News Categories



Capitol Hill Blue is a not-for-profit, non-commercial experiment in on-line journalism published as an information resource for our readers. All material is © 2006 Capitol Hill Blue. For more information, please check out our FAQ. We take your privacy seriously at Capitol Hill Blue.
CHB Home / Half-Shell Home/ Print This Page / Email this page

DeLay an easy winner in Texas GOP primary

March 8, 2006 01:58 AM / Capitol Hillbillies .
Scandal-scarred U.S. Rep. Tom DeLay won handily in the Republican primary for his congressional seat on Tuesday, taking 61 percent of the votes against three opponents.

The race had been seen as a barometer of his political strength since he resigned as House majority leader following indictment in Texas on campaign finance charges and his friendlobbyist Jack Abramoff was indicted in a Washington corruption scandal.

DeLay skipped his election night party to attend a fund-raiser in Washington put on by lobbyists.

With 86 percent of the votes counted, DeLay led his closest opponent Tom Campbell by 61 percent to 30 percent. In a statement, DeLay said voters in his Houston area district had rejected the "politics of personal destruction" to support him.

It was the first time since he joined Congress 22 years ago that DeLay has had serious opposition in the primary.

He will face Democrat Nick Lampson, who was unopposed in his party's primary, in the November general election.

Lampson is a former U.S. representative who lost re-election after his district was changed to favor Republicans in a controversial 2003 remapping of Texas congressional districts led by DeLay.

Also, Chris Bell, another former congressman who lost his seat after the DeLay redistricting, won the Democratic gubernatorial nomination and will face incumbent Republican Gov. Rick Perry in November.

They may be joined in the race by independent candidates State Comptroller Carole Keeton Rylander and musician Kinky Friedman, who, with the primaries over, now can begin petition drives to get on the ballot. They have two months to get 45,500 signatures each.


© Copyright 2006 by Capitol Hill Blue

Comments

If I had been a Democrat in his district,
which I am not, I would have voted to Tom Delay (you dod not register in Texas) since
he is the easiest to defeat

Posted by Gregor Riesser, PhD at March 8, 2006 09:24 AM


Ah, Texas, my Texas.

Even though I'm from Texas, own land there, and had family there since around the time of the Revolution...I say let's give it back to whomever.

If Mexico won't take it then let's insist that Spain reclaim it.

The grand old tradition of ignorant dirt farmers who struck oil on their property and became even more ignorant political forces...and then were allowed to breed and propagate even more ignorance should be surgically removed from the rest of the country.

Posted by Wedjat at March 8, 2006 10:13 AM

Yup, it's clear that those Texas voters are scum just like their representative.

Posted by Doubtom at March 8, 2006 10:14 AM

How ironic that he skipped his victory party to attend a lobyist fundraiser.

Posted by Al Moore at March 8, 2006 10:30 AM

If three others ran against Tom DeLay, that should have helped him win the primary. How those Texans can vote for such a dishonest man is beyond me. But he feeds the same lies as the White House just to become a congressman.
Maybe it is time to get out of this God forsaken country.

Posted by Topsy at March 8, 2006 10:36 AM

But... in listening to a Houston news radio station from my home in South Florida, it was mentioned that only (aprox) 16% of voters bothered showing up for the primary elections...Too bad the 84% of the populace that he's P O'd didn't bother to show up...Oh well, business as usual. db

Posted by mrdavee at March 8, 2006 11:54 AM

If I had been a Democrat in DeLay's district
I would have voted for DeLay, since
he is easy to defeat

Posted by Gregor Riesser, PhD at March 8, 2006 12:32 PM

No one in Texas expected Tom DeLay to lose in the Republican Primary. The real test will be when he runs in November.

Posted by Peter Stern at March 8, 2006 12:57 PM

I love this quote from the story:
'DeLay said voters in his Houston area district had rejected the "politics of personal destruction" to support him.'

Seems like the voters that supported him ARE supporting the politics of personal destruction. Isn't that Tom "Hammer" DeLay's major tactic against his opposition?

Frankly, folks, all this ballyhoo about a worthless primary is misplaced. The midterm elections in November are the critical event this year.

Get out the anti-Republican vote!

Posted by Jerry at March 8, 2006 03:42 PM

I'm a Dem (and not in his district), but I was "heartsick" that he won. I had hoped the Repugs would have at least "ousted" him. But, I'm dreaming and expecting Repugs to be "moral." I just hope that when the "final" election comes, that Texans (fair-minded ones)will prevail and that DeLay will experience his demise.

Posted by Carol Purner at March 8, 2006 08:00 PM

What is wrong with these people in Texas???

Is winning an election more important than integrity, honesty and real democracy? We are not talking about some damn Texas high school football game here. Sheesh!

If they are that blind and foolish, I wish they would secede from the Union - again!!!

Posted by Stephen Kriz at March 8, 2006 08:28 PM

Let,s see where the most corrupt politicans come from could that be Texas? I guess just because a proscuter says he's corrupt doesn't hold water there . So how many family members voted in the race? and how many times? did anybody count the ballots?

Posted by James Hackbarth at March 9, 2006 05:51 PM

What voting machines were used? Therein may lie your answer.

Posted by cassie at March 9, 2006 08:58 PM

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated and will not be posted if they contain insults, flaming of other posters, profanity or libelous comments. Comments that are off topic will be deleted. Thanks for waiting.)


Top of Page

RECENT STORIES

Sign up for our Daily Newsletter mailing list!