News Categories



Capitol Hill Blue is a not-for-profit, non-commercial experiment in on-line journalism published as an information resource for our readers. All material is © 2006 Capitol Hill Blue. For more information, please check out our FAQ. We take your privacy seriously at Capitol Hill Blue.
CHB Home / Half-Shell Home/ Print This Page / Email this page

Deadeye Dick

February 15, 2006 04:31 AM / FUBAR .

By REG HENRY

Sometimes a story comes along that presents a unique chance to educate the American people. I refer, of course, to Vice President Dick Cheney shooting an attorney.

Several knee-jerk reactions to this news must be countered immediately. First of all, Cheney should not be hailed as a popular hero for bagging a lawyer. People, even attorneys, are always out of season, even in Texas. Besides, they often shoot back with writs, and nothing spoils a hunt more than the quarry turning on the hunter with a hail of lawsuits, known to be more deadly than birdshot.

The other thing is that attorneys do not make good eating. The one that Cheney shot was a tough old bird and is already sitting up and taking nourishment. Even cannibals won't touch attorneys because they are so hardboiled.

Knees will also jerk in the opposite direction. In effete circles where guns are not appreciated, this incident will make an easy target for criticism. Let me just remind these anti-gun critics that guns don't wound people, vice presidents wound people.

Nor should this be an occasion for piling on. He is an avid hunter who blasts away at birds at every opportunity, protecting the nation from avian flu, something for which he gets no credit.

Given the number of shots he takes, he is bound to hit an attorney from time to time because they are very thick on the ground here in America, and it's simply a matter of mathematical probability. Anybody could have made the same mistake.

One of my regular readers e-mailed me to make an important point: When John Kerry went hunting during the presidential campaign, conservatives maligned him as a poseur _ and he didn't even shoot anybody! It does seem unfair, but that was part of Sen. Kerry's problem. Rightly or wrongly, the American public thought he was the sort of guy you couldn't trust to wing anybody at a law-firm picnic.

The real lesson to be drawn here is about firearm safety. The war on terror is going to last a very long time _ it has to, because more Republicans have to be elected. This means that we are all going to have to familiarize ourselves with firearms to protect the homeland.

As it happens, I can help. I was trained on many weapons for my military service in Vietnam _ the rifle, the machine gun, the hand grenade, the typewriter and the can opener.

Cheney did not go to Vietnam. If the Viet Cong had worn duck suits instead of black pajamas, he would have been the first to enlist. But he decided to leave the job to people like myself, which may explain why his firearm handling leaves something to be desired.

The cardinal rule of firearms is that you don't shoot until you have properly identified the target. Don't shoot until you see the whites of their eyes! Of course, if the person you are shooting has had a night on the town and has bloodshot eyes, you are in for trouble. That is why in Vietnam we were told: "Don't shoot until you see the red of their politics!" In this incident, Cheney _ perhaps due to faulty intelligence _ did not stop and distinguish between quail and attorney before he started shooting. Quail are said to congregate in a covey whereas attorneys flock together in what is called a bar. Any decent field guide has identifying pictures to assist the hunter.

Thank goodness no serious harm was done! It's not like Cheney shot up a whole country looking for weapons of mass destruction.

My faithful reader suggests we start a fund to buy body armor for Cheney's hunting buddies, considering the danger they are in. Yes, I know what Donald Rumsfeld would say: You go hunting with the hunting equipment you've got. But I think the vice president's pals need extra help, too, and I would suggest that we also print up bumper stickers for our cars: "Support Our Well-Connected Attorneys Before They Become Dead Ducks."

(Reg Henry is a columnist for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. E-mail rhenry(at)post-gazette.com)


© Copyright 2006 by Capitol Hill Blue

Comments

Hee, hee, hee

Posted by Gerald Sutliff at February 15, 2006 12:23 PM

Oh I don't know about lawyers being totaly inedible! Sure they're too gamey to stew and too tough to fry, but you could soak them overnight in vinegar, and barbecue them over a slow fire of hickory using LOTS of southern style sauce! (If it'll pickle a possum, it'll lubricate a lawyer!) I'ld get a paralegal to turn the spit. Some of them will do it for free if you bag the right lawyer!

Which brings us to the next point! Cheney didn't really bag the lawyer since the lawyer is not dead! he only winged him! Like so much this administration has done, he got off to a good start, then got side-tracked somewhere amongst the details!

Posted by stoney13 at February 15, 2006 01:51 PM

Can't anybody spell Chappaquidicdickdickdick?

Posted by Rebecca Cummings at February 15, 2006 03:00 PM

To add a pithy note amongst the others, . . . "If it quacks like a duck, it must be a duck!" Vice President Cheney forgot to scream out to his fellow hunter, . . . "Duck, or I'll shoot ya!" (LOL)

Posted by at February 15, 2006 04:28 PM

If Mr. Cheney was not such a an Absolutly Evil Human Being,..(I believe 9/11 was a staged event), he might garner some sympathy from me.

Posted by at February 15, 2006 08:03 PM

Maybe cheney should hunt with one of them thar, hi tech unmaned drones, they work great on women and children.

Posted by homeboy at February 15, 2006 08:11 PM

Great Article!

Posted by yellowbelly at February 15, 2006 08:20 PM

Who still believes 911 was an unwelcoming surprise for the American government and their allies? C'mon now, . . . If you can't see THE TRUTH by now, . . . you never will.

Posted by at February 15, 2006 08:49 PM

As V. President Cheney expresses his thoughts for the media, he states he will never get the image of shooting someone out of his mind. We say, . . . Welcome into the crowd of many who live with the constant nightmares of shooting and killing someone. Not because they were in the zone of friendly fire, but because they were sent into an unjust war.

Posted by at February 15, 2006 10:39 PM

It wasn't like it was a staged planned event where you plan to win and declare victory, it was an unplanned sho(o)t-from-the right(hip) which will go on to an unplanned loss. In Memoriam

Posted by willie at February 15, 2006 11:18 PM

And so, V.P. Cheney defends himself by saying, . . . He "wanted to be sure the first reports were correct," before announcing the shooting to the press. We could guarantee, . . . if there was an explosion that took place in Corpus Christi, Texas, that may have led to injury and/or fatality, there would have been an immediate national "NEWSFLASH" posted.

So why couldn't there be a brief "NEWSFLASH" that read something like this, . . . V.P. Cheney shot and wounded, Mr. Harry Whittington while hunting in Corpus Christi, Texas. Mr. Whittington's health condition is yet unknown. Further details will be given when information becomes available.

Why all the mystery? Why was there such a long delay in reporting what happened?

V.P. Cheney stated, . . . He will feel relieved when Mr. Whittington returns home.

For information, . . . Someone returning home from the hospital does not provide validation of someone returning to one's restored health.

Posted by at February 16, 2006 02:02 AM

This is the gift that will keep on giving as long as Cheney is on the scene. Overwhelms Bush and his babbling nonsense, and makes Dick the butt of future jokes for the next 3 years! Makes the time tolerable to see someone so nefarious suffer! This is great, Karl Rove in reverse without the stench of dirty trick machinations!

Posted by Gary at February 16, 2006 02:35 AM

We wonder if there will be an investigation and/or any criminal charges filed against V.P. Cheney. Will there be any finacial compensation given to the Whittington family? If so, who's out of pocket expense will it be deleted from? Cheney or the taxpayers?

Oh what a web we weave when we shoot with our eyes closed and wing our way out of trouble, . . .

Posted by at February 16, 2006 03:41 AM

Here we go, . . . We'll announce what others dare not to, . . .

BASED ON THE FACT FINDINGS, YOU AND YOUR ADMINISTRATION HAVE COMMITTED TREASON AGAINST HUMANITY. THEREBY, PRESIDENT BUSH, YOU AND YOUR ADMINISTRATION ARE HEREBY RELEASED OF OFFICIAL DUTIES AS OF IMMEDIATELY, FEBRUARY 16, 2006.

SIGNED, THE REAL AMERICAN SOCIETY

Posted by at February 16, 2006 01:09 PM

WHY DID IT TAKE SO LONG FOR CHENEY TO REPORT HIS SHOOTING OF WHITTINGTON? PERHAPS CHENEY NEEDED TO GET "A STORY" TOGETHER.

But yet, Cheney still contradicts himself. He first tells Britt Hume on Faux 5 that he knew Whittington for about 30 years and he is a "good friend." Then when Britt Hume's gives question to Cheney, is Whittington a close friend, or friendly acquaintance, Cheney answers, "No, an acquaintance." DA! Which way is the wind flying this bird turd today?

In answer to Britt Hume's question, . . . "Mr. Vice President, how is Mr. Whittington?" "Well, the good news is he's doing very well today. I talked to him yesterday after they discovered the heart problem, but it appears now to have been pretty well resolved and the reporting today is very good."

Cheney stated this comment on 2/15/06, when doctors already released information to the public stating there is a pellet yet remaining in Whittington's heart that they are not removing. We question, . . . Does this sound as though the heart problem has been "pretty well resolved," as V.P. Cheney describes it?

Britt Hume questioned Cheney, . . . "What was he wearing?" "He was dressed in orange, he was dressed properly, but he was also . . . There was a little bit of a gully there, so he was down a little ways before land level, although I could see the upper part of his body when . . . I didn't see it at the time I shot, until after I'd fired. And the sun was directly behind him — that affected the vision, too, I'm sure."

We question, . . . When someone gets shot, don't they usually in an immediate formation, fall or tip? If so, how could Cheney clearly see Whittington "after shooting him, but not before shooting him?" If the sun affected Cheney's shooting, then why did Cheney shoot? An experienced hunter of any nature would first look to get a clear shot of the target before pulling the trigger. NONE of Cheney's explanation derives to make any sense. And why is Cheney giving his description of the shooting to Britt Hume and not to the detectives who should be investigating all witnesses and the true events of the shooting?

"But he was also" what V.P. Cheney? Oh don't bother answering. The truth won't be given away.

In regards to the remaining interview with Britt Hume and V.P. Dick Cheney, we'll leave the reading to the Bush administration. They enjoy fairytales.

Posted by at February 16, 2006 08:54 PM

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated and will not be posted if they contain insults, flaming of other posters, profanity or libelous comments. Comments that are off topic will be deleted. Thanks for waiting.)


Top of Page

RECENT STORIES

Sign up for our Daily Newsletter mailing list!