News Categories



Capitol Hill Blue is a not-for-profit, non-commercial experiment in on-line journalism published as an information resource for our readers. All material is © 2006 Capitol Hill Blue. For more information, please check out our FAQ. We take your privacy seriously at Capitol Hill Blue.
CHB Home / Half-Shell Home/ Print This Page / Email this page

The blame game: Lots of hype, no results

February 14, 2006 06:08 AM / Capitol Hillbillies .

By DAN K. THOMASSON

As always, Congress is focusing on the sins of the past and not the present.

From that standpoint, the current investigations into the Katrina disaster are a familiar repeat of the blame game that can serve little useful purpose because the chances are good the errors will be repeated.

Who cares whether the White House knew on Monday or a day later that the New Orleans dam had burst? Should the president have dispatched someone to put his finger in the dike? Perhaps he should have really shown compassion by doing so himself. A lot of his enemies would have loved that. The fact is irrefutable that it was too late by the time anyone, including those in the path of the flood, knew it was happening.

Anyone who wasn't in a coma _ or maybe in Congress _ at the time of this disaster knows by now why it occurred. It is the result of decades of talking about a potential problem, of diverting funds to other projects and believing that the inevitable will never happen. It is sort of like the fellow who fell from the 10-story building and, as he passed every floor, was heard to say, "Well, so far so good." The litany of mistakes will be flooding forth all over Capitol Hill soon.

So here we are, almost six months afterward, wasting time and money looking backward at the obvious rather than addressing the fact that huge parts of what used to be the most intriguing city in America still look like the hurricane and flood hit just yesterday. Here we are with the fired FEMA director, Michael Brown, the onetime Arabian horse breeder and official Katrina scapegoat, talking about how he called this White House aide or that in the early hours and got no response, while thousands of displaced persons are still strewn across the South and elsewhere like flotsam.

Where has all the money gone? You know, the billions and billions pledged from private and government sources. Where are the thousands of trailers to provide temporary housing while the permanent homes are being rebuilt? Where are the bulldozers, carpenters, electricians, plumbers and others necessary to put right the blighted neighborhoods the president promised would be flowering again in no time? Those are the questions Congress needs to be asking _ not who called whom in Crawford, Texas, when nature's mighty force was kicking the stuffing out of the Gulf Coast.

It is the nature of Congress that it always refuses to accept any blame, ignoring the fact that the lack of preparedness and slow response to Katrina stemmed largely from its own panic-stricken actions. Everyone told lawmakers, even in the atmosphere of 9/11, that the Department of Homeland Security was a mistake of giant proportions; that it was a blueprint for a dysfunctional agency. Need we look any farther than the Ninth Ward of New Orleans for proof of that? This unwieldy blunderbuss would test the managerial skills of Gen. George Marshall, a logistical genius, let alone one of far lesser stature like Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, who probably should resign in the wake of disclosures that his level of incompetence was the same as Brown's.

The truly scary thought is what happens in the case of a nuclear explosion or detonation of a radiological "dirty" bomb? Brown said that everything in Homeland Security, including his former agency, has been aimed at responding to or heading off a possible terrorist attack, not a natural disaster. What is the difference? If you can't respond properly to one, chances are you can't to the other.

That leaves us with some horrendous prospects. Try evacuating this city and its environs on a moment's notice, let alone the behemoths of New York or Chicago or Los Angeles. Americans should be demanding to know whether their government can protect them from a repeat of the current chaos or whether they should begin building those silly shelters of the '50s and stocking up on supplies.

In the meantime, Congress, as it approaches its midterm elections, will go on looking backward and trying for political gain by fixing blame while the good folks of the Gulf, particularly the poor ones of New Orleans, face another rapidly approaching hurricane season while still trying to recover from the last.

(Dan K. Thomasson is former editor of the Scripps Howard News Service.)


© Copyright 2006 by Capitol Hill Blue

Comments

"Brown said that everything in Homeland Security, including his former agency, has been aimed at responding to or heading off a possible terrorist attack, not a natural disaster. What is the difference? If you can't respond properly to one, chances are you can't to the other."

-The difference is that natural disasters affect far more people and property per average year than terrorist attacks. In other words, it is more important to respond well to a natural disaster, because the odds are far larger that:
1) You'll have them in any given length of time.
2) They'll affect more people in any given length of time.
3) More of the people will be rescuable hours or days later.
4) You can reasonably predict what may happen, with what likelihood, and what defenses will work (given a hard target, terrorists can change their plans.)

Posted by Zimbel at February 14, 2006 10:48 AM

Mother Nature handed the Democrats their best chance to take back all those Red states in the South, and yet they'd rather be the punching bag for the GOP on issues like spying and torture.

Hurricanes Katrina and Rita have displaced over a million people, rich and poor, throughout the United States, but mostly in the South, placing tremendous burdens on the infrastructure of the cities and towns that now house them. Two of the most red Red States, Alabama and Mississippi, were practically blown off the map. And yet, less than five months after the country's most destructive natural disaster, the President makes mention of it in two sentences at the end of his State of the Union speech! This is an outrage!

More outrageous is the total lack of focus on this issue by the Democratic Party. You've got a million homeless people roaming the country, they're angry, and they'll back whoever pays them just the littlest bit of attention.

And yet the Democrats continue to play the part of the tomato can, being the weak-on-defense foils for the Chickenhawk's waving the flag of patriotism.

What exactly does the Democratic Party stand for if not to help the downtrodden? The GOP Congress and the White House have made clear that they have no intention of addressing the human catostrophe that continues to this day in the South. Had Governor Kaine -- the Democratic standard bearer these days -- focused his response to the President's State of the Union on the national disgrace that continues to this day in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, maybe what he said rather than what his eyebrow did would have made the news.

The upcoming mid-term elections are hardly in the bag for Democrats, particularly when they don't seem to stand for anything. Mother Nature gave them an issue; and they won't get another dollar from me until I hear them heed its call.

Posted by Andrew McGuire at February 14, 2006 11:29 AM

To get skilled labor(Re-Build) to come down to The Big Easy
You hafta' pay them right, provide them with a suitable place to live. They do neither.

Posted by Paulzee at February 14, 2006 11:35 AM

>The upcoming mid-term elections are hardly in the
>bag for Democrats, particularly when they don't
>seem to stand for anything.

The Democrats will lose even more power this fall, directly due to the astoundingly weak Senate "leadership" of Harry Reid. This guy helped torpedo Paul Hackett's run before it ever got off the ground.

Posted by Beast of Bourbon at February 14, 2006 01:11 PM

I really think the important issue is what were the administration doing while people were hungry, without water and dieing in NO. They were on vacation. bush strumbed while NO flooded. Sorta like Nero when Rome burned. People were begging for help.....This is not about blame this is a fact that w. didn't care enough about the people is says he wants to protect by spying on them to give up his vacation. JUst like he didn't give up his vacation after he learned in 2001 that we might get attacted. People are dieing because george w. cares more about his vacation then the people who elected him. THe fact that billions have been spent and these poor people suffer is a crime. George w. the crimes just keep coming and the republicans keep protecting.

Posted by rebecca Bank at February 14, 2006 08:44 PM

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated and will not be posted if they contain insults, flaming of other posters, profanity or libelous comments. Comments that are off topic will be deleted. Thanks for waiting.)


Top of Page

RECENT STORIES

Sign up for our Daily Newsletter mailing list!