News Categories



Capitol Hill Blue is a not-for-profit, non-commercial experiment in on-line journalism published as an information resource for our readers. All material is © 2006 Capitol Hill Blue. For more information, please check out our FAQ. We take your privacy seriously at Capitol Hill Blue.
CHB Home / Half-Shell Home/ Print This Page / Email this page

Judge considers deadline on producing spy records

February 10, 2006 04:38 PM / FUBAR .

By PETE YOST
A federal judge said Friday he was considering setting a deadline for the Justice Department to produce records on the Bush administration's warrantless surveillance program or to explain in court why it was refusing to do so.

U.S. District Judge Henry Kennedy said he was convinced the public would suffer irreparable harm if the government dragged its feet in a lawsuit filed over access to the documents.

The lawsuit was filed by three private groups who say the government is engaging in a pattern of delay and should be compelled to provide information on the underlying legal rationale for the surveillance and the scope of the eavesdropping program.

Congress is having difficulty getting the same information.

The Electronic Privacy Information Center, the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Security Archive asked for the material shortly after The New York Times revealed the eavesdropping on Dec. 16. The only response from the government was agreeing to put the requests on a fast track for decision-making.

Justice Department lawyer Ropa Bhattacharyya said the government would respond starting March 3, but she said she had no information on when the process might be completed.

The Freedom of Information Act says that the government shall respond "as soon as practicable."

"Seven, eight, nine, 10 years? Is that the government's position?" Kennedy asked the Justice Department attorney.

Timing will depend on complexity "and in this case there are a lot of complexities," Bhattacharyya said of the highly classified program.

David Sobel, an attorney representing the three groups, said the Bush administration was taking the position that putting FOIA requests on a fast track for consideration frees the government from a specific 20-day deadline for responding that applies to ordinary requests.

"The government is suggesting it's now open-ended," Sobel complained.

Given the highly classified nature of the program, the Bush administration is likely to withhold all information about it.

Part of the groups' effort is aimed at obtaining an index of what documents exist, enabling them to present arguments in court that some of the data be declassified and released to the public.

"It's fashionable to suggest that the courts don't have a significant role to play in these matters, but I urge the court to exercise its authority to hold the government accountable," Sobel told the judge.

Sobel was referring to the fact that the Bush administration bypassed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and is conducting the program without obtaining court warrants.

Several of Kennedy's colleagues at the federal courthouse who are current or former members of the intelligence court have expressed concern about the program.

© 2006 The Associated Press


© Copyright 2006 by Capitol Hill Blue

Comments

Oh That's Good. Does ANYONE actually think that the Bush Adminstration will actually comply with a Court Order? The Only use these Facist bastards have for a court is to put them into office, or to pack it with reactionaries(Alito) or people who haven't got brains enough to pour piss out of a boot(Harriet Meyers).

Posted by Peter Chewning at February 10, 2006 04:46 PM

I think your right Peter, this is going to be put off as a national security "the enemy might know our secrets" issue. And it's going to get buried, just like trying to get info. on the energy policy.

Posted by scrugun at February 10, 2006 05:11 PM

Alito was insurance against this eventuality. Bush and Cheney must have known that this project would come to light someday.

The domestic spying case will be fought all the way to the supreme court, and the two shiney new Bush appointed judges will rule for the Administration.

This is why the Alito nomination was worth filibustering.

Posted by hella troi at February 10, 2006 11:47 PM

No surprise the DOJ is stone walling. The Bush folks have consistently shown a lack of regard for privacy, civil liberties, and judical due prdocess. Anyone remember Padilla?

Posted by tommy thunder at February 11, 2006 04:27 PM

You and me against the world, Peter. :-/

Posted by Beast of Bourbon at February 12, 2006 02:32 AM

poker rules Probaly you should read this. poker rules Hope this helps. See you next life

Posted by poker rules at March 6, 2006 09:21 AM

texas hold em Great site! Congradulations!

Posted by texas hold em at March 7, 2006 10:43 AM

texas holdem poker Great site! Congradulations!

Posted by texas holdem poker at March 7, 2006 02:19 PM

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated and will not be posted if they contain insults, flaming of other posters, profanity or libelous comments. Comments that are off topic will be deleted. Thanks for waiting.)


Top of Page

RECENT STORIES

Sign up for our Daily Newsletter mailing list!