From Capitol Hill Blue

Bush Leagues
Liberal Study Finds More Cuts in Bush Budget
By MARY DALRYMPLE
Feb 10, 2005, 04:21

Spending restraints in President Bush's budget proposal would mean deep cuts to environmental protection, community development, veterans benefits and other programs through the end of the decade, a liberal think tank said Wednesday.

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities said its calculations, made using budget information provided to congressional committees, reveal future spending cuts that the White House wants but didn't detail in the 2006 budget it sent to lawmakers Monday.

"They did real budgeting, they just decided to hide it," said Richard Kogan, a budget analyst at the center. "I don't fault them for budgeting, I fault them for hiding it."

By proposing annual lids on government spending without giving program-by-program details of potential program cuts in 2007 through 2010, the report said, the White House sidestepped a debate on policy trade-offs.

"It is difficult to assess the impact of the proposed caps when one does not know what types of cuts the administration is planning to achieve them," the report concluded.

White House budget office spokesman Chad Kolton would not comment specifically on the center's calculations but said future budget decisions will be made year-by-year.

"There is still ample room for increases in priority programs," he said. "We're happy to talk about what we can do going forward, even in very restrained budgets."

The cuts in the center's report aim at a narrow slice of government programs with budgets set annually by lawmakers, not including defense and homeland security. Their calculations assume that the amount of money devoted to the programs should keep up with inflation.

The center calculated that education and employment programs would take the biggest hit, measured in dollars lost, during the second half of the decade. Those programs would lose $43.2 billion, while natural resources and environment programs would lose $27.2 billion and health programs would lose $25.9 billion.

By 2010, programs except the Commerce Department would see cuts between 4 percent and 34 percent. Energy programs would be cut 34 percent, environment programs by 23 percent and community development by 21 percent. The center's analysts said the Commerce Department's budget reflected money needed for the upcoming census.

Other than the census, only a few areas would escape the reductions. They include international development and humanitarian assistance, federal law enforcement, water transportation programs and Medicare administration.

---

On the Net:

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities: http://www.cbpp.org

White House budget office: http://www.omb.gov

© 2005 The Associated Press

© Copyright 2005 Capitol Hill Blue

Fair Use Notice
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.