tab, and fly in the face of the stated principles of their own party at each and every available opportunity.

The author apparently expects some kind of miracle out of the minority
democrats, a hail-mary pass or something of equal status, a way to 'fix the republicans' bad', in some
fanciful form that has somehow escaped the 'end to big government and higher taxes' republicans.

I think that The Moral Of The Story is: grassroots initiatives have to start with people refusing the handout. Take yourself off the dole. Fix your OWN life, and when enough people are doing that, then the guys n gals clamoring for your vote will be adjusting their platforms to suit YOUR agenda, and not before. If people say 'hey, neither a lender nor a borrower be', start saving their money, and doing all the other common-sense things like curtailing their fuel use whenever possible, Congress will eventually sit up and take notice, democrat, republican, or otherwise.
Vox Populi, the literal voice of the majority, speaks louder than the most obnoxious, verbose, long-winded rhetoritician that you could possibly ever conceptualize. We, The People, need to become more vocal, and for one thing, request that more of these spending things, for example, get put forward for public approval instead of all just wrapped in one big ball and thrown at the public with the warning, 'catch!!!' LOL.
Congress overspends because 'we' let them overspend, by failing to protest grotesque budgets and general failures to uphold the public trust.
In other words, these guys are soooo fired, but it's false hope and complacency to assume that their replacements will indeed learn from their predecessors' mistakes. That's why an open public dialogue on the issues is so important, so as to give vent to grievances and forum for new ideas.

Congress ultimately listens to The People, but the people have to speak clearly in a unified voice for change, and may end up repeating themselves. Eventually, though, the 'good' will get through,
but it's got to start with basics, like public accountability. People have to have the will to recall representatives if they fail to meet that standard, if they don't consult at least periodically with the voting public, if they don't at least TRY to adhere to some common-sense basic principles even in the face of monetary temptation.
Let business be business, and let Congress be Congress, I say, and never the twain shall meet save in the face of a breach of law.
The buying of influence is a story that is second only in its' gravity to that of the Iraq war, and I think the fact that Congress hasn't stood up yet as a Body and declared for a national fuel conservation effort speaks VOLUMES about the whole insane clown posse.
Reform isn't hard. It just takes some honesty, some hard work, and some of that good old common sense, which we're told is neither, but I beg to differ, I believe that, for example, an energy-independent nation can't help but eventually prosper, and if we don't start thinking along those general lines, national bankruptcy awaits us. Won't be any 'benefits' to live off of, then...remember to vote in November!

Posted by Bert at April 14, 2006 06:22 PM

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated and will not be posted if they contain insults, flaming of other posters, profanity or libelous comments. Comments that are off topic will be deleted. Thanks for waiting.)


Top of Page

RECENT STORIES

Sign up for our Daily Newsletter mailing list!