Capitol Hill Blue is a not-for-profit, non-commercial experiment in on-line journalism published as an information resource for our readers. All material is © 2006 Capitol Hill Blue. For more information, please check out our FAQ. We take your privacy seriously at Capitol Hill Blue.
Home / The Rant / ReaderRant

FUBAR


EPA Flushes Sewage Dumping Plan
By JOAN LOWY
May 20, 2005, 06:31
Email this article
 
Printer friendly page

The Environmental Protection Agency announced Thursday that it will dump its much-criticized proposal to allow municipal sewage agencies to release partially treated sewage during wet weather.

The agency, which proposed the policy change in November 2003, received 98,000 public comments on the plan, many of them critical. The EPA issued a press release announcing the proposal had been dropped hours before the House was scheduled to vote on an amendment that would block the agency from implementing the plan.

Municipal sewage agencies sought the change, saying their treatment capacity is often overwhelmed by storm water during heavy rains. They are already permitted under the Clean Water Act to blend sewage that has not been treated for bacteria or pathogens with fully treated sewage during extreme weather events such as hurricanes.

However, building, repairing and upgrading sewage pipes and treatment plants to avoid the necessity for blending during more routine storms would cost sewage agencies and their customers tens of billions of dollars, according to industry and EPA estimates.

The policy change would also have benefited builders and developers, allowing local governments in fast-growing areas to lift moratoriums on new sewer hookups or lower their fees.

"Blending is not a long-term solution," said Benjamin Grumbles, EPA's assistant administrator for water. "Our goal is to reduce overflows and increase treatment of wastewater to protect human health and the environment."

The congressional amendment had more than 100 Democratic and Republican co-sponsors.

"The EPA has been mulling over this policy change for nearly two years," said Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., chief sponsor of the amendment. "It's about time they recognized this policy proposal is bad for public health, bad for the environment and bad for business."

Among those opposing the policy were state agencies in Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Washington, shellfish growers and environmental groups.

"This decision shows that citizens' concern for clean water can trump Washington politics," said Christy Leavitt, a water specialist with the environmental group U.S. PIRG.

On the Net: www.epa.gov  

(E-mail Joan Lowy at LowyJ(at)shns.com.)


Copyright © 2006 Capitol Hill Blue. All rights reserved


We welcome reader comments:
Discuss this story and other issues in ReaderRant.



Top of Page

FUBAR
Latest Headlines

American Envoy: U.S. showed 'stupidity' in Iraq war
Pentagon report claims propaganda program legal
FCC ordered destruction of media ownership study
Coleman screws the pooch on target missle
Pentagon wants interest limits on payday loans
Plame, Wilson sue Armitage over identity leak
Another Homeland Security screwup
Is this Arnie's Watergate?
Rice admits U.S. not safe from terrorist attacks
Death recommended for U.S. soldiers in Iraqi murders