| Bush's situational ethics
By ANN McFEATTERS
Mar 17, 2006, 06:50
| Email this article
Printer friendly page
It does not square with what schoolchildren learn about the principles for which this country has stood.
Here are a few examples:
Even as the Bush administration seeks another $91 billion to fight in Iraq while piling up a $9 trillion national debt, 60 percent of Americans tell pollsters that Iraq was not worth going to war over and 55 percent say civil war and more chaos in Iraq are the likely outcome. Only 40 percent agree with Bush that Iraq soon will have a stable government, the first domino leading to Middle East democracy.
Bush is not wrong in seeking to spread democracy. But his assumption it could be done on the cheap and his sending mixed messages about America's strategies have inestimably undermined this nation's goals.
Bush went to war in Iraq ignoring warnings that "victory" would be more difficult than he expected. He ignored the military's warning that more troops were needed, underestimated the strength of the insurgency and has refused to admit any mistakes.
His remarkably strange new national security report makes clear that if he had it all to do over again, he would do the same things, in the same order, on the same scale.
Even though weapons of mass destruction have not been found in Iraq, which is disintegrating, Bush insists he was right. His new report accordingly demands the world go along with all U.S. goals, whether they involve war or peace.
A few years ago, Bush was full of praise for Russia, raising his glass in tribute to Vladimir Putin and Russia's path to democracy and capitalism despite signals Russia was straying from that path.
Now Bush is not so certain: "Strengthening our relationship (with Russia) will depend on the policies, foreign and domestic, that Russia adopts. Recent trends regrettably point toward a diminishing commitment to democratic freedoms and institutions. We will work to try to persuade the Russian Government to move forward, not backward, along freedom's path."
Bush warns China that its leaders cannot stay on a path toward peace "while holding on to old ways of thinking and acting that exacerbate concerns throughout the region and the world." He defines "old ways" as expanding China's military, expanding trade and supporting resource-rich countries without regard to misrule at home or misbehavior abroad.
That, of course, is exactly how the United States became the world's superpower -- amassing the world's most impressive military force, expanding trade and extracting resources at home and abroad no matter what the local politics were.
To read Bush's 19,000 words is to experience an us-against-them fear -- his fear that in the last six years the world has become a far more dangerous place, that he trusts few, that old allies are no longer reliable in following our lead.
Bush's message to our children in this surreal document is that situational ethics is right. Increasingly, that is how the rest of the world perceives us -- as believing that the end justifies the means.
(Columnist Ann McFeatters has covered the White House and national politics since 1986. E-mail firstname.lastname@example.org)
Copyright © 2006 Capitol Hill Blue. All rights reserved
| Bush Leagues
|Bush's bible-thumping bothered German leader|
|As doubt grows, Bush sticks stubbornly to Iraq strategy|
|Bush finally admits Iraq is becoming his Vietnam|
|Bush faces tough sell to a skeptical Capitol Hill|
|Bush pressures Republicans to support his terror bill|
|Cheney overlooks the facts when he brags about U.S. safety|
|Bush tries to use 9/11 memories for political advantage|
|What Bush said|
|Cheney sticks to hardline rhetoric|
|Bush vows 'never forget'|