News Categories



Capitol Hill Blue is a not-for-profit, non-commercial experiment in on-line journalism published as an information resource for our readers. All material is © 2006 Capitol Hill Blue. For more information, please check out our FAQ. We take your privacy seriously at Capitol Hill Blue.
CHB Home / Half-Shell Home/ Print This Page / Email this page

Can anyone save New Orleans?

February 10, 2006 06:04 AM / FUBAR .

By DEROY MURDOCK

What's cooking in New Orleans? "Nothing," celebrity chef Emeril Lagasse recently told the New York Post's Cindy Adams. "The mayor's a clunk. The governor is also a clunk. They don't know their (derrieres) from a hole in the ground. All my three restaurants got hit. I've reopened Emeril's, but only a few locals come. There're no tourists. No visitors. No spenders. No money. No future. No people. It's lost. It'll never come back."

Congressman Richard Baker believes New Orleans and its environs can come back if it can rebuild its housing stock and thus begin rehabilitating battered communities. The Baton Rouge Republican's proposed Louisiana Recovery Corporation (LRC) appears to be the only coherent plan for revitalizing the tempest-tossed Bayou State. It deserves the proper hearing it will get before the Senate Banking Committee on Feb. 15.

Baker's bill, H.R. 4100, would issue Treasury bonds to create a $30 billion revolving loan fund. Owners of Louisiana's 240,000 damaged or destroyed homes and small businesses voluntarily could sell their property to the LRC. It would pay owners 60 percent of their equity and lenders up to 60 percent of their mortgage receivables. The LRC would consolidate these distressed or demolished properties and auction them off to private developers. Sales revenues would repay bondholders. Original owners could ask for first dibs on revitalized properties. The LRC would expire after 10 years.

Also, Baker's $30 billion revolving loan fund would collect and repay 60 cents on the dollar. Even if it underwrote 40 cents on the dollar, that would involve a $12 billion outlay, not all $30 billion.

"In this case, there is basically no market. As such, people have little or no options," Baker told BayouBuzz.com. Baker, who launched a still-operating real-estate agency at age 22 and enjoys a 91 percent lifetime American Conservative Union rating, added: "The situation calls for an unprecedented solution, through a corporation that basically remakes the market, reintroduces market forces, gets property back into commerce in a necessarily more comprehensive approach, and then gradually recedes from the marketplace over time."

As public programs go, Baker's proposal is a bit like a live-virus vaccine. A limited amount of government now, followed by better health, rather than illness and, eventually, even more government. Baker's plan should inoculate against the alternative: an epidemic of mortgage foreclosures, personal bankruptcies, bank failures, and an inevitable bailout by federal regulators at greater expense in outlays and litigation.

"I don't believe in taxing the good people of Kansas, New Hampshire, and California $30 billion on the grounds that otherwise you'll tax them more later," responds David Boaz of the libertarian Cato Institute.

While I usually agree that free markets should solve these things, New Orleans' markets largely have washed away. Last November, I witnessed moderate to jaw-dropping flood damage from Lake Pontchartrain clear down to Marais Street, just above the French Quarter. Only the roughly 10-block-wide "Sliver by the River" abutting the Mississippi, stood essentially intact.

"The bottom line is this, it is difficult to understand how Louisiana rebuilds if its landscape is littered with the remains of over 200,000 unusable homes and business properties," former Louisiana governors Mike Foster, Buddy Roemer, and David Treen, all Republicans, wrote President Bush Feb. 1. Without the Baker plan, they fear these deeds will stay "tied up in a legal mess impenetrable to the private market, for years and years to come."

Despite initial interest, the White House has cooled on the Baker plan, preferring to spend another $18 billion on emergency relief, temporary housing, and other items. Bush's efforts appear focused on, at most, 20,000 damaged homes, leaving at least 90 percent of the problem unanswered. Since federally built levees collapsed in a Category 3 hurricane, Washington should do better.

Without a mechanism for reconstituting what is, essentially, a property market in smithereens, the city that nurtured jazz, oysters Rockefeller, Mardi Gras, round-the-clock cocktails, and plenty more may be no more.

"I would ask all our fellow Americans if they can accept having within its shores a great American city and a substantial area of a culturally and economically important state lying in ruins for years to come," Baker said. "Think about that: American ruins."

(Deroy Murdock is a columnist with Scripps Howard News Service and a senior fellow with the Atlas Economic Research Foundation in Fairfax, Va. E-mail him at deroy.murdock(at)gmail.com.)


© Copyright 2006 by Capitol Hill Blue

Comments

There's too much pessimism about New Orleans' recovery. People are expecting instant gratification and immediate results. The damage is horrendous; recovery is going to take years, not mere months. Many businesses will fail, but new ones will take their place. Tourism is going to recover slowly; the adverse publicity because of all of the problems has put most people off. Life always goes on; it just may not have the same people doing the same things in the same places. There's a long, long road ahead, but there'll be an eventual end.

Posted by GC at February 10, 2006 08:31 AM

An even bleaker picture is painted by the Survival Of New Orleans Blog that was begun the night before Katrina hit by a group who stayed in their downtown office highrise and kept a link up throughout the coming months including webcam shots of the city. They continue to report and it isn't pretty or hopefull in the least.

http://mgno.com/

Posted by C. J. Thompson at February 10, 2006 10:14 AM

I want someone to explain why the media has so little mentioned the fact that the Dept. of Interior offered FEMA unlimited amounts of aid - boats, trucks, food, water, personnel, etc. and was not accepted. If I were a resident of the destroyed areas of that beautiful city, I would raise hell.

Posted by at February 10, 2006 03:39 PM

This is the America of the future. Infrastructure collapse because all the money is being put in the pockets of poltical cronies. A gradual decline that no one will fix.

This is the beginning of the slow slide into decadence.

Posted by Nyx at February 10, 2006 04:31 PM

The people that lived there will rebuild when the idiot trouble causing government gets we should go get fema out of there they are all bad.Homeland security causes trouble too. If those people ever wake up i pitts those boys at fema,the old people are smart an will win.

Posted by Daryl at February 10, 2006 09:52 PM

It is, of course, a wretched tragedy.

I sincerely regret, that it happened, not only to the venerable city, itself, but to its occupants, who, by no means, deserved such misery, and I also regret that I never got to see and experience New Orleans. I always wanted to, but was forever putting it off. Now, I shall never know the great city and community that was.

That said, one must ponder the question: There is a point at which anything, (house, car, even the human body,) reaches a point of "no return," a point at which it is beyond salvage, repair.

One must ask, without hyperbole and emotional antics, if perhaps this is, very sadly, the case with New Orleans.

Posted by Robert Mee at February 11, 2006 12:45 AM

Addendum: a typographical error on my name.

Sorry, folks.

I've always believed that if you believe you have something worth saying, (whether you do, or not, might be another point to debate), that you should have the courage to "say" it without being "anonymous," and put your name behind it.

Thus, I elect to make this brief correction.

Posted by Robert Meek at February 11, 2006 12:48 AM

last time i checked you stupids are still not moving your arses every fracking one of you americans is late. you ARE SUPPOSED TO BE IN Washington D.C. Moving to restore the power. King needed 100,000 plus folk to end viet nam. Guess what you will need 1000 times that i promise. Else you will not prevail.
so if you are a American and would like to continue to live the dream you now have to WORK FOR IT.
What work? Well the mall is the one legal place to protest so DO IT. 12 million strong nothing can stop you and your voice. if half went for country and half stayed to keep life going you would have some 160 million heads this prob would be plenty to grab every limp ass NEO-CON and wall them into some form of getto crap they like to promote so much. And make them work like fracking heck to get out. Do this and you have a chance to avoid the fire. Fail and it is eveyones ASS. Rember M.A.D. is still to be feared. so start marching to D.C. Camp the mall or any place that you can in D.C. as close to the mall as you can get and see your government fall LIVE and in PERSON. You will not be dissapointed i assure you. p.s. it will be of some inconveince but stay calm look to your fellow man for help and stay untill to you it is DONE. Then the world you return to may not be so bad after all.
this is one HUGE fork in the road folks dont frack it up now.

Posted by Masher1 at February 11, 2006 03:28 AM

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated and will not be posted if they contain insults, flaming of other posters, profanity or libelous comments. Comments that are off topic will be deleted. Thanks for waiting.)


Top of Page

RECENT STORIES

Sign up for our Daily Newsletter mailing list!