News Categories



Capitol Hill Blue is a not-for-profit, non-commercial experiment in on-line journalism published as an information resource for our readers. All material is © 2006 Capitol Hill Blue. For more information, please check out our FAQ. We take your privacy seriously at Capitol Hill Blue.
CHB Home / Half-Shell Home/ Print This Page / Email this page

Roberts waffles on domestic spying

February 18, 2006 05:36 PM / Capitol Hillbillies .
The chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, breaking ranks with the president on domestic eavesdropping, says he wants a special court to oversee the program.

But less than a day later, a top aide to Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., sought to clarify his position.

Roberts told The New York Times that he is concerned that the secret court established by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act could not issue warrants as quickly as the monitoring program requires. But he is optimistic that the problem could be worked out.

"You don't want to have a situation where you have capability that doesn't work well with the FISA court, in terms of speed and agility and hot pursuit," Roberts said Friday.

While he didn't know how such a process would work, Roberts also said the much-discussed National Security Agency program "should come before the FISA court."

Roberts was not available on Saturday. The Senate Intelligence Committee's majority staff director, Bill Duhnke, said the Times story did not reflect "the tenor and status" of the negotiations between Congress and the White House, as well as within Congress.

Duhnke said Roberts is looking at changes within the federal law but not necessarily involving the approval of the court.

"The senator remains open to a number of legislative and oversight options," Duhnke said Saturday. "His preference is always that the entire (intelligence) committee be briefed and involved in oversight issues. He also realizes that, as you negotiate between the branches, that isn't always possible."

Duhnke said Roberts hopes that during this negotiation process that all sides can be accommodated.

Roberts told the Times that he does not believe much support exists among lawmakers for exempting the program from the control of the FISA court. That is the approach Bush has favored and one that would be established under a bill proposed by Sen. Mike DeWine, R-Ohio.

White House officials have said their bar for agreeing to any legislative changes would be high. They have signaled they are open only to legislation that would "further codify" in law the authority the president insists he already has without Congress' approval, something officials believe would be accomplished with DeWine's proposal.

Bush also has been cool to expansive debate about the program, saying Friday that the discussion going on now is "too bad, because guess who listens to the discussion? The enemy."

Roberts has defended Bush's program, which was revealed by the Times in a story in December. Bush says the program to monitor electronic communication between the United States and international sites involving suspected al-Qaida operatives is vital to anti-terrorism efforts.

On Thursday, Roberts said he and the White House had agreed to give lawmakers more information on the nature of the program and that the administration had committed to making changes to the FISA law. At the same time, he delayed a Democratic effort to call for an investigation of the program.


© Copyright 2006 by Capitol Hill Blue

Comments

Note to Senator Roberts:

We already have a special court overseeing the program. It's called FISA. Must be you forgot.

Posted by Jim VanCise at February 18, 2006 06:33 PM

roberts seems to think that he is part of the executive branch----wasn't he elected to the senate, where members take an oath to defend the constitution and represent the people? regarding the administration's authority, he is quoted elsewhere as saying "we would be much more in concert with the congress, and everybody else and the fisa court judges if...."
what's with this WE? sounds to me like he thinks of himself as part of the administration or at the very least, one of their cheerleaders.
oops, sorry, i forgot he is a republican!!

Posted by martha 6 at February 18, 2006 10:14 PM

All followers of this administration, senators and congresspeople alike, act like they themselves are under NSA surveillance and they've been told so. As far as politician go, to speak against these practices means the loss of their first love, money. They've sold their integrity. These people, like the those in the public sector who follow blindly the Orwellian doctrines of this administration are "frogs in pot of water on an increasingly rising gas-powered flame." Being inside the pot may feel safe (thus, their version of national security), but those who command blind allegiance control the flames. (You will never find them inside of the "pot") Food, gas, taxes, medicine, you name it, more and more, most of us cannot afford it, including those who support this administration. And yet they will starve to death, die without healthcare, and sit inside of a boiling pot of water paralyzed with fear and die without purpose surrounded by a false sense of security. Because before they realize what's happening, the boiling water will consume them as the expendable resources in which this adminstration views them. If you don't have an 8-figure sum of money in your bank account, you are not important. And if you have little or no money at all, you are only fit for "slavery." Sinclair Lewis predicted a long time ago..."When facism comes to america, it will have a cross in one hand and the american flag in the other." Some predictions do come true.

Posted by suzaunna at February 19, 2006 09:16 AM

Politicians and their administrators have not only sold their integrity for eternal life of damnation, but they have also sold their own souls onto earthly prostitution. America's politicians, administrators and supporters are nothing more and nothing less than prostitutes.

It is a shame that these forums aren't praising the American government. But the truth is the truth. Nothing more, and nothing less.

Posted by one out of the box at February 19, 2006 10:56 AM

I agree. People who can be "bought" are nothing more than prostitutes.
As I stated yesterday, I've been reading many different things about many different topics. I don't believe EVERYTHING I read but I do like to look up both sides and make my own decisions. This "spying" goes much deeper than I believe anyone could ever imagine. For instance, why do ALL computers have built in microphones as well as speakers? (I'm not talking about the ones you plug a headset into) Speakers I can understand because of reading the beeps for diagnostics. (I KNOW firsthand that there are microphones...) And IS what I read true about newer TV's & computers having built in cameras where the "brightness" button is??? I wouldn't put ANYTHING past them. I believe the "real" reason for spying has nothing to do with contrived terrorist attacks. I think it's merely a tool for "them" to guage how ready we are to accept "their new world order". And to stop anyone from getting together to oppose them.
Look how slowly and insidiuosly they've made it seem "OK" to have cameras watching us. Traffic cams, the Dr. Phil show, While You Were Out, and it just goes on and on and on. And we all just roll over and want our 15 seconds of glory.

Posted by tam at February 19, 2006 02:17 PM

What is all of this revisionist garbage anyway?

The President broke the law,he knew he was breaking the law when he did it,and openly admits to having done so.So what's the problem?Just hold the man accountable for his actions,give him his day in court like everyone else and let him face the consequences of his actions,Just like any other citizen.

Changing the law after being caught red handed is something that Kings do, not Presidents.The last time I checked,our present form of government is not a monarchy(at least not yet).

Posted by Ed at February 19, 2006 04:28 PM

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Roberts says domestic spying could protect us from a 911. How could the system built to protect us from Soviet aircraft allow an airborne hit on our Pentagon? Bush & Cheney had commanded a full military stand-down on that day (they called it an "exercise"). That is a fact. Senator Roberts, have you been checked for an implant? Or perhaps you might be blackmailed because someone tapped your email? And it's the seriousness of the accusation that is important, rather than the truth (per Ted Kennedy)?

Posted by Remember Honesty? at February 19, 2006 11:04 PM

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated and will not be posted if they contain insults, flaming of other posters, profanity or libelous comments. Comments that are off topic will be deleted. Thanks for waiting.)


Top of Page

RECENT STORIES

Sign up for our Daily Newsletter mailing list!