Capitol Hill Blue is a not-for-profit, non-commercial experiment in on-line journalism published as an information resource for our readers. All material is © 2006 Capitol Hill Blue. For more information, please check out our FAQ. We take your privacy seriously at Capitol Hill Blue.
Home / The Rant / ReaderRant

What Price Freedom?


Prudes lose a round
By Staff and Wire Reports
Feb 25, 2005, 20:27
Email this article
 
Printer friendly page

In a rare win for freedom of expression, the Federal Communications Friday ruled a love scene from the canceled TV show "Angel" that showed a female character turning into a vampire and biting her partner's neck did not overstep federal indecency rules.

It was one of two scenes from a November 2003 episode of "Angel" that were not "sufficiently graphic or explicit to render the program patently offensive" by contemporary standards, the FCC said in denying an indecency complaint from the Parents Television Council.

"Angel," which was canceled by the WB last year after five seasons, starred David Boreanaz in the title role of an 18th-century vampire who tried to atone for past evil deeds in present day Los Angeles.

One scene involved Angel in an intimate moment with a female character in which Angel's hips are seen "moving back and forth," the Parents Television Council said in its complaint.

In the scene depicting the female vampire biting the neck of her partner, also a vampire, both characters had clothes on and "their breathing is heavy," the complaint said.

The episode aired at 9 p.m. EST on Nov. 19, 2003. The indecency law bars nonsatellite radio and noncable television stations from airing between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. indecent material such as references to sexual and excretory functions. Those are the hours when children are more likely to be watching TV.

But not all sexual and excretory references or scenes are considered indecent. The FCC must consider context and its decisions are subjective interpretations of the law.

The FCC said the "Angel" scenes were not patently offensive "as defined by commission precedent" and therefore were not indecent.

The complaint was officially filed against WBDC-TV in Washington, though the program aired on WB stations across the country. The FCC asks that indecency complaints include the call letters of a television or radio station.

---

On the Net:

Federal Communications Commission: http://www.fcc.gov


Copyright © 2006 Capitol Hill Blue. All rights reserved


We welcome reader comments:
Discuss this story and other issues in ReaderRant.



Top of Page

What Price Freedom?
Latest Headlines

Americans mark 9/11 anniversary
Americans remember 9/11
Court rules school can't block anti-Bush t-shirt
No more 'are you now or have you ever been?'
Let's play 'Spot the Terrorist'
U.S. steps up passenger checks
New York releases 911 tapes from 9/11
Is all this really for our own good?
Invasion of the fear-mongers
Something is lost when government calls you a terrorist