AP sues to open up court records
March 6, 2006 09:24 PM /
FUBAR
.
The Associated Press sued the Justice Department on Monday for access to American-born Taliban soldier John Walker Lindh's petitions to have his 20-year federal prison sentence shortened.
The federal Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in New York, said the government has improperly refused to turn over Lindh's pleas to have his sentence reduced on the grounds that doing so would be an unwarranted invasion of his privacy.
AP's lawyers, in letters to the Justice Department and the lawsuit, however, said Lindh "is a 'high-profile public figure' whose 'privacy interest in his petition is low to nonexistent.'"
Lindh's lawyer, James Brosnahan, also has told the news cooperative that he would have turned over the documents himself, but he can't under the terms of Lindh's imprisonment.
The Justice Department did not immediately comment on the lawsuit.
Lindh, 25, was captured in Afghanistan in November 2001 in the U.S.-led effort to topple the Taliban following the Sept. 11 attacks.
Prosecutors charged him with conspiring to kill Americans and supporting terrorists. He pleaded guilty to lesser offenses in 2002, including carrying weapons against U.S. forces. He avoided a potential life sentence and agreed to withdraw claims that he had been abused or tortured in U.S. custody.
The AP said it believes Lindh "contends in his petition that he was prosecuted and convicted unfairly in the immediate wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks, and that he was not, in fact, knowingly fighting the United States in Afghanistan."
The president decides whether to commute sentences or pardon people who have been convicted of crimes and have completed their sentences, usually on the recommendation of the department's Pardon Attorney.
Lindh, who is held at the medium security federal penitentiary in Victorville, Calif., first applied for clemency in September 2004, following up on his request 15 months later. Justice officials told him it would be at least a year before any decision is made.
AP first sought the records on Jan. 4. Nine days later, the department replied it could only release the documents with Lindh's written consent, according to the lawsuit. But Lindh is barred from making any public comment on the matter, including consenting to the release, under the terms of his plea agreement, the suit said.
A similar privacy issue is at the center of a long dispute between AP and the government over access to information about detainees at the U.S. military facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. U.S. District Judge Jed S. Rakoff last month ordered the Pentagon to release the identities of hundreds of detainees.
___
On the Net:
Justice Department: http://www.usdoj.gov
© 2006 The Associated Press
© Copyright
2006 by Capitol Hill Blue
Comments
"AP first sought the records on Jan. 4. Nine days later, the department replied it could only release the documents with Lindh's written consent, according to the lawsuit. But Lindh is barred from making any public comment on the matter, including consenting to the release, under the terms of his plea agreement, the suit said."
This looks a lot like the situation Doug wrote about just this morning regarding the undisclosed document that was delivered to a person who can not be named. That is: The documents can only be released via Lindh's written consent--but Lindh is barred from making any public comment on the matter??? Either this is a circular kind of double-speak or I'm missing something important. Oh, my brain hurts!
Posted by brookela at March 7, 2006 11:44 AM
When do we get subjected to the TV movie about the "Johnny Walker Story"?
I think the public is ready to hear his side of the events that landed him where he is.
Posted by
bob at March 7, 2006 11:57 AM
I honestly believe if the American people knew the actual John Lindh story public sentiment would urge his sentence be reduced or he be pardoned.
Posted by Nosakhere at March 7, 2006 03:16 PM
I'd love to hear this kids story. If it is true he took up arms against his country and there are no mitigating circumstances(his involvement was only being a stupid kid searching for himself and getting caught up in something he had not intended to be involved in), I for one (Disabled 100%SC veteran from Vietnam era war)would like to know.If it is true,he knowingly and willfully took up arms against his countrymen. I for one see no problem in letting him stay in prison for the rest of his life. On the other hand if as I stated "it was only a stupid youthfull mistake and the kid got caught caught up in something this huge and there is more to the story than we are being told" let the truth be known. I for one believe his parents deserve to be scrutinized and if this is just a ploy for lienincy. Well I supose the CIA officer,Mike Mann's(I sure hope I'm remembering correctlly)wife and parents would see differently. I would like for this kid and his parents to listen to the CIA officer's family. Hear thier dreams for a young kid from Sulligent Alabama.To hear thier views of raising a kid and not making excuses for failed parenting.After hearing this kids story ,the final dicision should be upto the parents of Mike Mann.
Posted by john m. burton at March 9, 2006 09:27 AM
Top of
Page