News Categories



Capitol Hill Blue is a not-for-profit, non-commercial experiment in on-line journalism published as an information resource for our readers. All material is © 2006 Capitol Hill Blue. For more information, please check out our FAQ. We take your privacy seriously at Capitol Hill Blue.
CHB Home / Half-Shell Home/ Print This Page / Email this page

Judge orders Bush to release info on domestic spying

February 17, 2006 05:41 AM / Bush Leagues .

By KATHERINE SHRADER

A federal judge ordered the Bush administration on Thursday to release documents about its warrantless surveillance program or spell out what it is withholding, a setback to efforts to keep the program under wraps.

At the same time, the Republican chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee said he had worked out an agreement with the White House to consider legislation and provide more information to Congress on the eavesdropping program. The panel's top Democrat, who has requested a full-scale investigation, immediately objected to what he called an abdication of the committee's responsibilities.

U.S. District Judge Henry Kennedy ruled that a private group, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, will suffer irreparable harm if the documents it has been seeking since December are not processed promptly under the Freedom of Information Act. He gave the Justice Department 20 days to respond to the group's request.

"President Bush has invited meaningful debate about the wireless surveillance program," Kennedy said. "That can only occur if DOJ processes its FOIA requests in a timely fashion and releases the information sought."

Justice Department spokeswoman Tasia Scolinos said the department has been "extremely forthcoming" with information and "will continue to meet its obligations under FOIA."

On Capitol Hill, lawmakers also have been seeking more information about Bush's program that allowed the National Security Agency to eavesdrop _ without court warrants _ on Americans whose international calls and e-mails it believed might be linked to al-Qaida.

After a two-hour closed-door session, Senate Intelligence Chairman Pat Roberts, R-Kan., said the committee adjourned without voting on whether to open an investigation. Instead, he and the White House confirmed that they had an agreement to give lawmakers more information on the nature of the program. The White House also has committed to make changes to the current law, according to Roberts and White House deputy press secretary Dana Perino.

"I believe that such an investigation at this point ... would be detrimental to this highly classified program and efforts to reach some accommodation with the administration," Roberts said.

Still, he promised to consider the Democratic request for a vote in a March 7 meeting.

Earlier, Bush spokesman Scott McClellan reiterated that Bush does not need Congress' approval to authorize the warrantless eavesdropping and that the president would resist any legislation that might compromise the program.

Later Thursday, Bush adviser Karl Rove told at the University of Central Arkansas: "The purpose of the terrorist-surveillance program is to protect lives. The president's actions were legal and fully consistent with the 4th Amendment and the protection of our civil liberties under the constitution."

West Virginia Sen. Jay Rockefeller, the Intelligence Committee's top Democrat, said the White House had applied heavy pressure to Republicans to prevent them from conducting thorough oversight. He complained that Roberts didn't even allow a vote on a proposal for a 13-point investigation that would include the program's origin and operation, technical aspects and questions raised by federal judges.

Rockefeller said the Senate cannot consider legislation because lawmakers don't have enough information. "No member of the Senate can cast an informed vote on legislation authorizing or conversely restricting the NSA's warrantless surveillance program, when they fundamentally do not know what they are authorizing or restricting," he said.

It remains unclear what changes in law may look like. Roberts indicated it may be possible "to fix" the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to authorize the president's program. Perino said the White House considers suggestions put forward by Sen. Mike DeWine, R-Ohio, the starting point, particularly his proposal to create a special subcommittee on Capitol Hill that would regularly review the program.

DeWine's proposal would exempt Bush's program from FISA. That law set up a special court to approve warrants for monitoring inside the United States for national security investigations.

Yet Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John Warner, R-Va., left the closed hearing saying he has been working on a different legislative change to FISA. "It seems that's a logical place to start, to upgrade FISA given the extraordinary expanse of technology in the 30 years that have lapsed," he said.

Senate Judiciary Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., told a forum at Georgetown University Law School Thursday night, "You cannot have domestic search and seizure without a warrant." He is drafting legislation to require the foreign surveillance court to review Bush's program and determine if it is constitutional.

California Rep. Jane Harman, ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, told the Georgetown audience the surveillance "can and must comply" with the law requiring warrants from the special court. However, she supported the need to conduct electronic eavesdropping to combat terrorism.

Specter's committee will continue to probe the program's legality at a Feb. 28 hearing. The Justice Department strongly discouraged him from calling former Attorney General John Ashcroft and his deputy, James Comey, to testify about the surveillance program.

Just as Attorney General Alberto Gonzales could not talk about the administration's internal deliberations when he appeared before the committee earlier this month, neither can Ashcroft nor Comey, Assistant Attorney General William Moschella said in a letter to Specter.

___

Associated Press writers Jennifer Loven, Mark Sherman and Larry Margasak contributed to this report.

© 2006 The Associated Press


© Copyright 2006 by Capitol Hill Blue

Comments

I suspect the Bush administration has intercepted, read, and acted upon communications between their various political enemies. Unless a full investigation is launched, this suspicion will not be allayed. They practice a sort of "toxic politics," and I can't for the life of me see them doing otherwise with this capability.

Posted by Linda J at February 17, 2006 08:34 AM

Since the administration has already lied about Saddam Hussein being linked to al-Quaida, what makes anyone think they'd be any more honest about you and me? ...especially if we happen to disagree with their outrageous policies!

Posted by Lylene at February 17, 2006 09:24 AM

Well,first they stole the elections and now they will lie, spy, kidnap and kill to keep the Presidency! Why does this astound the American people? THEY'RE FUCKING CROOKS!!!!! THAT'S WHAT CROOKS DO!!!!!

Go to "http://cyclone696.blogspot.com" Read the latest post entitled "An Absolute Must Read"! Wake the fuck up America!!!!!

Posted by Stoney13 at February 17, 2006 04:33 PM

1984...Freedom is Slavery, Thinking is bad, destruction is rebuilding....apparently the brainwashing is working on many. Another election is coming without a voter verifiable auditable system. Why Americans don't stop work and hit the streets is beyond me. We need a national strike day to force congress and the senate that they work for us and that they are to limit and control the executive branch.....so sayith the constituion!

Posted by Ada at February 17, 2006 04:45 PM

The cover-up continues. The Bu$h criminal syndicate isn't going to give an inch on anything. They have been spying on their "enemies" for years now and if it ever surfaces they're toast so instead they use the "dirt" they've dug up on everyone to block any action or investigations of this matter. The simple truth is they have everyone scared to death of what they know about them.

Posted by glenn at February 17, 2006 04:46 PM

Hey Listen Up! The American government lives in more fear than their adversaries do. Just think about it, . . . How would you wake up feeling in the morning knowing your dasterly deeds could catch up and find you out, . . . and then try to go to sleep at night knowing all of the scag you have created on yourself has brought you to a low value! This is why crooks need monitary things, for this gives them [false] self worth.

P.S. Don't be foolish in not knowing, . . . the A.G. officials are also being closely monitored.

They all have to tip their hats off when they greet each other, because looking at one, you see them all!

Posted by at February 17, 2006 08:29 PM

FOR THE LOVE AND SAKE OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, PRUNE THE DEAD BRANCHES OFF THE DOGWOOD TREE! NOW!

Posted by at February 17, 2006 08:33 PM

On tonight’s appearance of 'Newshour', it was heard by Gloria Borger, "This was a simple hunting accident." A simple hunting accident? Miss Borger must be in a state of delusional mind! She must think the public is all just first grade students. Pardon, but we are intelligent viewers, and what our eyes are telling us is, . . . Our government officials have abused life and the unfortunate harm of others for a detrimental amount of time.

Miss Borger also claims (like so many others in the defense corner of the Bush administration), V.P. Cheney wanted to get the facts before reporting. The fact remains, . . . V.P. Cheney shot and wounded a fellow hunter to a level of seriousness emergency care was called upon. What other facts did V.P. Cheney feel he needed to be prepared with before reporting his actions? The truth is, . . . V.P. Cheney did not want the true condition to be known. Period!

Miss Borger also claimed the statement of saying, . . . "V.P. Cheney is the most powerful and influential V.P. she has ever seen." If this was true, he wouldn't have hid himself from the public, and from the truth.

Gloria Borger reported to say, . . . That there was no 'Plan B" within the Bush administration in regards to Whittington suffering a heart attack. Of course not. The truth once again caught the government by surprise! This is why it took a day or so to get 'Plan A," out to the public, . . . (V.P. Cheney's story telling of the events leading to his shooting against Whittington).

It was also stated on 'Newshour', it has been more than two hundred years since a V.P. or a President shot someone. Excuse, but we are not ALL deaf, dumb, and blind to the facts. NOT ALL SHOOTINGS AND ASSASSINATIONS GET REPORTED. Most likely, if V.P. Cheney had things his way, he would have rather left the scene of his actions in a full term, not just for a day or so.

Why do people like Miss Borger believe the mass should not be given knowledge of the events in every day living? Who are they to run and rule "LIFE" without the rest of the runners? Without the panel of society, there would be no one watching them. For they must bore themselves and each other with their inept and idle chatter. Why does the public watch such foolishness? So we can discern and screen out the wise from the fools, the truth from the fiction, and the good from the bad.

So now in summary, . . . As it is true to agree with, . . . V.P. Cheney is not a Vice as one may place his position of being behind President Bush. V.P. Cheney is a 'Co-President' in a stance 'with' President Bush. So with this being the case in fact, we question, . . . Within the results of President Bush becoming an impeached President, does V.P. Cheney then become an impeached 'Co-President?

Perhaps this is in part of the reasoning to why V.P. Cheney was found visiting in his hometown, Wyoming. Securing his base, and securing his position is vital at this time, . . . Someone (V.P. Cheney?) needs to attempt in putting the blinders on the people before EVERYONE gets to see the truth, and enforces both men to be present at the same impeachment trial!

Posted by at February 18, 2006 12:20 AM

oyauw qoqf

Posted by Jennette at March 3, 2006 03:31 AM

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated and will not be posted if they contain insults, flaming of other posters, profanity or libelous comments. Comments that are off topic will be deleted. Thanks for waiting.)


Top of Page

RECENT STORIES

Sign up for our Daily Newsletter mailing list!