News Categories



Capitol Hill Blue is a not-for-profit, non-commercial experiment in on-line journalism published as an information resource for our readers. All material is © 2006 Capitol Hill Blue. For more information, please check out our FAQ. We take your privacy seriously at Capitol Hill Blue.
CHB Home / Half-Shell Home/ Print This Page / Email this page

Fanning the flames

February 10, 2006 05:58 AM / Opinion .

By ANN McFEATTERS
Block News Alliance

Wars have been started this way.

A group gets riled up over a perceived slight (often religious in nature). Violence breaks out. Alliances are called into play. Reason departs. People die.

To us in America, used to seeing our president portrayed with huge ears, our flag burned, our religious leaders apologize on TV for their transgressions, freedom itself is more important than what some people choose to do with it.

But not in some countries.

The inflamed passions, violence and false allegations stoked by some sophomoric cartoons satirizing the revered Muhammad, such as one with his headdress drawn as a bomb with a lit fuse, first published four months ago in a Danish newspaper, should worry every rational human. It is not farfetched that the religious fervor of outraged Islamic fundamentalists could ignite even more hatred that would take generations to wipe out.

There is nothing that any one government can immediately do to stop this from flaming into widening protests and disinformation. Even if President Bush could deliver a great tempering speech for the ages that would be heard (and listened to) by billions of people, it would not be enough in the short term to re-regulate hearts engorged by self-justifying rage. The United Nations itself is a cauldron of conflicting beliefs and passions. Denmark's protest that its government had nothing to do with the perceived insult to Muslims fell on millions of deaf ears.

While much of the Islamic world is consumed in righteous bitterness over the satiric Western portrayals of its prophet _ Islam teaches that illustrations of its prophet are blasphemy _ in the West justifiable anger continues over terrorism. Bush just announced that, in 2002, al Qaeda, not satisfied with the carnage of 9/11, planned to blow up a West Coast skyscraper.

Bush speaks almost daily of the expanding fronts of the war against enemies of freedom, and calls on us to join in the fight. We feel our justifiable rage grow. Western publications reprint one Dane's cartoon, widely available on the Internet, and outrage mounts against the "infidels," including the entire United States. There is no conversation here, only diatribes.

Because of the cartoons and their reproduction by journalists who feel their duty is to inform readers what is happening, Europe has become a breeding ground for religious death threats and turmoil over free speech. Millions of Muslims are growing ever angrier, insisting that because of a few cartoons they are witnessing a tidal wave of sacrilegious behavior.

It is to be hoped that historians someday will not be engulfed in pondering how ridiculous cartoons in a newspaper in Copenhagen led to chants in Damascus of "Death to Denmark" and fomented a killing spree. But it's far from certain. The West is now thought by millions to be insensitive to tenets of Islam. Some radicals have called for any journalists involved to be beheaded. Some insist the cartoons are government-ordered.

The Bush administration, sensitive to the criticism rained on it for warrantless wiretapping, civil-rights abuses and prisoners held for four years without trial in Guantanamo, responded that while the cartoons are offensive, one of democracy's underpinnings is a free press.

The administration also has widened its reaction to accuse Iran and Syria of helping to perpetuate the violence. But the legitimacy of the demand to end the senseless violence has been lost amid the furor. Blind rage spurts out of once-peaceful neighborhoods.

Like a forest fire, this inferno has to die out from lack of combustible material and wind. And that will happen unless another event further infuriates Muslim sensitivities.

But the fear has been planted that another cultural clash, possibly more significant and imminent, will ignite passions that can't be controlled. Our world isn't just getting smaller, it's getting more frightening.

Understanding is not spreading; intolerance is. Our challenge is to guard against being consumed by prejudice clothed as nationalism.

An American conservative group called the Family Research Council, which claims to "defend" faith, family and freedom, implies that "jihadists" are only pretending to be offended by the cartoons. The council appears to call for more widespread publication of the cartoons: "Let's be honest: the reason liberal editors stick it to Christians while avoiding criticisms of Islam is that they know we won't cut off their heads or burn their news rooms _ and they fear jihadists will."

Cartoon violence has awakened us to the realization that while we have always known the world is dangerous, we've been in a fog over how extensive and explosive that danger is. And there are those in America as well as the Middle East who contribute to the ill will that threatens to engulf us all.

There is a well-known saying from the Bible: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."

(Ann McFeatters is Washington Bureau chief of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and The Toledo Blade. E-mail amcfeatters(at)nationalpress.com.)


© Copyright 2006 by Capitol Hill Blue

Comments

Notwithstanding many of our polictical leaders, certain actions need not be criminal in order to be unethical.

Newspapers and other publishers may have certain rights, but that doesn't mean they are in good taste.

I don't think it is necessary for newspapers to exhibit poor taste (the offending of a large percentage of the worlds population) in order to establish a right of free press.

I'd prefer the right of a free press established by revealing some of the well known, but unreported political mideeds occurring in Washington. This reporting is not only the righty of the press, but their underperformed obligation.

Posted by Richard Karam at February 10, 2006 09:45 AM

This administration is accusing Iran and Syria of perpetuating the violence of cultural clash between Christianity and Islam and uses radical right wing evagelicals like the Family Res. Council to encourage this fight, when there is no evidence of Iran or Syrian involvement. The PNAC, and the Radical Right Wing Administration have told us they want to spread Democracy and Christianity throughout the world for the goal of world domination and control of natural resources (oil etc.). Their plan is right on track, just as it was in Pre_Iraq War. Isn't it interesting that it's o.k. by them to trash the Islamic Religion in public, but SAY ONE WORD ABOUT JESUS CHRIST and you are taken off the air, out of the papers, ruined professionally and cast away as an infidel. It's also interesting that no one group will own up to who is behind these billboards. Could it be a concerted, plan of attack against the Muslims by the Christians? Remember too that it's the Muslims who have the oil.

Posted by Dr. Bob at February 10, 2006 09:53 AM

Since it is now coming out that the cartoons were published in Egypt some time ago and there were no riots ... and since it is now coming out that Muslim clerics (a few) have been circulating false cartoons and claiming they were done by the West ... and since it appears that this is a concerted effort by a fanatical religious sect to start a culture war... a pox on all of them.

This is not about respect for religious leaders. It is an attempt to impose radical Islamism on the rest of the world and it is wrong.

By the way, I'm not Muslim, Christian, or Jew, so I have no part in this fight in terms of spiritual belief.

As to oil, the last time I checked, Alaska and the Gulf Coast of the United States were not Muslim oil centers. In fact, there are areas of oil like the North Sea which are not remotely Muslim. America gets most of our oil from Canada (not yet a Muslim country), South America - mostly Roman Cathoic, some parts of Africa (Christian/Muslim/Pagan) and our own wells. Little of our oil comes from Middle-Eastern sources.

However, I am all for economic independence and be one of the persons in line a fuel cell car (not that I drive much).

Posted by Law Student at February 10, 2006 10:54 AM

The muslim world needs to grow up and learn how to get along in the modern world. It seems every time they come across something unpleasant they get in a petulant snit and start rioting and talking about beheading people.

A positive step would be if the muslims would apologize for the atrocious behavior and offer reparations for the damages done. That would be a start to opening a dialog.

I saw the cartoons published Europe. They seemed fairly innocuous to me. If the muslims didn't like them they had many avenues open to voice their discontent. I'm sure the original papers that published these images would have given them plenty of editorial space to air their grievances. They also could have written books, magazine articles and pamphlets.

I did not see the offensive cartoons created by the muslim imams to incite violence.

Freedom of speech means little if you can never publish anything someone might not like. Would the muslims have us install some hoary imam at each newspaper to vet every article and editorial before printing?

I think the article above waives some emotional flags but sheds little light on this subject.

Posted by JohnK at February 10, 2006 09:51 PM

is it just me who feels that the bar agenst picuring muhammad is largly pointless. I understand it's to stop people from idolizing (spell check? whimper) him however it seems not to have worked. i could understand a willingness to die for him but a willingness to kill for him that borders fevorent worship? would he want that? it seems to me that he is already idolized and his followers have forgotten what made muhammad and vitualy all of the figurehead religous leaders (jesus, muhammad, bhudda, ect.) great: not how great they were, but how great they treated others.

Posted by Blue sheep at February 11, 2006 02:30 AM

Has anyone seen this?

Please note the following from this article:

http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/skousen/2006/0201.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOMELAND SECURITY WILL CONTROL SAFE DEPOSIT BOXES IN A CRISIS
A source at Bellaciao.com filed the following report, which has been confirmed from other sources:
"A family member from Irvine, CA (who's a branch manager at Bank of America) told us two weeks ago that her bank held a workshop where the last two days were dedicated to discussing their bank's new security measures... [M]embers from the Homeland Security Office instructed them on how to field calls from customers and what they are to tell them in the event of a national disaster. She said they were told how only agents from Homeland Security (during such an event) would be in charge of opening safe deposit boxes and determining what items would be given to bank customers. At this point they were told that no weapons, cash, gold, or silver will be allowed to leave the bank -- only various paperwork will be given to its owners. After discussing the matter with them at length, she and the other employees were then told not to discuss the subject with anyone.
"The family member has since given her notice to quit the bank. I found the news alarming and decided to find out more myself. On a trip to my bank here in Houston, I remarked to a young bank employee (who's new there), 'Well I guess you've been told all that stuff by the manager and the Homeland Security about what to tell your customers' - and to my amazement, the young woman came right out and said yes she'd been through all that, then whispered to me across the counter, 'but we're not supposed to talk about it - I could lose my job.'" Lesson to learn: don't depend on getting access to a safety deposit box. If you must use one, only keep documents in it -- no valuables. Obviously the feds plan on confiscating gold againÅ 

Posted by Judith Krain at February 11, 2006 04:22 AM

It is important to know that the people actually responsible for spreading those cartoons are several imams from Denmark who went out of their way by traveling to the Middle East in order to intentionally start this firestorm... "Thank you Denmark for greeting us into your free country now we will help destroy your economy and more..."

Posted by Marc at February 11, 2006 12:06 PM

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated and will not be posted if they contain insults, flaming of other posters, profanity or libelous comments. Comments that are off topic will be deleted. Thanks for waiting.)


Top of Page

RECENT STORIES

Sign up for our Daily Newsletter mailing list!