News Categories



Capitol Hill Blue is a not-for-profit, non-commercial experiment in on-line journalism published as an information resource for our readers. All material is © 2006 Capitol Hill Blue. For more information, please check out our FAQ. We take your privacy seriously at Capitol Hill Blue.
CHB Home / Half-Shell Home/ Print This Page / Email this page

Americans fear government is too secretive

March 9, 2006 04:41 AM / Bush Leagues .
By THOMAS HARGROVE and GUIDO H. STEMPEL III

Most Americans think the federal government operates with "too much secrecy" and overwhelmingly believe that public access to official records is critical to democracy, according to a Scripps Howard News Service poll.

First Amendment advocates hailed the findings of the survey of 1,007 adult residents of the United States conducted at the request of the American Society of Newspaper Editors as part of its observance of National Sunshine Week, which starts Sunday.

"People clearly think that their federal government is more secretive than state or local governments. And they are probably right," said Lucy Dalglish, executive director of the Arlington, Va.-based Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press. "It has become more difficult to get information out of the federal government."

Andy Alexander, chairman of the newspaper editors' Freedom of Information Committee, said the survey confirms that people believe their national government is excessively secretive.

"We commissioned the survey so that we could show, scientifically, what we know anecdotally -- citizens want the federal government to be more open and transparent," said Alexander, Washington bureau chief of Cox Newspapers.

The survey, conducted by the Scripps Survey Research Center at Ohio University, found that 59 percent of Americans believe the national government has "too much secrecy." Forty-five percent were as critical of the level of secrecy in their state and local governments.

The findings come at a time when news organizations are challenging hundreds of federal secrets, such as the identities of 500 prison detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, or records in the investigation of CIA agent Valerie Plame's leaked identity.

Former Attorney General John Ashcroft set a new tone for federal secrecy when, shortly after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, he issued a memo promising to defend federal officials for deciding "to withhold records, in whole or in part" from the public.

"Right now, all of the incentive is for classifying information," said Lee Hamilton, a former member of the 9/11 commission and president of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. "You might say the motto is: 'When in doubt, classify.' "

In the poll, 86 percent said they are "very interested" or "somewhat interested" in the "actions and activities" of state and local government, while 88 percent expressed similar interest in the federal government. Fifty-two percent said they are "very interested" in federal activities compared to 38 percent expressing the highest level of interest in local and state government.

"Americans are intensely interested in what goes on at all levels of government," Alexander said. "Public officials should take note of that. Citizens want to know more about their government, and they clearly do not want more secrecy."

ASNE is spearheading Sunshine Week, in which various news organizations and civic groups seek to raise public awareness of the importance of open government.

The survey asked: "Do you believe that public access to government records is critical to the functioning of good government, or do you believe that it plays only a minor role?" Sixty-two percent said records access is critical, 25 percent said it has a minor role, and 13 percent were undecided or gave other responses.

Respondents were also asked to rate whether various governments are "open and transparent" or "closed and secretive." Only 10 percent thought that state and local governments tend to be "very secretive" and 30 percent said these governments can be "somewhat secretive." Overall, 55 percent said they think these governments are open to public scrutiny.

But the federal government is regarded with greater suspicion. Only 33 percent said Uncle Sam is "very open" or "somewhat open," while 40 percent said it is "somewhat secretive" and 22 percent said it is "very secretive." In both questions, 5 percent were undecided or gave a different response.

There is almost no opposition to so-called "sunshine" or "freedom-of-information" laws that guarantee public access to government records, official meetings and court records. Only about one person in 20 complained that these laws provide "too much access."

About half of the people polled said freedom-of-information legislation gives the public "the right amount of access" to official information, while more than a quarter complained the laws give them "too little access" to public records. About one in six people didn't know enough about sunshine laws to have an opinion.

The poll found that Americans are divided when asked to select the legal standard to determine when information should be released.

Forty-six percent agreed with the statement: "Government records should be considered public and that information should be withheld only if a government agency can show that release of the information would do harm."

But 42 percent agreed with the statement: "It is the responsibility of the government to protect the information it holds and that records should be made public only if the citizen can make a sound legal case for its release."

Twelve percent were undecided.

People who depend on newspapers _ rather than television or other sources_ to tell them about government activities tend to be more insistent that records be made public and to be more critical of government secrecy. Sixty-two percent of people who rely on newspapers said they believe the federal government is too secretive.

The poll also found that Americans rarely interact with their government and infrequently seek records. Among the findings:

  • 37 percent have attended a meeting or hearing of their local government.
  • 15 percent have attended a state hearing or meeting.
  • 8 percent have gone to a federal hearing or meeting.
  • 12 percent have sought records from City Hall or other local agencies.
  • 8 percent have asked for state records.
  • 6 percent has sought federal records.

Generally, Americans report they found government officials, at all levels, to be either "very helpful" or "somewhat helpful" when they've sought records.

The survey was conducted nationwide by telephone from Feb. 19 to March 3 at Ohio University under a grant from the Scripps Howard Foundation. It has a margin of error of 4 percentage points.

 

(Thomas Hargrove is a reporter for Scripps Howard News Service. Guido H. Stempel III is the director of the Scripps Survey Research Center at Ohio University.)


© Copyright 2006 by Capitol Hill Blue

Comments

Let us take a look at what government has done to us since 9/11. They moniter our every move by video surveilance. They want us to take up new styles of ID and register our DNA. These .....People..... want to inspect every part of our person, but yet. They allow tons of stuff to come into our country. Uncontrolled ?
5% of all containers that enter America. Are inspected. Now ask youself? If Terrorists with Bombs are a severe national security threat to Americans. Would'nt the prudent course of action be to detect these kinds of actions at their sources of entry? Yet this government Body has FAILED to do this. This Government Body has FAILED to protect our Borders in every possible manner known. But they continue to take our rights away?
I have an Idea. Let's Demand of them what they demand of Us. Let's hook them up to 24 Hour surveilance so we can actually see what they say and do while on & Off the Job. So we donot have to worry about government secrecy anymore. Then we can save tons of tax payer dollars on Investigations of corruption. WELL? It would be the Prudent thing to do wouldn't? For a people that want more openess of their government?
Yep! I like my Idea. Even if it is a little simplistic! ; o )

Posted by Decoymaker at March 9, 2006 09:17 AM

LOL...they cry about this stuff, yet they keep reelecting the very people who allow the evilness to continue.

Time to wake up America...if not, your opinions may not matter anymore (if it ever did).

Posted by byronebyronian at March 9, 2006 01:28 PM

Goes hand-in-hand with what oughta' be a patent reply to Rep. Senslessbrenner's statement that the USA PA hasn't been used to violate anyone's rights."

"Mr. Sensenbrenner, How would we know if it HAD!!"

I guess that we should just take their word for it. Afterall, just 'cause the FISA court and the Inspector General of the DoJ have BOTH disclosed significant numbers of cases where the FBI, et al, have broken the law, misrepresented facts, and lied, doesn't mean that we can't trust them does it?? ;^>)

Posted by Dirk at March 9, 2006 02:20 PM

Can anyone recall the first shot fired to slowly take away the freedoms and liberties from the American people????? Can anyone recall where they were and what they were busy doing on that fateful day on 12 December 2000????

Let me refresh everyone’s memory, well, this was the day the Supreme Court (SC) mysteriously sided (5-4) with the GW BUSH Crime Family to stop the "Florida Recount" and just nonchalantly inserted Bush in to the W.H. as all knowing dictator "KING GEORGE". The SC said their decision to hand Bush the Presidency was a
on-time affair; never to be used again.

Now of course for the SC to arrive at their bias unconstitutional decision, the SC had to ignore the decision handed down by the FLA. Supreme Court. The FLA. SC ruled to allow the recount to continue until all votes were counted. So you ask yourself what’s wrong with counting all votes. What's wrong with the will of the American people in regards to one man - one vote? After all it's the American way right??

Let’s recap what has transpired since the Supreme Court selected Bush to ruin this country:

The rich and powerful crooks who run this country hates the constitution and “We the People”; and they seek our total submission and obedience. REMEMBER BUSH said you are either with him or against him.

For those reporters who dare speak the truth or for gov’t whistle blowers who attempt to speak the truth. Bush views these true patriots as terrorist (who are against him) and wants them prosecuted under the Patriot Act. Now remember the Patriot Act was passed to protect America against another terrorist attack; right? Bush plans to use the Patriot Act on all Americans’ who dare questions his dictatorial rule!!!!! Bush will sign into law this week making the Patriot Act permanent!

Just remember historians have always questioned the German people after Hitler took power in Germany "How could they allow such a monster to come to power and eventually take your country over the Clift"

The German people's reply was simple; "By the time they realized just how evil and dangerous Hitler was, it was too late fore they knew that Hitler and the Nazi party controlled their congress, Military, the Judicial System and the Chancellery. "GAME OVER". The German people could only watch as the mad man took their country over the abyss.

AMERICA DOES THAT SOUND FAMILIAR!!!!! YOU MUST ASK YOURSSELF CAN HISTORY REPEAT ITSELF.

Is Bush the new Hitler of the 21st Century?? The similarities are there you must admit there is no denying that the Bush Admin. and the NeoCons are using the Hitler play book to consolidate their power.

NEVER SAY NEVER. For those of us who choose to ignore history or who are ignorant of historical facts, tend to allow history to repeat itself.

WAKE UP AMERICA! Bush & Cheney must be impeached and thrown out of office as soon as possible.

Posted by Npba900 at March 9, 2006 03:31 PM

Just read that government is buying up all the MRE's and 7.62x39 ammo in the country- Called Larrys Gun Shop in Mobile and told them what I was reading. They confirmed that was true- they had NONE! They also told me that WALMART just stopped selling guns in Mobile, Alabama. Smells like a plan to me. Get what you need now,Folks.
Welcome to the America none of ever thought we'd see. Invest is a little gold, a little silver, and a lot of lead.

Posted by William Borgstrom at March 9, 2006 03:33 PM

William B:

First off, Wal Mart is not selling guns in areas affected by Katrina. They are also getting out of the gun business due to fear of liability and the red tape involved.

As for the ammo, did you ever think that maybe theres a shortage due to the Iraq war? I am not razzing you, I just tire of the talk that almost sounds like the militias when they cried of Black Helicopters watching their every move.

Sure, our guvmint is corrupt and is not working in our best interests, but what you describe is more of a symptom of the marketplace than a guvmint gone amuck.

Posted by byronebyronian at March 9, 2006 06:02 PM

byronebyronian,

Your analysis would make much more sense if our government has any significant use for the 7.62x39 cartridge. Our troops (with the exception of some elite groups wo are permitted to 'select' their weaponry of choice, just as some were in S.E. Asia many moons ago), use 5.56mm/aka .223.

There are uses for the 7.62x39 in Iraq, but only for the AKs that were purchased, ironically, from Norinco, by the Bush Admin. But(!!) if Shrub was able to buy the AKs from a Chinese-based manufacturer,(albeit one who was convicted in this country for bringing in entire container cars full of unregistered, class III selective-fire copies of SKSs) then why wouldn't they also be purchasing that ammo from the same sources; military ball ammo (ie., vest-piercing steel core) hasn't been commercially available in this country since the early mid-90s. But China, the Slovakian countries, and Germany are waist-deep in the stuff.

in other words, our boys don't commonly use the 7.62x39, and the Iraqis for whom we just bought all of those nice shiny AKs probably desire (no, NEED!) combat-grade ammo, which is MORE than available for very cheap prices over-seas.... but not here in your local sporting goods store.

Next hypothesis....

Posted by Dirk at March 9, 2006 08:15 PM

John ashcroft credability is about as good as rush limbaugh both are completely lost it,there insane need to be locked up for good some day they will be,an all there croonies I cant wait till that day. we need to get out of war now !!! An stay away from all other countries Its there business what they do I dont give a dam what they do We need to stay here an just be on guard for attacks against all large corporations rothchilds an all top crooks thats ruined this country.Queen king

Posted by Michael at March 12, 2006 10:03 AM

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated and will not be posted if they contain insults, flaming of other posters, profanity or libelous comments. Comments that are off topic will be deleted. Thanks for waiting.)


Top of Page

RECENT STORIES

Sign up for our Daily Newsletter mailing list!