News Categories



Capitol Hill Blue is a not-for-profit, non-commercial experiment in on-line journalism published as an information resource for our readers. All material is © 2006 Capitol Hill Blue. For more information, please check out our FAQ. We take your privacy seriously at Capitol Hill Blue.
CHB Home / Half-Shell Home/ Print This Page / Email this page

Bush wants even more power

March 6, 2006 06:36 AM / Bush Leagues .
President George W. Bush will soon make a formal request to Congress for a line-item veto -- authority that would give him power to cancel specific spending items in budget bills, an administration official said on Sunday.

Many presidents have sought such authority on the argument it would help cut down on wasteful spending in the budget. In a rare yielding of some of its powers of the purse strings, Congress passed legislation granting a line-item veto to President Bill Clinton.

The Supreme Court struck down the law in 1998, ruling by a vote of 6-3 that Congress did not have the authority under the Constitution to give the president that power.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he did not wish to be seen as pre-empting the president's announcement, said that Bush would transmit to Congress a proposal with language aimed at withstanding a Supreme Court challenge.

Bush plans to announce his intention to draw up a proposal on the line-item veto on Monday morning during a ceremony to swear in the new chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, Edward Lazear, the official said.

Bush, who has never vetoed a spending bill, has been criticized by many conservatives for the surge in federal expenditures on his watch. Republicans worry the record deficits could hurt them in this year's midterm elections in which Democrats are seeking to regain control of one or both houses of Congress.

The Bush administration has forecast a fiscal 2007 budget deficit of $439 billion, an all-time high.

The lobbying scandal involving Jack Abramoff and the conviction of former California Republican Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham on bribery charges have put a spotlight on budget earmarks -- targeted spending items often added to unrelated spending bills.

Bush called in his State of the Union address for a line-item veto but did not offer specifics. He has also said he wants to see Congress put limits on earmarks.


© Copyright 2006 by Capitol Hill Blue

Comments

Bush gets what he wants and that cannot be argued. All the Republicans, plus most of the Democrats, just roll over for this "idiot". Why? I dont know the answer, but I know the outcome, the results are facing us today.

Posted by Jim at March 6, 2006 07:13 AM

Jim: This is just an educated guess, but I have a hunch that it has to do with the NSA spying. I'm guessing that he either has stuff on a lot of these guys and gals to blackmail them with, and/or he is coercing them, and/or threatning them or their loved ones.

Posted by carol at March 6, 2006 09:33 AM

They're all scared, man.......scared of the grim reaper and torture-congress and all are scared.All people must stand together at the same time man.....or one person can't make a diffeence...

Posted by rat packer at March 6, 2006 09:39 AM

The Line Item Veto is a fraud. Many state governors have it. They have not used it to reduce spending.

The Line Item Veto is simply a device to give the President more power and to weaken Congress. The President would use the Line Item Veto to "Punish" any Senator or Congressman who voted in a manner Bush didn't like by crossing out any items which benefit the Senator's state or Congressman's district.

What else would you expect from George Bush? Stop messing with the Constitution!

Posted by A Radical Whig at March 6, 2006 09:48 AM

Bush is claiming unlimited power in the "national emergency." He expects the new Supreme Court to back him up on this. Nobody knows what to expect--but some of us expect the worst. Billdab

Posted by Bill Barger at March 6, 2006 11:10 AM

NO! No Line Item Veto for Bush. He has done enough DAMAGE to the US,And how can we STOP the Port Deal with Untied Arab Emirates. Gerald Winningham

Posted by Gerald Winningham at March 6, 2006 02:37 PM

What should happen is Congress should line item that stupid asshole, veto his dick Chaney, and recall that defenseless Rumpshit. what we should do is melt Snow and maybe the deficit ceiling request would be denied. this is one totally sickening administration. they remind me of vomit, from time to time everyone does, and no one likes what comes out. i just wonder if those that selected him in the first time and voted this bastard in the second time are trying to jump parties? impeach every bastard republican now holding a seat in congress and the white house, and not only that, impeach everyone of the stupid sick ass loud mouth and no action democrats that voted for the patriot act. i think the ten that voted against the renewal of the patriot act is a good number to start with in a brand new administration. shit we need park rangers to guard the congress and the white house, these fucking park apes are jumping from branch to branch and out of control!

Posted by Manuel at March 6, 2006 03:42 PM

Bush uses the claim of a 'national emergency' to rationalize his power grab and breaking of laws. Why doesn't Congress just declare an end of national emergency and put the issue to rest?

Posted by ACF at March 6, 2006 05:17 PM

Bush uses the claim of a 'national emergency' to rationalize his power grab and breaking of laws. Why doesn't Congress just declare an end of national emergency and put the issue to rest?

Posted by beantownliberal at March 6, 2006 05:18 PM

I am far from being a liberal (I'm about as conservative as you can get--but not a neo-con), and I wonder how professing Christians can continue to support this joker!

My former pastor didn't like it when I flat-out told him "Bush is an evil man." That's where he started a tirade about liberals.

Wasn't he listening?

Posted by Alexandra at March 6, 2006 09:09 PM

Somebody should try to find any sound bites and articles written by Republicans during the Supreme Court's review of Clinton's line-item veto power.

Back then I remember a lot of loud complaints regarding how unConstitutional the whole idea is, how much it runs roughshod over the minority position in Congress, and how much power it concentrates in the hands of one man, and all coming from Republicans.

Posted by Jerry at March 7, 2006 05:31 PM

The White House has become 'THE DEN OF INIQUITY' full of liars, theives and cowards!!!

Posted by Mary at March 7, 2006 11:30 PM

Each President has asked for "Line item veto". For eight years, I heard Clinton ask for it. But I do agree that every good thing can be abused, On the other hand, MOST of the Congress needs their hands SLAPPED. [PORK BARREL SPENDING]
Remember, Congress controls the Money and NO longer has to Vote themselves a pay raise. They have to vote against automatic pay raises which they do NOT do.

Posted by Jonathan E. Wilhelm at March 8, 2006 06:44 AM

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated and will not be posted if they contain insults, flaming of other posters, profanity or libelous comments. Comments that are off topic will be deleted. Thanks for waiting.)


Top of Page

RECENT STORIES

Sign up for our Daily Newsletter mailing list!